David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

From www.davidgleason.com:

I was born after the Second World War in Cleveland,
Ohio as David Frackelton Gleason. My second given name,
Eduardo, was bestowed upon my baptism.

Now, only by searching church records could one contest or
verify this assertion; considering that there seems to be
no accessible evidence to the contrary, why do folks
continue to question the validity of this name?

Perhaps David could comment: was this moniker bestowed
as 'Eduardo' or 'Edward' or 'Edouard' or some other
version of the name?

If indeed as he says it has always been Eduardo, then
there appears to be little justification for use of
pejoratives like 'faux hispanic'. I don't remember
seeing any claims for hispanic ancestry in Mr. Gleason's
web pages or in any posts in the N.G. either.

....Just would like to see an end to the incessant ad
hominem crap in this N.G.

Michael

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

msg wrote:

From www.davidgleason.com:

I was born after the Second World War in Cleveland,

Ohio as David Frackelton Gleason. My second given name,
Eduardo, was bestowed upon my baptism.

Now, only by searching church records could one contest or
verify this assertion; considering that there seems to be
no accessible evidence to the contrary, why do folks
continue to question the validity of this name?

Perhaps David could comment: was this moniker bestowed
as 'Eduardo' or 'Edward' or 'Edouard' or some other
version of the name?

I should have check the archives of this N.G.; from a post
by 'David Eduardo' in Feb. 2007:

My mother selected the name, and the godparents "gave it" at the
ceremony... as in "they gave the response" That's the way it is done. The
priest asks the godparents, "and what name have you selected..." and the
godparents respond. The person who decided on the name can be the parents,
or the whole family, I suppose. In my case, it was my mother... who used a
name she liked from when she lived in Europe whjich was, as required, also
the name of a saint.

So why does this name-calling persist? Are the participants invested in
some Lemon-Mathau "Grumpy Old Men" style of rivalry? There are never any
emoticons or cues to the intensity of remarks so one can only conclude
that they are either done in animosity or in poorly-constructed mock
indignation, left up to the reader to deduce.

Michael

Michael

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

On Feb 23, 6:56�pm, msg wrote:
�Fromwww.davidgleason.com:

I was born after the Second World War in Cleveland,

� Ohio as David Frackelton Gleason. My second given name,
� Eduardo, was bestowed upon my baptism.

Now, only by searching church records could one contest or
verify this assertion; considering that there seems to be
no accessible evidence to the contrary, why do folks
continue to question the validity of this name?

Perhaps David could comment: was this moniker bestowed
as 'Eduardo' or 'Edward' or 'Edouard' or some other
version of the name?

If indeed as he says it has always been Eduardo, then
there appears to be little justification for use of
pejoratives like 'faux hispanic'. �I don't remember
seeing any claims for hispanic ancestry in Mr. Gleason's
web pages or in any posts in the N.G. either.

...Just would like to see an end to the incessant ad
hominem crap in this N.G.

Michael

He used "Eduardo" to get a job with the now private, in-retreat
Univision, since he is only a high-scool dropout with a lousy podunk
GED. It is also going to make it harder for Univision to fire/layoff
him. Because of this, he feels very insecure, hense the need to
continually joist with us educated folk. Hell, my company wouldn't
even consider him, as they require at least a high school diploma and
US citizenship.

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

On Feb 23, 7:19�pm, msg wrote:
msg wrote:
�Fromwww.davidgleason.com:

I was born after the Second World War in Cleveland,

� Ohio as David Frackelton Gleason. My second given name,
� Eduardo, was bestowed upon my baptism.

Now, only by searching church records could one contest or
verify this assertion; considering that there seems to be
no accessible evidence to the contrary, why do folks
continue to question the validity of this name?

Perhaps David could comment: was this moniker bestowed
as 'Eduardo' or 'Edward' or 'Edouard' or some other
version of the name?

I should have check the archives of this N.G.; from a post
by 'David Eduardo' in Feb. 2007:

My mother selected the name, and the godparents "gave it" at the
ceremony... as in "they gave the response" That's the way it is done. The
priest asks the godparents, "and what name have you selected..." and the
godparents respond. The person who decided on the name can be the parents,
or the whole family, I suppose. In my case, it was my mother... who used a
name she liked from when she lived in Europe whjich was, as required, also
the name of a saint.

So why does this name-calling persist? Are the participants invested in
some Lemon-Mathau "Grumpy Old Men" style of rivalry? �There are never any
emoticons or cues to the intensity of remarks so one can only conclude
that they are either done in animosity or in poorly-constructed mock
indignation, left up to the reader to deduce.

Michael

Michael- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Could you decipher that for us educated folks?

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

On Feb 23, 4:19 pm, msg wrote:
msg wrote:
Fromwww.davidgleason.com:

I was born after the Second World War in Cleveland,

Ohio as David Frackelton Gleason. My second given name,
Eduardo, was bestowed upon my baptism.

Now, only by searching church records could one contest or
verify this assertion; considering that there seems to be
no accessible evidence to the contrary, why do folks
continue to question the validity of this name?

Perhaps David could comment: was this moniker bestowed
as 'Eduardo' or 'Edward' or 'Edouard' or some other
version of the name?

