Big 89 Rewind
 

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:

OK, here is one for you: How many people have the close of escrow papers
for homes they have not owned for 40 years? For most people, the house is
the biggest investment they would ever make, yet probably 99.9% of people
do not keep that kind of paperwork.

I do. I have all the records from every car I've ever owned.

That indicates why you think others would have similar papers. Most people,
the vast majority of them, don't.

Once a year has passed when I dispose of a car, I dispose of the papers.
That's beyond my limit of any liability, so good riddance. And I must have
had 35 to 40 cars over the years, too Houses, maybe two to three years. And
I've had about 12 or 13 of those. And so on.

I even have my grandfather's from the house in River Forest.

You are, perchance, related to a family of pack rats?

Big 89 Rewind
 

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...
D Peter Maus wrote:
Time for some MAJOR damage control to cover that one.
Heck, he'll just come back with MAJOR lies. Nothing new.

Nobody today keeps documents beyond legal retention requirements. With
the cost of record retention (space, logistics, etc.) nobody wants a
museum in their radio station.
Not entirely true, David.

True enough for the exceptions to be unusual.




If they are exceptions unusual.

That hasn't been determined.

Big 89 Rewind
 

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
OK, here is one for you: How many people have the close of escrow papers
for homes they have not owned for 40 years? For most people, the house is
the biggest investment they would ever make, yet probably 99.9% of people
do not keep that kind of paperwork.
I do. I have all the records from every car I've ever owned.

That indicates why you think others would have similar papers. Most people,
the vast majority of them, don't.


M
Once a year has passed when I dispose of a car, I dispose of the papers.
That's beyond my limit of any liability, so good riddance. And I must have
had 35 to 40 cars over the years, too Houses, maybe two to three years. And
I've had about 12 or 13 of those. And so on.
I even have my grandfather's from the house in River Forest.

You are, perchance, related to a family of pack rats?


Clever. You are, perchance, related to a family of traitors?

Big 89 Rewind
 

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...

When nearly nobody in the 18-34 demo in the US listens to Rush or any
other
political talker, why would they listen when abroad?

Nice spin. People that call in to the program don't sound over 50. They
sound like they are 20 to 40 years old. Mom's with kids and many topics
revolve around kids, school.

The call screeners purposely exclude the dangerous blue-haired women and
senile old men, and purposely pick people in the youngest demos. They know
that 9 out of 10 over 55 callers will want to talk about social security and
Medicare, and they diligently keep these callers off the air. You don't
really think these shows let anyone at all on the air, do you?

Since they can fill the shows with 20 to 40 years old middle aged people
then they must be the a big proportion of the listeners. Most of the
commercials are aimed at the middle class, middle age group.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Big 89 Rewind
 

On Jun 1, 4:28*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...







David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

David Eduardo wrote:

What part of the fact that the AFRTS stations were operating illegally
in
a
US territory don't you get? The local broadcasters association formed
a
committee to investigate the operational restrictions on AFRTS
stations
inside the US and its territories and filed a complaint with the AFRTS
board
as well as with the FCC as an interested party and prevailed, getting
the
two offending stations closed. An in-compliance limited signal FM at
the
now-closed submarine base at Naguabo continued operation as it did not
put a
significant signal off base and was judged to be within the spirit of
the
AFRTS operational dictates.

As always, 'Eduardo, I think you're full of ****. You've been full of
****
for
quite a number of years, not only here, but in numerous radio clubs
throughout
our great land.

The fact is that the PRBA got the AFRTS stations closed down for
operating
outside the parameters of such a station.

- - Well, maybe it's time to cut PR loose, let them go on their own.

