Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 22, 11:10*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message .... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: Right, and that's another lie. You infer from data you supposedly use professionally to dictate what signal levels I get, which according to you are so weak nobody will listen to them but the truth is otherwise. Since you fabricate the whole thing what does it matter, right? We have been over this before, but here it is again. We take indivisual stations, and we use Arbitron's MapMaker(tm) program and have it plot the diary mentions (mention is the term of the trade for a single entry indicating listening to a station in a single diary representing one person) for at work and at home listening. Car listening, which is the lesser of the three locations, is not identifiable by location and excluded. This can be done in the Arbitron software down to the ZIP Code level. We then superimpose over the map a set of contours... let's say 25 mV/m, and then 20, 15., 10, 5, 2.5 and 1 mV/M per FCC data, for the station. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio now officially DEAD at Radio Shack | Equipment | |||
EDUARDO - Jim Cramer spits in Radio's face | Shortwave | |||
Future Radio - terrestrial radio is dying, HD Radio is dead! | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio now officially DEAD at Radio Shack | Equipment |