I should have check the archives of this N.G.; from a post
by 'David Eduardo' in Feb. 2007:

My mother selected the name, and the godparents "gave it" at the
ceremony... as in "they gave the response" That's the way it is done. The
priest asks the godparents, "and what name have you selected..." and the
godparents respond. The person who decided on the name can be the parents,
or the whole family, I suppose. In my case, it was my mother... who used a
name she liked from when she lived in Europe whjich was, as required, also
the name of a saint.

So why does this name-calling persist? Are the participants invested in
some Lemon-Mathau "Grumpy Old Men" style of rivalry? There are never any
emoticons or cues to the intensity of remarks so one can only conclude
that they are either done in animosity or in poorly-constructed mock
indignation, left up to the reader to deduce.

Michael

Michael

I agree with you. I see no need to abuse Eduardo on a personal level.
Now calling him an IBOC shill is fine because that is what he is.
What's next, rude comments about his mother?

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

On Feb 23, 8:12�pm, wrote:
On Feb 23, 4:19 pm, msg wrote:





msg wrote:
�Fromwww.davidgleason.com:

I was born after the Second World War in Cleveland,

� Ohio as David Frackelton Gleason. My second given name,
� Eduardo, was bestowed upon my baptism.

Now, only by searching church records could one contest or
verify this assertion; considering that there seems to be
no accessible evidence to the contrary, why do folks
continue to question the validity of this name?

Perhaps David could comment: was this moniker bestowed
as 'Eduardo' or 'Edward' or 'Edouard' or some other
version of the name?

I should have check the archives of this N.G.; from a post
by 'David Eduardo' in Feb. 2007:

My mother selected the name, and the godparents "gave it" at the
ceremony... as in "they gave the response" That's the way it is done. The
priest asks the godparents, "and what name have you selected..." and the
godparents respond. The person who decided on the name can be the parents,
or the whole family, I suppose. In my case, it was my mother... who used a
name she liked from when she lived in Europe whjich was, as required, also
the name of a saint.

So why does this name-calling persist? Are the participants invested in
some Lemon-Mathau "Grumpy Old Men" style of rivalry? �There are never any
emoticons or cues to the intensity of remarks so one can only conclude
that they are either done in animosity or in poorly-constructed mock
indignation, left up to the reader to deduce.

Michael

Michael

I agree with you. I see no need to abuse Eduardo on a personal level.
Now calling him an IBOC shill is fine because that is what he is.
What's next, rude comments about his mother?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

When I can think of one, I'll post it. Ah, remember that time Eduardo
called Brenda a Nazi?

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

In article ,
msg wrote:

From www.davidgleason.com:

I was born after the Second World War in Cleveland,
Ohio as David Frackelton Gleason. My second given name,
Eduardo, was bestowed upon my baptism.

Now, only by searching church records could one contest or
verify this assertion; considering that there seems to be
no accessible evidence to the contrary, why do folks
continue to question the validity of this name?

Perhaps David could comment: was this moniker bestowed
as 'Eduardo' or 'Edward' or 'Edouard' or some other
version of the name?

If indeed as he says it has always been Eduardo, then
there appears to be little justification for use of
pejoratives like 'faux hispanic'. I don't remember
seeing any claims for hispanic ancestry in Mr. Gleason's
web pages or in any posts in the N.G. either.

...Just would like to see an end to the incessant ad
hominem crap in this N.G.

This is all self perpetuated.
He is this news groups #2 Troll.
What part of this do you not understand?
Maybe you are trying for the 3rd slot?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

In article ,
msg wrote:

msg wrote:

From www.davidgleason.com:

I was born after the Second World War in Cleveland,

Ohio as David Frackelton Gleason. My second given name, Eduardo,
was bestowed upon my baptism.

Now, only by searching church records could one contest or verify
this assertion; considering that there seems to be no accessible
evidence to the contrary, why do folks continue to question the
validity of this name?

Perhaps David could comment: was this moniker bestowed as 'Eduardo'
or 'Edward' or 'Edouard' or some other version of the name?

I should have check the archives of this N.G.; from a post by 'David
Eduardo' in Feb. 2007:

My mother selected the name, and the godparents "gave it" at the
ceremony... as in "they gave the response" That's the way it is
done. The priest asks the godparents, "and what name have you
selected..." and the godparents respond. The person who decided on
the name can be the parents, or the whole family, I suppose. In my
case, it was my mother... who used a name she liked from when she
lived in Europe whjich was, as required, also the name of a saint.

So why does this name-calling persist? Are the participants invested
in some Lemon-Mathau "Grumpy Old Men" style of rivalry? There are
never any emoticons or cues to the intensity of remarks so one can
only conclude that they are either done in animosity or in
poorly-constructed mock indignation, left up to the reader to deduce.

Well Michael you picked an odd time to bring this up seeing as it has
died down. Maybe you are just bored? Troll someplace else.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

In article
,
wrote:

On Feb 23, 7:19?pm, msg wrote:
msg wrote:
?Fromwww.davidgleason.com:

I was born after the Second World War in Cleveland,

? Ohio as David Frackelton Gleason. My second given name,
? Eduardo, was bestowed upon my baptism.

