Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
D Peter Maus wrote:
David Eduardo wrote: "Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote in message . .. [snip] The first generation is a description of the pre-FCC authorization receivers. Second generation is what is out now, and thirds is what you will see in Q3 to Q4. OK, so what's the actual difference between these generations? Hardware? Software? Chipset, software. And which of these generations are ready for subscription radio? None. I have never heard subscription radio talked about, in fact. Most subscription based services are using other technologies. David, David, David...now that's in direct conflict to something discussed here a year ago. A conversation YOU chimed in on and admitted that conditional access has been under test. Now, c'mon...you may be busy, but you're not so busy you can'r remember your own participation in a conversation on a worldwide forum. Are you? Or is there another reason you conveniently forgot? Peter, what makes you think David is busy? he seems to live here on this newsgroup 24/7. Drifter... -- "Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Eduardo - Arbitron ratings are a farce, too! | Shortwave | |||
Eduardo - Arbitron ratings are a farce, too! | Shortwave | |||
Q for Eduardo - Does Arbitron monitor non-commercial? | Shortwave | |||
"Study: HD Radio's 'Tepid Growth Story'" - Ha! Ha! Eduardo & RHF! | Shortwave | |||
arbitron summaries | Broadcasting |