- You can't revoke the citizenship of 8 million Americans.

d'Eduardo,

The US Congress 'granted' US Citizenship to the Residents
of Puerto Rico and the US Congress 'could' take it away.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publicat...k/geos/rq.html
http://www.worldatlas.com/webimage/c.../caribb/pr.htm

But - More importantly the peoples of the "Commonwealth"
of Puerto Rico can by simply Voting to be an Independent
Nation -and- Say Bye-Bye to US Citizenship [.]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rico

You know there is a 'thing' called "Puerto Rican Citizenship"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Puerto_Rico

~ RHF
-ps- 200 Mile Fishing and Oil Exploration Zones.
http://www.npr.org/healthscience/ima...ocean.map2.gif

Big 89 Rewind
 

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message
.
..
When nearly nobody in the 18-34 demo in the US listens to Rush or any
other
political talker, why would they listen when abroad?
Nice spin. People that call in to the program don't sound over 50. They
sound like they are 20 to 40 years old. Mom's with kids and many topics
revolve around kids, school.

The call screeners purposely exclude the dangerous blue-haired women and
senile old men, and purposely pick people in the youngest demos. They
know that 9 out of 10 over 55 callers will want to talk about social
security and Medicare, and they diligently keep these callers off the
air. You don't really think these shows let anyone at all on the air, do
you?


"Nearly nobody in the 18-34 demo in the US listens to Rush,"

And then: "The call screeners purposely exclude the dangerous blue-haired
women and senile old men, and purposely pick people in the youngest
demos."


You're contradicting yourself, again. If they're not listening, they
can't be calling.

"Youngest demos" for talk is generally 35-44.

I hear people in their twenties all the time. Many are servicemen or the
wives of serviceman.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Big 89 Rewind
 

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
... The
pride with which Gleason asserts his part in getting two AFRTS
stations closed only underscores the assertion sometime back that the
only thing we've ever heard him renounce is his citizenship.


The driving force in closing AFRTS Ramey and AFRTS Buchanan was the PRBA
which objected, on legal grounds, to those stations covering way too much
of the civilian population when an LPFM would suffice. Considering that,
at the time, the environmental damage and health risk the Navy was
putting the Municipality of Vieques through at the time, the PRBA was
rather adamant about this invasion of Puerto Rican airwaves by the US
military.





Once again, you demonstrate my point for me.

If the point is to show how many ugly things the US has done abroad, then
that's right.

That's pretty offensive Eduardo. Why don't you just head back to South
America. We don't need your kind in the USA.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Big 89 Rewind
 

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...



That's totally illegal. The proof is that both switched to low power FM
when
the PRBA presented its case.

You were just upset because they wouldn't let you pretend that you owned
them...


You sound like the drunk soldiers the Puerto Rican police had to pick up all
the time around the bases on the Island. 24 hours of dry out before handing
them over to the MP wagon usually brought them back to normal. I would
imagine you will try to dry out tomorrow so you can work up the energy to go
to the liquor store to buy some cheap stuff for next weekend.

Again that's pretty offensive. Time to head back to South America or
anywhere except the USA. How about Canada? Mike has a spare room.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Big 89 Rewind
 

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:


What part of the fact that the AFRTS stations were operating
illegally in a US territory don't you get? The local
broadcasters association formed a committee to investigate the
operational restrictions on AFRTS stations inside the US and
its territories and filed a complaint with the AFRTS board as
well as with the FCC as an interested party and prevailed,
getting the two offending stations closed. An in-compliance
limited signal FM at the now-closed submarine base at Naguabo
continued operation as it did not put a significant signal off
base and was judged to be within the spirit of the AFRTS
operational dictates.

As always, 'Eduardo, I think you're full of ****. You've been
full of **** for quite a number of years, not only here, but in
numerous radio clubs throughout our great land.


The fact is that the PRBA got the AFRTS stations closed down for
operating outside the parameters of such a station.

Well, maybe it's time to cut PR loose, let them go on their own.

You can't revoke the citizenship of 8 million Americans.

Sure you can. I think you would make a good test case.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Big 89 Rewind
 

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


ABC could likely not produce the papers proving it owned WABC in 1964.
No
document retention rules or laws or guidances even suggest document
retention beyond a decade or so. This is more than 40 years!

And yet, you yourself, have documents on your very own website older than
40
years.

Nice try, oh faux one. But, it ain't playing in Peoria.