Now, only by searching church records could one contest or
verify this assertion; considering that there seems to be
no accessible evidence to the contrary, why do folks
continue to question the validity of this name?

Perhaps David could comment: was this moniker bestowed
as 'Eduardo' or 'Edward' or 'Edouard' or some other
version of the name?

I should have check the archives of this N.G.; from a post
by 'David Eduardo' in Feb. 2007:

My mother selected the name, and the godparents "gave it" at the
ceremony... as in "they gave the response" That's the way it is done. The
priest asks the godparents, "and what name have you selected..." and the
godparents respond. The person who decided on the name can be the parents,
or the whole family, I suppose. In my case, it was my mother... who used a
name she liked from when she lived in Europe whjich was, as required, also
the name of a saint.

So why does this name-calling persist? Are the participants invested in
some Lemon-Mathau "Grumpy Old Men" style of rivalry? ?There are never any
emoticons or cues to the intensity of remarks so one can only conclude
that they are either done in animosity or in poorly-constructed mock
indignation, left up to the reader to deduce.

Michael

Michael- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Could you decipher that for us educated folks?

Yeah it's a Troll.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

"msg" wrote in message
...
From www.davidgleason.com:

I was born after the Second World War in Cleveland,
Ohio as David Frackelton Gleason. My second given name,
Eduardo, was bestowed upon my baptism.

Now, only by searching church records could one contest or
verify this assertion; considering that there seems to be
no accessible evidence to the contrary, why do folks
continue to question the validity of this name?

Perhaps David could comment: was this moniker bestowed
as 'Eduardo' or 'Edward' or 'Edouard' or some other
version of the name?

It came from the years my mother spent in Europe in the early 20's.

If indeed as he says it has always been Eduardo, then
there appears to be little justification for use of
pejoratives like 'faux hispanic'. I don't remember
seeing any claims for hispanic ancestry in Mr. Gleason's
web pages or in any posts in the N.G. either.

While the name is Spanish, a name does not make a person "Hispanic." The US
definition of the term shows "Hispanic" to be a cultural identifier, not an
ethnic or racial one (and this is supported by the fact that the "Hispanic
Question" in the Census is separate from the race question.). Since I have
lived in Latin America for more than 3/4 of my life, speak Spanish much more
than English, including in the home and with my children, I fit the
definition of "Hispanic" by virtue of culture. In simple terms, I have never
watched Seinfeld but never missed El Derecho de Nacer.

...Just would like to see an end to the incessant ad
hominem crap in this N.G.

It's a normal reaction to my comments on HD Radio and the death of AM, and,
consequentially, DX on the Medium wave band.

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

wrote in message
...
On Feb 23, 6:56?pm, msg wrote:
?Fromwww.davidgleason.com:

I was born after the Second World War in Cleveland,

? Ohio as David Frackelton Gleason. My second given name,
? Eduardo, was bestowed upon my baptism.

Now, only by searching church records could one contest or
verify this assertion; considering that there seems to be
no accessible evidence to the contrary, why do folks
continue to question the validity of this name?

Perhaps David could comment: was this moniker bestowed
as 'Eduardo' or 'Edward' or 'Edouard' or some other
version of the name?

If indeed as he says it has always been Eduardo, then
there appears to be little justification for use of
pejoratives like 'faux hispanic'. ?I don't remember
seeing any claims for hispanic ancestry in Mr. Gleason's
web pages or in any posts in the N.G. either.

...Just would like to see an end to the incessant ad
hominem crap in this N.G.

Michael

He used "Eduardo" to get a job with the now private, in-retreat
Univision, since he is only a high-scool dropout with a lousy podunk
GED.

Actually, I was employed by Hispanic Broadcasting Corp. and prior to that,
by Heftel Broadcasting which merged to form HBC. HBC was bought by
Univision, and I had been with the company for about 10 years then.

And, of course, you always neglect to mention that I dropped out of school
because I was bored to death, and built my own radio station, the first Top
40 station in South America. Idiots don't build #1 radio stations.

It is also going to make it harder for Univision to fire/layoff
him.

Why? 75% of our workforce is Hispanic. One more or one less is hardly
significant, and certainly not anything that makes me a member of a
protected class. In fact, the protected class I belong to is "making #1
radio stations" as I have always done; I hold a record in the US for having
programmed the FM station, in a top 50 market, with the longest run of
consecutive #1 ratings periods... 22 years.

Because of this, he feels very insecure, hense the need to
continually joist with us educated folk. Hell, my company wouldn't
even consider him, as they require at least a high school diploma and
US citizenship.

Fortunately, in my field we are talent driven and one's achievements, not
their education, are the most important factors. By the way, during the
several years I went to ASU, I got over 100 credits and a GPU of 4 and was
on the Deans List consistently.... not having a US High School Diploma
apparently did not matter much, did it?

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

Telamon wrote:

snip

So why does this name-calling persist? Are the participants invested
in some Lemon-Mathau "Grumpy Old Men" style of rivalry? There are
never any emoticons or cues to the intensity of remarks so one can
only conclude that they are either done in animosity or in
poorly-constructed mock indignation, left up to the reader to deduce.


