LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old April 16th 08, 02:35 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,817
Default Eduardo is just angry about the latest Arbitron study of the HD Radio farce


"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
iBiquity simply confirmed that the HD system was capable of
addressing receivers were this a requested feature. At present, I
do not believe any radio in production is addressable.


.

Nice try. That's not the suject of this convesation. And your continuing
attempt to divert the discussion to your denials of fact
say a lot about the intent of much of what you've posted in this
forum.



Right now, no chip and no receiver is adressable. in other words,
there is no way in hell to do paid services on HD today or in the
near future.



ROFLMAO.

Still avoiding the point. You're denying today what iBiquity
themselves have publicly have stated as a goal. And are currently
testing. And that's AUDIO, David. Not just data.


I have never heard the supposed chant that the goal is to go all digital.
iBiquity made the system backward compatible on AM and FM, in fact. It's the
FCC that has spoken of an all digital world. I don't know of a single person
in radio who wants this today.



"Services that could be made possible through RadioGuard include

pay-per-listen options for live concerts or other events, improved
reading services for the blind, private channels for emergency services,
and free opt-in events sponsored by advertisers. So HD Radio will not
just be competing with satellite radio for listening time, but soon will
be competing for subscription dollars as well."


"Could" means the sytem can be designed in the future to do such things. So
far, there is no broadcaster interest, as things like FMeXtra are more
attractive options and compatible with HD.


iBiquity themselves are proving you're not as intimately connected as
you claim. Which make your arguments shilling HD are largely irrelevant,
as either mis- or dis- information.


The system, the chips, the radios, the transmitters are all incompatible
which subscription services today. iBiquity can tell us that they can make
transmitters fly and oink like pigs, but unless we, the broadcasters, want
it, it will not be implemented.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Eduardo - Arbitron ratings are a farce, too! IBOCcrock Shortwave 2 October 9th 07 06:20 PM
Eduardo - Arbitron ratings are a farce, too! IBOCcrock Shortwave 0 October 9th 07 05:55 PM
Q for Eduardo - Does Arbitron monitor non-commercial? [email protected] Shortwave 2 October 1st 07 12:04 PM
"Study: HD Radio's 'Tepid Growth Story'" - Ha! Ha! Eduardo & RHF! RHF Shortwave 0 September 13th 07 08:18 AM
arbitron summaries David Eduardo Broadcasting 1 July 24th 03 05:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017