Come on boy, where's your quick response?

Like I said, even the FCC does not retain records beyond, in most cases, the
late 70's. If there are any US stations continuously owned since the 60's, I
doubt most could prove the original license grant or transfer.

Evasive yet again. Nice try, oh faux one. Like I said before, It ain't playing
in Peoria.

It does not play in Ventura, California either.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Big 89 Rewind
 

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


D Peter Maus wrote:

Time for some MAJOR damage control to cover that one.

Heck, he'll just come back with MAJOR lies. Nothing new.


Nobody today keeps documents beyond legal retention requirements. With the
cost of record retention (space, logistics, etc.) nobody wants a museum in
their radio station.

Looks like it is time for you to head back to Ecuador and straighten out
your past.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Big 89 Rewind
 

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:


"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...
ABC could likely not produce the papers proving it owned WABC in 1964.
No
document retention rules or laws or guidances even suggest document
retention beyond a decade or so. This is more than 40 years!
And yet, you yourself, have documents on your very own website older
than 40
years.

Nice try, oh faux one. But, it ain't playing in Peoria.
Come on boy, where's your quick response?

Like I said, even the FCC does not retain records beyond, in most cases,
the late 70's. If there are any US stations continuously owned since the
60's, I doubt most could prove the original license grant or transfer.


Every radio station I've ever worked had documentation back to the first
days. Even WDZ, Decatur, had it's Instruments of Authorization from the
days when it was an experimental, owned by a grain elevator operator in
Tuscola.

None of the 75 or so I work with has much going back beyond legal record
retention requirements. In fact, most companies have document disposal rules
that require disposal of old papers beyond a certain point to avoid
everything from fire hazards to the rental of excess storage facilities.

SNIP

You have reasons to shred documents that most people don't have.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Big 89 Rewind
 

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:


"dxAce" wrote in message
...


No, it is a Military station intended to serve, and only serve, military
personnel on base. In fact, in US territories where the FCC licenses
stations, they are not supposed to get any signal off the base.

Any signal? Obviously you're showing yet again your ignorance of real
radio, you
stinking little prick.

The actual term is "significant signal" and that means that such a station
should not be listenable more than a few hundred meters from a base. Use of
carrier current or very low power FM is the answer.

"significant signal" does not matter according to you.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Big 89 Rewind
 

In article ,
D Peter Maus wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
OK, here is one for you: How many people have the close of escrow papers
for homes they have not owned for 40 years? For most people, the house is
the biggest investment they would ever make, yet probably 99.9% of people
do not keep that kind of paperwork.
I do. I have all the records from every car I've ever owned.

That indicates why you think others would have similar papers. Most people,
the vast majority of them, don't.


M
Once a year has passed when I dispose of a car, I dispose of the papers.
That's beyond my limit of any liability, so good riddance. And I must have
had 35 to 40 cars over the years, too Houses, maybe two to three years.
And
I've had about 12 or 13 of those. And so on.
I even have my grandfather's from the house in River Forest.

You are, perchance, related to a family of pack rats?


Clever. You are, perchance, related to a family of traitors?

He certainly belongs to a family of pretenders.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Big 89 Rewind
 

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...

When nearly nobody in the 18-34 demo in the US listens to Rush or any
other
political talker, why would they listen when abroad?

Nice spin. People that call in to the program don't sound over 50. They
sound like they are 20 to 40 years old. Mom's with kids and many topics
revolve around kids, school.

The call screeners purposely exclude the dangerous blue-haired women and
senile old men, and purposely pick people in the youngest demos. They
know
that 9 out of 10 over 55 callers will want to talk about social security
and
Medicare, and they diligently keep these callers off the air. You don't
really think these shows let anyone at all on the air, do you?

Since they can fill the shows with 20 to 40 years old middle aged people
then they must be the a big proportion of the listeners. Most of the
commercials are aimed at the middle class, middle age group.