Well Michael you picked an odd time to bring this up seeing as it has
died down. Maybe you are just bored? Troll someplace else.

I am just getting very disillusioned with the state of some Usenet
N.G.s that used to be informative and technically useful and have
become the arenas for bad behavior.

Suggestions to "ignore posts or threads" from certain originators
doesn't improve the S/N ratio, or make navigating any easier. The
ongoing noise level also dissuades new participants and repels
veterans.

There has been some recent discussion about reforming the charter
or at least the FAQ for this N.G.; I would like to see a clear
code of conduct as an amendment.

Look to comp.arch.embedded for a well behaved unmoderated N.G. with
truly outstanding participants and a lot of useful content.

Michael

(OT) : David Gleason's 'Baptismal' Moniker
 

On Feb 23, 3:56*pm, msg wrote:
-
- *Fromwww.davidgleason.com:
-
- I was born after the Second World War in Cleveland,
-
- Ohio as David Frackelton Gleason.
- My second given name, Eduardo, was bestowed upon my baptism.
-
- Now, only by searching church records could one contest
- or verify this assertion; considering that there seems to be
- no accessible evidence to the contrary, why do folks
- continue to question the validity of this name?
-
- Perhaps David could comment: was this moniker bestowed
- as 'Eduardo' or 'Edward' or 'Edouard' or some other
- version of the name?
-
- If indeed as he says it has always been Eduardo,
- then there appears to be little justification for use of
- pejoratives like 'faux hispanic'. *I don't remember
- seeing any claims for hispanic ancestry in Mr. Gleason's
- web pages or in any posts in the N.G. either.
-
- ...Just would like to see an end to the incessant ad
- hominem crap in this N.G.
-
- Michael
-

MSG - Hence my use of [ d'Eduardo ] ~ RHF

* The small [ d ] for who He was 'David'

* The [ ' ] Apostrophe Mark for "Of"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostro...-English_names

* The Name [Eduardo] {Personna} that He wishes
to be Called and Identified by/with related to the
Hispanic Acculturation that He can rightfully Claim.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acculturation

What's in a Name or for that matter a Set of Initials
like "RHF" with transmorphs into : King+Called+Fish
-aka- The KingFish :o} an old Chinese Engineer told
me that one many years ago.

IMHO - The Issue of His Name is a weak argumentative ploy
used by those who can not Debate with him on the Merrits
of His Numbers; or the Corporate Media perspective that he
represents. Being here for 'dEduardo is most likely a free form
open discussion which allows him to 'practice-his-craft'; and
discover a diverse set of points-of-view that he would not be
exposed to in the majority of professional 'business' settings
composed of many individuals like himself who are steeped
in the Radio Broadcasting Business.

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

In article ,
msg wrote:

Telamon wrote:

snip

So why does this name-calling persist? Are the participants invested
in some Lemon-Mathau "Grumpy Old Men" style of rivalry? There are
never any emoticons or cues to the intensity of remarks so one can
only conclude that they are either done in animosity or in
poorly-constructed mock indignation, left up to the reader to deduce.


Well Michael you picked an odd time to bring this up seeing as it has
died down. Maybe you are just bored? Troll someplace else.

I am just getting very disillusioned with the state of some Usenet
N.G.s that used to be informative and technically useful and have
become the arenas for bad behavior.

Suggestions to "ignore posts or threads" from certain originators
doesn't improve the S/N ratio, or make navigating any easier. The
ongoing noise level also dissuades new participants and repels
veterans.

There has been some recent discussion about reforming the charter
or at least the FAQ for this N.G.; I would like to see a clear
code of conduct as an amendment.

Look to comp.arch.embedded for a well behaved unmoderated N.G. with
truly outstanding participants and a lot of useful content.

I don't know what it will take to clean this news group up. Some people
that use the news group invite this kind of crap. This news group has
seen better days.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"msg" wrote in message
...
From www.davidgleason.com:

I was born after the Second World War in Cleveland,
Ohio as David Frackelton Gleason. My second given name,
Eduardo, was bestowed upon my baptism.

Now, only by searching church records could one contest or
verify this assertion; considering that there seems to be
no accessible evidence to the contrary, why do folks
continue to question the validity of this name?

Perhaps David could comment: was this moniker bestowed
as 'Eduardo' or 'Edward' or 'Edouard' or some other
version of the name?

It came from the years my mother spent in Europe in the early 20's.

SNIP

Oh crap. Let's again go over your whole life story again. Nobody cares.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Feb 23, 6:56?pm, msg wrote:
?Fromwww.davidgleason.com:

I was born after the Second World War in Cleveland,

SNIP

Look what you guys have done. I hope you are proud of yourselves.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

(OT) : David Gleason's 'Baptismal' Moniker
 

RHF wrote:

snip
Being here for 'dEduardo is most likely a free form
open discussion which allows him to 'practice-his-craft'; and
discover a diverse set of points-of-view that he would not be
exposed to in the majority of professional 'business' settings
composed of many individuals like himself who are steeped
in the Radio Broadcasting Business.

Indeed; thanks for your thoughts. Considering his biography,
this certainly is possible.

