Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: iBiquity simply confirmed that the HD system was capable of addressing receivers were this a requested feature. At present, I do not believe any radio in production is addressable. . Nice try. That's not the suject of this convesation. And your continuing attempt to divert the discussion to your denials of fact say a lot about the intent of much of what you've posted in this forum. Right now, no chip and no receiver is adressable. in other words, there is no way in hell to do paid services on HD today or in the near future. ROFLMAO. Still avoiding the point. You're denying today what iBiquity themselves have publicly have stated as a goal. And are currently testing. And that's AUDIO, David. Not just data. I have never heard the supposed chant that the goal is to go all digital. iBiquity made the system backward compatible on AM and FM, in fact. It's the FCC that has spoken of an all digital world. I don't know of a single person in radio who wants this today. "Services that could be made possible through RadioGuard include pay-per-listen options for live concerts or other events, improved reading services for the blind, private channels for emergency services, and free opt-in events sponsored by advertisers. So HD Radio will not just be competing with satellite radio for listening time, but soon will be competing for subscription dollars as well." "Could" means the sytem can be designed in the future to do such things. So far, there is no broadcaster interest, as things like FMeXtra are more attractive options and compatible with HD. iBiquity themselves are proving you're not as intimately connected as you claim. Which make your arguments shilling HD are largely irrelevant, as either mis- or dis- information. The system, the chips, the radios, the transmitters are all incompatible which subscription services today. iBiquity can tell us that they can make transmitters fly and oink like pigs, but unless we, the broadcasters, want it, it will not be implemented. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Eduardo - Arbitron ratings are a farce, too! | Shortwave | |||
Eduardo - Arbitron ratings are a farce, too! | Shortwave | |||
Q for Eduardo - Does Arbitron monitor non-commercial? | Shortwave | |||
"Study: HD Radio's 'Tepid Growth Story'" - Ha! Ha! Eduardo & RHF! | Shortwave | |||
arbitron summaries | Broadcasting |