On the major talk shows except Dr. Laura, I seldom hear anyone who is not at
least in their mid to late 30's. Although about 60% of the average AM
news/talker is over 55, there still are enough in younger demos to fill up
the phone lines. As you apparently don't know, talk shows have a call
screener or, in some cases, several and often tens of lines. Their purpose
is to skew the demos younger, get most of the 55+ callers put in to "hold
hell" and to get calls that make the show interesting. 99% never get on the
air because of this. The host at all times has a computer screen showing
each call by content, age, sex, where calling from, etc. So they pick the
best one for each situation.

A syndicated talk show that cumes in the millions, or like Rush, tens of
millions, has no trouble in getting a few under-55 callers. And that is all
they need to make the show sound fresh... even if they represent a small
percentage of listeners.

Big 89 Rewind
 

"RHF" wrote in message
...

The US Congress 'granted' US Citizenship to the Residents
of Puerto Rico and the US Congress 'could' take it away.

they can not take away the right of citizenship as the pople alive today
have no prior citizenbship to revert to.

But - More importantly the peoples of the "Commonwealth"
of Puerto Rico can by simply Voting to be an Independent
Nation -and- Say Bye-Bye to US Citizenship [.]

Less than 2% of the votes in the last elections were for the independence
party. The rest were about half and half for continued commonwealth status
and for statehood parties.

Big 89 Rewind
 

"Telamon" wrote in message
...

"Youngest demos" for talk is generally 35-44.

I hear people in their twenties all the time. Many are servicemen or the
wives of serviceman.


Less than 3% of the average talk station's audience is under 35. In the case
of KGO, a recognized leader in talk, the percentage under 35 is 1%.

Big 89 Rewind
 

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
... The
pride with which Gleason asserts his part in getting two AFRTS
stations closed only underscores the assertion sometime back that the
only thing we've ever heard him renounce is his citizenship.


The driving force in closing AFRTS Ramey and AFRTS Buchanan was the
PRBA
which objected, on legal grounds, to those stations covering way too
much
of the civilian population when an LPFM would suffice. Considering
that,
at the time, the environmental damage and health risk the Navy was
putting the Municipality of Vieques through at the time, the PRBA was
rather adamant about this invasion of Puerto Rican airwaves by the US
military.





Once again, you demonstrate my point for me.

If the point is to show how many ugly things the US has done abroad, then
that's right.

That's pretty offensive Eduardo. Why don't you just head back to South
America. We don't need your kind in the USA.


What is offensive about saying what most well travelled and educated people
know... that the US is quickly losing its edge and competitiveness and
influence. Would you rather bury your head in the sand?

What the US needs to learn is that in this time of competition for
resources, most of the world hates US. Our interventionist policies, going
back to the Monroe Doctrine, have made the US widely hated. A change in
attitude is long called for.

Big 89 Rewind
 

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
... The
pride with which Gleason asserts his part in getting two AFRTS
stations closed only underscores the assertion sometime back that the
only thing we've ever heard him renounce is his citizenship.


The driving force in closing AFRTS Ramey and AFRTS Buchanan was the PRBA
which objected, on legal grounds, to those stations covering way too much
of the civilian population when an LPFM would suffice. Considering that,
at the time, the environmental damage and health risk the Navy was
putting the Municipality of Vieques through at the time, the PRBA was
rather adamant about this invasion of Puerto Rican airwaves by the US
military.





Once again, you demonstrate my point for me.

If the point is to show how many ugly things the US has done abroad, then
that's right.

That's pretty offensive Eduardo. Why don't you just head back to South
America. We don't need your kind in the USA.

They apparently didn't need his kind down there either.

Big 89 Rewind
 

m II wrote:

=============================================
935 Lies on the Way to a War

Now, now Mike...not lies, just "shading the truth". :-)

Big 89 Rewind
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
... The
pride with which Gleason asserts his part in getting two AFRTS
stations closed only underscores the assertion sometime back that the
only thing we've ever heard him renounce is his citizenship.