Michael

(OT) : David Gleason's 'Baptismal' Moniker
 

In article
,
RHF wrote:

On Feb 23, 3:56*pm, msg wrote:
-
- *Fromwww.davidgleason.com:

SNIP


Hey clueless, nobody cares about this. It has nothing to do with RRS.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

(OT) : David Gleason's 'Baptismal' Moniker
 

"RHF" wrote in message
...
Being here for 'dEduardo is most likely a free form
open discussion which allows him to 'practice-his-craft'; and
discover a diverse set of points-of-view that he would not be
exposed to in the majority of professional 'business' settings
composed of many individuals like himself who are steeped
in the Radio Broadcasting Business.

That's an insightful and quite correct assesment.

(OT) : David Gleason's 'Baptismal' Moniker
 

In article ,
msg wrote:

RHF wrote:

snip
Being here for 'dEduardo is most likely a free form
open discussion which allows him to 'practice-his-craft'; and
discover a diverse set of points-of-view that he would not be
exposed to in the majority of professional 'business' settings
composed of many individuals like himself who are steeped
in the Radio Broadcasting Business.

Indeed; thanks for your thoughts. Considering his biography,
this certainly is possible.


Yeah, his craft happens to be pulling the wool over peoples eyes.

The guy is full of himself and other slop.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

(OT) : David Gleason's 'Baptismal' Moniker
 

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article
,
RHF wrote:

On Feb 23, 3:56 pm, msg wrote:
-
- Fromwww.davidgleason.com:

SNIP


Hey clueless, nobody cares about this. It has nothing to do with RRS.


I've heard enough of your rants about how stations you can pick up should be
listened to by everyone and how if you can't find something on the internet,
it does not exist to know that you have serious problems. DXass can be
explained by his obvious substance problems, where his invective and insult
increase as each weekend wears on. What is behind your problems?

(OT) : David Gleason's 'Baptismal' Moniker
 

On Feb 23, 8:21*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article ,

*msg wrote:
RHF wrote:

snip
Being here for 'dEduardo is most likely a free form
open discussion which allows him to 'practice-his-craft'; and
discover a diverse set of points-of-view that he would not be
exposed to in the majority of professional 'business' settings
composed of many individuals like himself who are steeped
in the Radio Broadcasting Business.

Indeed; thanks for your thoughts. Considering his biography,
this certainly is possible.

- Yeah, his craft happens to be pulling the wool over peoples eyes.
-
- The guy is full of himself and other slop.
-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California

Telamon - Once again I am 'clueless' just who are you
denigrating now : d'Eduardo or Me {RHF} ~ RHF

(OT) : David Gleason's 'Baptismal' Moniker
 

On Feb 23, 5:12*pm, wrote:
-
- I agree with you. I see no need to abuse Eduardo on a
- personal level.
-
- Now calling him an IBOC shill is fine because that is what
- he is. What's next, rude comments about his mother?

M...Sushi,

Please do not demean d'Eduardo by simply calling him
an "IBOC shill".

Let us all show d'Eduado the respect that he justly deserves
for in-fact he is a "Highly Paid Professional IBOC $hill" ;-}

For those who are new to this Great Name Debacle about
none-other-than : David {Eduardo} Frackelton Gleason
here is a Link to his DEFG webpage :
DEFG - http://www.davidgleason.com/
David Gleason Spanish Language Radio Programming Consultant.

Please Note - That many of the Google Search Results
give Links to this Newsgroup and the Issue of his Name.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...kelton+Gleason

i am not a number -and- i do exist
even though i live well beyond . . .
the 10 mv/m contour - bcl-dx-u-all ~ RHF

(OT) : David Gleason's 'Baptismal' Moniker
 

"RHF" wrote in message
...
On Feb 23, 8:21 pm, Telamon
wrote:

- Yeah, his craft happens to be pulling the wool over peoples eyes.
-
- The guy is full of himself and other slop.
-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California

Telamon - Once again I am 'clueless' just who are you
denigrating now : d'Eduardo or Me {RHF} ~ RHF

He is an equal opportunity offender. He seems to think he is brighter than
anyone else, so, of course, nobody else is good enough-.

(OT) : David Gleason's 'Baptismal' Moniker
 

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"RHF" wrote in message
...
On Feb 23, 8:21 pm, Telamon
wrote:

- Yeah, his craft happens to be pulling the wool over peoples eyes.
-
- The guy is full of himself and other slop.
-

Telamon - Once again I am 'clueless' just who are you
denigrating now : d'Eduardo or Me {RHF} ~ RHF

He is an equal opportunity offender. He seems to think he is brighter than
anyone else, so, of course, nobody else is good enough-.
.

Yeah, and he just munged two more threads tonight, which is a favorite
trick of his to spread more crap threads in the news group.
Congratulations Eduardo you are now the subject of more threads.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

(OT) : David Gleason's 'Baptismal' Moniker
 

On Feb 23, 6:04Â*pm, wrote:
On Feb 23, 8:12�pm, wrote:





On Feb 23, 4:19 pm, msg wrote:

msg wrote:
�Fromwww.davidgleason.com:

I was born after the Second World War in Cleveland,

� Ohio as David Frackelton Gleason. My second given name,
� Eduardo, was bestowed upon my baptism.

