Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Radioguy wrote:
Yes, I agree. Side by side there would probably be a few situations where each of those receivers would excel by a small margin on HF. The 9500 might be a bargain if measured by the price-per-button. The 9500 is a bargain if you have the money and want that extra margin in the situations it excels at. If it makes the difference between having every possible DXCC country in your log and not, or getting that one extra contact for a contest, it's worth it. Since this is an SWL group, let's face it, that extra margin is probably of no concern to an SWL. In the real world a $200 portable with a $5 wire probably will "bag" you 95% of what is out there when it is there, so the difference in price does not buy you much. Did you know there is a ham out there with a 20m (14mHz) 10 element beam antenna? I'm sure he could use one. :-) If you don't know the math, my 11 element 2m beam antenna was 6 feet wide, by 12 feet long. Multiply that by 10. At least they made the thing look and feel like a radio, instead of an expensive VoIP box. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 Visit my 'blog at http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NIST Makes Astounding Discovery | Homebrew | |||
Last Word on The Colonel | Shortwave | |||
The Word is out that . . | Shortwave | |||
WOrd on Air Flights | Shortwave | |||
You may now use the "F" word on the air | Antenna |