The driving force in closing AFRTS Ramey and AFRTS Buchanan was the PRBA
which objected, on legal grounds, to those stations covering way too much
of the civilian population when an LPFM would suffice. Considering that,
at the time, the environmental damage and health risk the Navy was
putting the Municipality of Vieques through at the time, the PRBA was
rather adamant about this invasion of Puerto Rican airwaves by the US
military.

I'm proud to have shelled the crap out of Vieques. I think we even hit a
wandering cow at one time. Hamburger!

Big 89 Rewind
 

dxAce wrote:

Dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Sure does contain a lot of news, and current events, Mr. Faux Hispanic!


Such as what?

Listen in and you might just find out. After you pull your head out of your ass,
of course.


I "listen in" regularly and all I hear is whining about how the mean old
populist democrats are making it so hard on poor little fat-cat
republicants.

Big 89 Rewind
 

On Jun 1, 10:31*am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...







David Eduardo wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message

Or maybe the troops just like Rush?

* Isn't it amazing that never occurs to programmers?

When nearly nobody in the 18-34 demo in the US listens to Rush or any
other
political talker, why would they listen when abroad?

Maybe they want the truth from home.

- From Limbaugh? That's an entertainment program,
not a news show.

d'Eduardo,

Rush Limbaugh presents 'The News with a Right
Thinking View Point" and Yes he is Entertaining.

~ RHF

Big 89 Rewind
 

dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

Pardon my mistake, here. That would be WEFM, not WMET. Currently
known as WUSN. And yes, they are, btw. Doing some research on Zenithm,
in February, I needed some information about their flagship station.
The engineer pulled all the information straight out of his files.

I helped preserve those files when working for General Cinema in 1978.
120 W. Madison. Very chilly.


You may wish, then, to remind David about your own experiences with
the maintenance of documentation files at Radio stations. He's of the
opinion that there are none that go back beyond a few years.

Big 89 Rewind
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
... The
pride with which Gleason asserts his part in getting two AFRTS
stations closed only underscores the assertion sometime back that the
only thing we've ever heard him renounce is his citizenship.


The driving force in closing AFRTS Ramey and AFRTS Buchanan was the
PRBA
which objected, on legal grounds, to those stations covering way too
much
of the civilian population when an LPFM would suffice. Considering
that,
at the time, the environmental damage and health risk the Navy was
putting the Municipality of Vieques through at the time, the PRBA was
rather adamant about this invasion of Puerto Rican airwaves by the US
military.

I'm proud to have shelled the crap out of Vieques. I think we even hit a
wandering cow at one time. Hamburger!


Misanthrope. Although the Navy promised to exit the Vieques bombing range
right after W.W. II, it kept on shelling the inhabited island for 50 years
more. The result was the highest cancer rate in Puerto Rico, the lack of
development of one of the Caribbean's prettiest islands and, thus, a source
of income for PR, and the creation of long-term resentment against the armed
forces for failing to keep their word... a common occurrence in PR.

Big 89 Rewind
 

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

Pardon my mistake, here. That would be WEFM, not WMET. Currently known
as WUSN. And yes, they are, btw. Doing some research on Zenithm, in
February, I needed some information about their flagship station. The
engineer pulled all the information straight out of his files.

I helped preserve those files when working for General Cinema in 1978.
120 W. Madison. Very chilly.


You may wish, then, to remind David about your own experiences with the
maintenance of documentation files at Radio stations. He's of the opinion
that there are none that go back beyond a few years.


I said that the remaining ones are few and far between. I have never seen a
single case, and I have direct, on site experience with well over 100
stations in the US.

Big 89 Rewind
 

David Eduardo wrote:

Misanthrope. Although the Navy promised to exit the Vieques bombing range
right after W.W. II, it kept on shelling the inhabited island for 50 years
more. The result was the highest cancer rate in Puerto Rico, the lack of
development of one of the Caribbean's prettiest islands and, thus, a source
of income for PR, and the creation of long-term resentment against the armed
forces for failing to keep their word... a common occurrence in PR.


Do you want him to show compassion or sorrow? It won't happen. Those are
traits of intelligence.