Now, only by searching church records could one contest or
verify this assertion; considering that there seems to be
no accessible evidence to the contrary, why do folks
continue to question the validity of this name?

Perhaps David could comment: was this moniker bestowed
as 'Eduardo' or 'Edward' or 'Edouard' or some other
version of the name?

I should have check the archives of this N.G.; from a post
by 'David Eduardo' in Feb. 2007:

My mother selected the name, and the godparents "gave it" at the
ceremony... as in "they gave the response" That's the way it is done.. The
priest asks the godparents, "and what name have you selected..." and the
godparents respond. The person who decided on the name can be the parents,
or the whole family, I suppose. In my case, it was my mother... who used a
name she liked from when she lived in Europe whjich was, as required, also
the name of a saint.

So why does this name-calling persist? Are the participants invested in
some Lemon-Mathau "Grumpy Old Men" style of rivalry? �There are never any
emoticons or cues to the intensity of remarks so one can only conclude
that they are either done in animosity or in poorly-constructed mock
indignation, left up to the reader to deduce.

Michael

Michael

I agree with you. I see no need to abuse Eduardo on a personal level.
Now calling him an IBOC shill is fine because that is what he is.
What's next, rude comments about his mother?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

- When I can think of one, I'll post it.
- Ah, remember that time Eduardo called Brenda a Nazi?

Pocket Radio,

But "Fräulein Brenda" looks very good in a NAZI Uniform
http://www.strangepolitics.com/images/content/12930.jpg

just for the fun of it ~ RHF

(OT) : David Gleason's 'Baptismal' Moniker
 

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...

Now get it together and post those quotes.


Read msg's post from an hour or so ago.

I just answered it. Took you long enough to repost it. As far as I'm
concerned you can call yourself anything you want but you are still a BS
artist.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

(OT) : David Gleason's 'Baptismal' Moniker
 

RHF wrote:

But "Fräulein Brenda" looks very good in a NAZI Uniform
http://www.strangepolitics.com/images/content/12930.jpg


Having read her famous work, Mein Kramp, we must state our strongest
possible objections to your making light of a potentially great leader.





mike

(OT) : David Gleason's 'Baptismal' Moniker
 

On Feb 23, 7:06*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,





wrote:
On Feb 23, 7:19?pm, msg wrote:
msg wrote:
?Fromwww.davidgleason.com:

I was born after the Second World War in Cleveland,

? Ohio as David Frackelton Gleason. My second given name,
? Eduardo, was bestowed upon my baptism.

Now, only by searching church records could one contest or
verify this assertion; considering that there seems to be
no accessible evidence to the contrary, why do folks
continue to question the validity of this name?

Perhaps David could comment: was this moniker bestowed
as 'Eduardo' or 'Edward' or 'Edouard' or some other
version of the name?

I should have check the archives of this N.G.; from a post
by 'David Eduardo' in Feb. 2007:

My mother selected the name, and the godparents "gave it" at the
ceremony... as in "they gave the response" That's the way it is done.. The
priest asks the godparents, "and what name have you selected..." and the
godparents respond. The person who decided on the name can be the parents,
or the whole family, I suppose. In my case, it was my mother... who used a
name she liked from when she lived in Europe whjich was, as required, also
the name of a saint.

So why does this name-calling persist? Are the participants invested in
some Lemon-Mathau "Grumpy Old Men" style of rivalry? ?There are never any
emoticons or cues to the intensity of remarks so one can only conclude
that they are either done in animosity or in poorly-constructed mock
indignation, left up to the reader to deduce.

Michael

Michael- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Could you decipher that for us educated folks?
-
- Yeah it's a Troll.
-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California

Making You Telamon a "Trill" in the continued Game
of Newsgroup "Ping-Pong" with and about d'Eduardo.

~ RHF

(OT) : David Gleason's 'Baptismal' Moniker
 

On Feb 23, 7:06*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article ,





*msg wrote:
msg wrote:

*Fromwww.davidgleason.com:

I was born after the Second World War in Cleveland,

* Ohio as David Frackelton Gleason. My second given name, Eduardo,
* was bestowed upon my baptism.

Now, only by searching church records could one contest or verify
this assertion; considering that there seems to be no accessible
evidence to the contrary, why do folks continue to question the
validity of this name?

Perhaps David could comment: was this moniker bestowed as 'Eduardo'
or 'Edward' or 'Edouard' or some other version of the name?

I should have check the archives of this N.G.; from a post by 'David
Eduardo' in Feb. 2007:

My mother selected the name, and the godparents "gave it" at the
ceremony... as in "they gave the response" That's the way it is
done. The priest asks the godparents, "and what name have you
selected..." and the godparents respond. The person who decided on
the name can be the parents, or the whole family, I suppose. In my
case, it was my mother... who used a name she liked from when she
lived in Europe whjich was, as required, also the name of a saint.

So why does this name-calling persist? Are the participants invested
in some Lemon-Mathau "Grumpy Old Men" style of rivalry? *There are
never any emoticons or cues to the intensity of remarks so one can
only conclude that they are either done in animosity or in
poorly-constructed mock indignation, left up to the reader to deduce.

