Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 7, 9:50*am, wrote:
"Editorial: More Than Half Full" "AM-HD continues to fight uphill. Several manufacturers showed impressive new transmitter models designed to optimize and maintain HD performance. Yet the growth of AM-HD stations coming on the air appears stalled and we hear murmurings about some broadcasters pulling back on AM-HD or wishing to renegotiate their commitments with Ibiquity. That does not bode well as the AM service struggles to remain relevant." http://www.rwonline.com/pages/s.0044/t.13363.html Just in from RW. Of course, RW's snivelling little implication that HD will somehow save AM - oh please, AM is dying, even though ratings say otherwise for many of the larger AM stations (not directed at you, Bob). *Of course, FM is under attack by iPods, etc, and in five years when iPod jacks are standard in every new vehicle, what is FM going to do. Oh I know - FM-HD to the rescue! So, HD was supposed to bring analog into the new digital age, but I guess that will only apply to FM. So much for any potential HD mandate (oh, I guess the crooked FCC could mandate a technology that doesn't work). Broadcasters must be getting tired of paying those on-going fees to iBiquity, with no ROI. Dah! Welcome back on the flip-flop IBOCcrock ;-} ~ RHF |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 7, 1:12�pm, RHF wrote:
On May 7, 9:50�am, wrote: "Editorial: More Than Half Full" "AM-HD continues to fight uphill. Several manufacturers showed impressive new transmitter models designed to optimize and maintain HD performance. Yet the growth of AM-HD stations coming on the air appears stalled and we hear murmurings about some broadcasters pulling back on AM-HD or wishing to renegotiate their commitments with Ibiquity. That does not bode well as the AM service struggles to remain relevant." http://www.rwonline.com/pages/s.0044/t.13363.html Just in from RW. Of course, RW's snivelling little implication that HD will somehow save AM - oh please, AM is dying, even though ratings say otherwise for many of the larger AM stations (not directed at you, Bob). �Of course, FM is under attack by iPods, etc, and in five years when iPod jacks are standard in every new vehicle, what is FM going to do. Oh I know - FM-HD to the rescue! So, HD was supposed to bring analog into the new digital age, but I guess that will only apply to FM. So much for any potential HD mandate (oh, I guess the crooked FCC could mandate a technology that doesn't work). Broadcasters must be getting tired of paying those on-going fees to iBiquity, with no ROI. Dah! Welcome back on the flip-flop IBOCcrock ;-} ~ RHF �.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Thanks! Don't you have a challenge for me? ;-) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 7, 10:44Â*am, wrote:
On May 7, 1:12�pm, RHF wrote: On May 7, 9:50�am, wrote: "Editorial: More Than Half Full" "AM-HD continues to fight uphill. Several manufacturers showed impressive new transmitter models designed to optimize and maintain HD performance. Yet the growth of AM-HD stations coming on the air appears stalled and we hear murmurings about some broadcasters pulling back on AM-HD or wishing to renegotiate their commitments with Ibiquity. That does not bode well as the AM service struggles to remain relevant." http://www.rwonline.com/pages/s.0044/t.13363.html Just in from RW. Of course, RW's snivelling little implication that HD will somehow save AM - oh please, AM is dying, even though ratings say otherwise for many of the larger AM stations (not directed at you, Bob). �Of course, FM is under attack by iPods, etc, and in five years when iPod jacks are standard in every new vehicle, what is FM going to do. Oh I know - FM-HD to the rescue! So, HD was supposed to bring analog into the new digital age, but I guess that will only apply to FM. So much for any potential HD mandate (oh, I guess the crooked FCC could mandate a technology that doesn't work). Broadcasters must be getting tired of paying those on-going fees to iBiquity, with no ROI. Dah! Welcome back on the flip-flop IBOCcrock ;-} ~ RHF �.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - - Thanks! Don't you have a challenge for me? ;-) OK - Look in a Mirror and simply Smile ;-} ~ RHF |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
(OT) Bush Flip-Flop | Shortwave | |||
(OT) Another Flip Flop | Shortwave | |||
Bush's Deceitful Flip-Flop on Cost of War | Shortwave |