David Frackelton Gleason, posing as 'Eduardo', the faux Hispanic, wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Mar 20, 11:05 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Scooter" wrote in message

.. .

Terrestrial radio's biggest problem is retaining advertising revenues
as
more ad dollars are siphoned by the internet. In 2007 total ad dollars
for
radio fell to where they were in 2003. That point to an industry going
backwards, not forward, Cramer said.
The average market cap of terrestrial radio companies has declined by a
staggering 80% over the last five years. But the bottom isn't even in
yet,
as far as Cramer can tell
Either way, the bottom line remains the same. Cramer expects the
terrestrial
radio companies to go down harder than almost anything else and he
would
not
own any of them under any condition right now.

Of course, Cramer is barely right half the time. His advice is more
entertaining screaming and diatribe than useful.

Hey NAMBLA dude, where have you been hiding?

A rather simple inspection of the message headers will show that the "dude"
in question is an imposter.

Aren't you associated with SAMBLA? (South American Man Boy Love Association)

On Mar 21, 5:42*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message

...





On Mar 20, 11:05 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Scooter" wrote in message

...

Terrestrial radio's biggest problem is retaining advertising revenues
as
more ad dollars are siphoned by the internet. In 2007 total ad dollars
for
radio fell to where they were in 2003. That point to an industry going
backwards, not forward, Cramer said.
The average market cap of terrestrial radio companies has declined by a
staggering 80% over the last five years. But the bottom isn't even in
yet,
as far as Cramer can tell
Either way, the bottom line remains the same. Cramer expects the
terrestrial
radio companies to go down harder than almost anything else and he
would
not
own any of them under any condition right now.

Of course, Cramer is barely right half the time. His advice is more
entertaining screaming and diatribe than useful.

Hey NAMBLA dude, where have you been hiding?

A rather simple inspection of the message headers will show that the "dude"
in question is an imposter.

Or that you intentionally posted via a different ip address so that
you could later, if necessary, avail yourself of this very excuse. An
old hat technique.


But, what the hell, you seem to believe it so I do have a reasonable idea of
your perceptive abilities and IQ.- Hide quoted text -


Still probably greater than your six year old lover's. How's little
Billy doing today, anyway?

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Your "IQ" is just something else you made up, right, Gleason?



Started your weekend drinking binge, I see.

In article
,
RHF wrote:

On Mar 20, 8:02*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article
,

*RHF wrote:
- - Scooter,
- -
- - Did you know by mentioning "Jim Cramer" and Cramer
- - three times you generated these Google Sponsored Links :
-
- SNIP

RESNIP RHF crap

So I noticed you did not answer the question are you a curse on the news
group or just a spamming trolling idiot? Which is it?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article
,
Rfburns wrote:

On Mar 21, 1:23 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Rfburns" wrote in message

...



On Mar 20, 10:05 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Scooter" wrote in message

...

Terrestrial radio's biggest problem is retaining advertising revenues
as
more ad dollars are siphoned by the internet. In 2007 total ad dollars
for
radio fell to where they were in 2003. That point to an industry going
backwards, not forward, Cramer said.
The average market cap of terrestrial radio companies has declined by a
staggering 80% over the last five years. But the bottom isn't even in
yet,
as far as Cramer can tell
Either way, the bottom line remains the same. Cramer expects the
terrestrial
radio companies to go down harder than almost anything else and he
would
not
own any of them under any condition right now.

Of course, Cramer is barely right half the time. His advice is more
entertaining screaming and diatribe than useful.

Once again - Eduardo, you're an expert on everything. Amazing!

There are plenty of sites that track Cramer's "advice" to show that it is
mediocre at best.

amazing!

He has the psychic ability to tell you what you can hear on your radio.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
"MNMikew" wrote:

"Scooter" wrote in message
.. .
Terrestrial radio's biggest problem is retaining advertising revenues as
more ad dollars are siphoned by the internet. In 2007 total ad dollars for
radio fell to where they were in 2003. That point to an industry going
backwards, not forward, Cramer said.
The average market cap of terrestrial radio companies has declined by a
staggering 80% over the last five years. But the bottom isn't even in yet,
as far as Cramer can tell
Either way, the bottom line remains the same. Cramer expects the
terrestrial
radio companies to go down harder than almost anything else and he would
not
own any of them under any condition right now.

Here's the video - http://www.cnbc.com/id/23558686/from/ET/

Cramer is the biggest dumbass in the financial world!

And you are the biggest dumb ass posting to this news group.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Your "IQ" is just something else you made up, right, Gleason?



Started your weekend drinking binge, I see.




Which raises the question....why would you waste your time?

You dismiss him as irrelevant. You dismiss him as alcoholic.

And yet...you're the one who engages him.


Hmmmmm...



Kinda raises another question. Doesn't it.


Given your stated disdain for DXers, it is quite the curiosity that
you spend so much time arguing with them.

Like Steve...you dismiss them as irrelevant. You blame them for the
deterioration of their relationship with broadcasters...and yet you
regularly engage them.



Hmmmmmm...



A person in your position would seem to have better uses for his
time. Unless, like another poster here, who faded away about the time of
your appearance, your bickering here is fodder for some discussions
outside of the group.

Which then raises more significant questions.

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

Which raises the question....why would you waste your time?

You dismiss him as irrelevant. You dismiss him as alcoholic.

And yet...you're the one who engages him.

If you had been on a high school or college debate team, you would
understand.

Given your stated disdain for DXers, it is quite the curiosity that you
spend so much time arguing with them.

I have a disdain for DXers who have a disdain for broadcasters. Big
difference.

Like Steve...you dismiss them as irrelevant. You blame them for the
deterioration of their relationship with broadcasters...and yet you
regularly engage them.

.... because it is fun.

A person in your position would seem to have better uses for his time.

I find this a rather entertaining diversion from that very same position.

Unless, like another poster here, who faded away about the time of your
appearance, your bickering here is fodder for some discussions outside of
the group.

How nice to be able to foment conversation.

Which then raises more significant questions.

Nothing on a news group is truly significant. It's backyard gossip over a
(fire) wall.

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:


"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

Which raises the question....why would you waste your time?

You dismiss him as irrelevant. You dismiss him as alcoholic.

And yet...you're the one who engages him.

If you had been on a high school or college debate team, you would
understand.

SNIP

Most people shun debaters. You would think you would have learned that
by now.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:


"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...

Which raises the question....why would you waste your time?

You dismiss him as irrelevant. You dismiss him as alcoholic.

And yet...you're the one who engages him.

If you had been on a high school or college debate team, you would
understand.

SNIP

Most people shun debaters. You would think you would have learned that
by now.

This is documented where? In your rigid inflexible mind?