- Well Michael you picked an odd time to bring this up
- seeing as it has died down. Maybe you are just bored?
- Troll someplace else.
-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California
-

Making You Telamon a "Trill" in the continued Game
of Newsgroup "Ping-Pong" with and about d'Eduardo.

~ RHF

(OT) : David Gleason's 'Baptismal' Moniker
 

On Feb 23, 7:50*pm, msg wrote:
Telamon wrote:

snip

So why does this name-calling persist? Are the participants invested
in some Lemon-Mathau "Grumpy Old Men" style of rivalry? *There are
never any emoticons or cues to the intensity of remarks so one can
only conclude that they are either done in animosity or in
poorly-constructed mock indignation, left up to the reader to deduce.

Well Michael you picked an odd time to bring this up seeing as it has
died down. Maybe you are just bored? Troll someplace else.

- I am just getting very disillusioned with the state of some
- Usenet N.G.s that used to be informative and technically
- useful and have become the arenas for bad behavior.
-
- Suggestions to "ignore posts or threads" from certain
- originators doesn't improve the S/N ratio, or make navigating
- any easier. The ongoing noise level also dissuades new
- participants and repels veterans.
-
- There has been some recent discussion about reforming
- the charter or at least the FAQ for this N.G.; I would like
- to see a clear code of conduct as an amendment.
-
- Look to comp.arch.embedded for a well behaved unmoderated
- N.G. with truly outstanding participants and a lot of useful
content.
-
- Michael
-

MSG,

Nice Idea but . . .

Does No Good without a Core Group of Active Moderators
and an old-time UseNet Group like Rec.Radio.Shortwave is
not set-up to Moderate across all the possible entry-points
into it.

Requires a new forum that has a single entry-point and
is by-design a Moderated Group.

* Google Groups - http://groups.google.com/

* Yahoo! Groups - http://groups.yahoo.com/

+ plus their are many others . . .

Are two such Moderated Group Forums. ~ RHF

=PS= Telamon is ready to call everyone a "Troll" -but-
in-fact Telamon is himself a "Trill" in the continued Game
of Newsgroup "Ping-Pong" with and about d'Eduardo.
[ Ping-Pong ~ Trill-Troll ]

da trill of it all - pong ! ~ RHF

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

msg wrote:

From www.davidgleason.com:

I was born after the Second World War in Cleveland,
Ohio as David Frackelton Gleason. My second given name,
Eduardo, was bestowed upon my baptism.

Now, only by searching church records could one contest or
verify this assertion; considering that there seems to be
no accessible evidence to the contrary, why do folks
continue to question the validity of this name?

Why? Because it's merely something that he made up circa 2000. There are no
'church records', as Mr. Gleason is a liar and a fraud.

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


msg wrote:

From www.davidgleason.com:

I was born after the Second World War in Cleveland,
Ohio as David Frackelton Gleason. My second given name,
Eduardo, was bestowed upon my baptism.

Now, only by searching church records could one contest or
verify this assertion; considering that there seems to be
no accessible evidence to the contrary, why do folks
continue to question the validity of this name?

Why? Because it's merely something that he made up circa 2000. There are
no
'church records', as Mr. Gleason is a liar and a fraud.


And that is a position you have, despite your protestations, still to prove.

It's pretty much come down, today, to insults based on not having a US High
School diploma.... something I don't even give a **** about, let alone deny.
I'm actually quite proud of the reasons behind it... and your... and other's
inability to understand that marks you as narrow minded cogs in the
conformity machine.

This is playing out in a rather amusing manner. I think I can model several
characters after the traits you and several others have demonstrated... if I
ever get a chance to retire and write.

(OT) : Speaking of "Clueless" Behavior - Once Again It's Telamon !
 

On Feb 23, 8:16*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,

*RHF wrote:
On Feb 23, 3:56*pm, msg wrote:
-
- *Fromwww.davidgleason.com:

SNIP
-
- Hey clueless, nobody cares about this.
- It has nothing to do with RRS.
-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California

Telamon - Clueless ? - Now Just Who Is The Clueless One !

GET THE TIME-LINE AND THE FACTS STRAIGHT :

The Original Poster "MSG" started this Thread with a
Subject-Line : David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...c0fdc26c6de2ca

Then I Posted a Replied with an Amended Subject-Line :
(OT) : David Gleason's 'Baptismal' Moniker
Adding an (OT) : to the start of the subject-line.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...bb31ffc6623e34

1 - Telamon You Chose* to Relpy to a Message with an
(OT) at the Start of the Subject-Line and then made the
statement that you did.
* Now That Is Really "Clueless".

2 - Telamon You Then Chose* to Reply to Me {RHF} who
was by then just one of many Posters to the Thread :
Versus the Original Poster of the Thread
* Now That Is Really "Clueless".

=PS= Telamon - You Whimped-Out Afraid to Alienate yet
Another Newsgroup Member with Your Personal Attacks }

3 - But you are wrong, Wrong. WRONG ! - It does in-fact have
something to do with the Rec.Radio.Shortwave Newsgroup.
Because of the Endless and Repetitive Ping-Pong Game of
Bashing David Frackelton Gleason -aka- "Eduardo" some days
and weeks amounts to 50% of the Posts to this Newsgroup.
Hello Telamon - You are one of the Major Players* in this
Ping-Pong Game.
* Which is Really CLUELESS Behavior.

READ - What About : The d'Eduardo "Ping-Pong" Players List ?
http://www.tabletennisdayton.com/graphics/pingy2.jpg
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...b402a4ed9a106a
I thought that with DX Ace gone; that you Telamon might
have improved you 'position' in the Rankings of the Players
in the d'Eduardo "Ping-Pong" Players List -but- It now would
appear that DX Ace is back - - - Welcome Back DX Ace :-}
and clearly you are not up to DX Ace's level of Ping-Pong Play.

In Summary Telamon - There is a clear and consistant
pattern of action on your part in Posting here on RRS
that is Beyond Clueless : It is Newsgroup Ping-Pong !
http://www.misterpp.com/pix/Ping_Pong_Ball3.jpg

teli-baby - you are such a yo-yo ~ RHF
http://www.centurynovelty.com/catIma...-222_large.jpg
http://laughingsquid.com/images/yo-yo.jpg

(OT) : Hey Everyone DX Ace Is Back !
 

On Feb 23, 11:13*pm, dxAce wrote:
-
- Why?
- Because it's merely something that he made up circa 2000.
- There are no 'church records', as Mr. Gleason is a liar
- and a fraud.
-

(OT) : Hey Everyone DX Ace Is Back !

Welcome Back DX Ace :o) ~ RHF

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

dxAcehole said on his fifth annual farewell tour:

You built nothing.

That was right after he Lied His Effin Ass Off :

============================
I really don't want to say this, my many shortwave friends, but I find
that I am giving up far to much of my increasingly valuable time here
on RRS trying to educate the faux, the debutantes, and those who tote..

Therefore, I've simply decided to give up RRS.

Goodbye, I sincerely hope that you all find your niche in the world of SW.

dxAce
Michigan
USA
=============================

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

dxAcehole, pathological liar, during his fifth annual farewell tour, said:

Yep, us normal folk certainly have an inability to understand pathological liars
such as yourself.



===========================================
-------- Original Message --------
From: - Sat Feb 16 00:52:22 2008

I really don't want to say this, my many shortwave friends, but I find
that I am giving up far to much of my increasingly valuable time here
on RRS trying to educate the faux, the debutantes, and those who tote..

Therefore, I've simply decided to give up RRS.

Goodbye, I sincerely hope that you all find your niche in the world of SW.

dxAce
Michigan
USA
===========================================

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
msg wrote:

Telamon wrote:

snip

So why does this name-calling persist? Are the participants invested
in some Lemon-Mathau "Grumpy Old Men" style of rivalry? There are
never any emoticons or cues to the intensity of remarks so one can
only conclude that they are either done in animosity or in
poorly-constructed mock indignation, left up to the reader to deduce.

Well Michael you picked an odd time to bring this up seeing as it has
died down. Maybe you are just bored? Troll someplace else.
I am just getting very disillusioned with the state of some Usenet
N.G.s that used to be informative and technically useful and have
become the arenas for bad behavior.

Suggestions to "ignore posts or threads" from certain originators
doesn't improve the S/N ratio, or make navigating any easier. The
ongoing noise level also dissuades new participants and repels
veterans.

There has been some recent discussion about reforming the charter
or at least the FAQ for this N.G.; I would like to see a clear
code of conduct as an amendment.

Look to comp.arch.embedded for a well behaved unmoderated N.G. with
truly outstanding participants and a lot of useful content.

I don't know what it will take to clean this news group up. Some people
that use the news group invite this kind of crap. This news group has
seen better days.


No damn sunspots, no damn shortwave.

David Gleason's 'baptismal' moniker
 

dxAcehole, pathological liar and common drunk, during his fifth annual
farewell tour, said:


Write? One thing is certain, 'Eduardo'... They'll be great works of
fiction!


You would be the MASTER of fiction, Bozo.



===========================================
-------- Original Message --------
From: - Sat Feb 16 00:52:22 2008

I really don't want to say this, my many shortwave friends, but I find
that I am giving up far to much of my increasingly valuable time here
on RRS trying to educate the faux, the debutantes, and those who tote..

Therefore, I've simply decided to give up RRS.

Goodbye, I sincerely hope that you all find your niche in the world of SW.

dxAce
Michigan
USA
===========================================

(OT) : David Gleason's 'Baptismal' Moniker
 

David Eduardo wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article
,
RHF wrote:

On Feb 23, 3:56 pm, msg wrote:
-
- Fromwww.davidgleason.com:
SNIP


Hey clueless, nobody cares about this. It has nothing to do with RRS.


I've heard enough of your rants about how stations you can pick up should be
listened to by everyone and how if you can't find something on the internet,
it does not exist to know that you have serious problems. DXass can be
explained by his obvious substance problems, where his invective and insult
increase as each weekend wears on. What is behind your problems?


Incomprehensible...