Steve Lare thinks Agent Orange and Zyklon B are funny.



mike


--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter
blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups.

http://improve-usenet.org/

Big 89 Rewind
 

dxAce wrote:

Any signal? Obviously you're showing yet again your ignorance of real radio, you
stinking little prick.

Get the hell out of my country, boy, and head back to where those who appreciate
little NAZI *******s such as yourself, you little faux Hispanic piece of ****.


Drunk again, eh Lare? That last sentence makes no sense whatsoever.
Horrible grammar. Never mind the irony of *you* calling someone else a
NAZI. Hilarious.

Are you still encouraging your Congressman and Government to open ALL
mail coming into the US?




mike

--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter
blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups.

http://improve-usenet.org/

Big 89 Rewind
 

m II wrote:

dxAce, AKA Steve Lare, wrote:

I'm proud to have shelled the crap out of Vieques. I think we even hit a
wandering cow at one time. Hamburger!


Have you been a homosexual since the US Navy experience?

Never been. After all, I'm not a dumbass Canuck.

Big 89 Rewind
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
... The
pride with which Gleason asserts his part in getting two AFRTS
stations closed only underscores the assertion sometime back that the
only thing we've ever heard him renounce is his citizenship.


The driving force in closing AFRTS Ramey and AFRTS Buchanan was the
PRBA
which objected, on legal grounds, to those stations covering way too
much
of the civilian population when an LPFM would suffice. Considering
that,
at the time, the environmental damage and health risk the Navy was
putting the Municipality of Vieques through at the time, the PRBA was
rather adamant about this invasion of Puerto Rican airwaves by the US
military.

I'm proud to have shelled the crap out of Vieques. I think we even hit a
wandering cow at one time. Hamburger!


Misanthrope. Although the Navy promised to exit the Vieques bombing range
right after W.W. II, it kept on shelling the inhabited island for 50 years
more. The result was the highest cancer rate in Puerto Rico, the lack of
development of one of the Caribbean's prettiest islands and, thus, a source
of income for PR, and the creation of long-term resentment against the armed
forces for failing to keep their word... a common occurrence in PR.

Gee, they never seem to want to be independent.

Wonder why?

$$$$

Big 89 Rewind
 

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

Pardon my mistake, here. That would be WEFM, not WMET. Currently known
as WUSN. And yes, they are, btw. Doing some research on Zenithm, in
February, I needed some information about their flagship station. The
engineer pulled all the information straight out of his files.
I helped preserve those files when working for General Cinema in 1978.
120 W. Madison. Very chilly.

You may wish, then, to remind David about your own experiences with the
maintenance of documentation files at Radio stations. He's of the opinion
that there are none that go back beyond a few years.


I said that the remaining ones are few and far between. I have never seen a
single case, and I have direct, on site experience with well over 100
stations in the US.




I'm sorry, David, but in an industry that thrives on documentation,
with as much government involvement, I simply don't beleive that all of
the stations I've been involved with, with all the documentation that's
been on hand, have been anomalous.

You, on the other hand, have no interest in documentation that goes
more than a few years deep. And, it's pretty obvious why you'd have a
vested interest in having such a short tail. I can see why you'd believe
that everyone else would, too.

Big 89 Rewind
 

David Eduardo wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

Pardon my mistake, here. That would be WEFM, not WMET. Currently known
as WUSN. And yes, they are, btw. Doing some research on Zenithm, in
February, I needed some information about their flagship station. The
engineer pulled all the information straight out of his files.

I helped preserve those files when working for General Cinema in 1978.
120 W. Madison. Very chilly.


You may wish, then, to remind David about your own experiences with the
maintenance of documentation files at Radio stations. He's of the opinion
that there are none that go back beyond a few years.


I said that the remaining ones are few and far between. I have never seen a
single case, and I have direct, on site experience with well over 100
stations in the US.

And you own not a single one. Just like Ecuador, it's deja vu all over again.

d'Eduardo : So in your Radio Marketing World Writing-Off Half (1/2) the US Population is Good Business.
 

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

No, the ages radio advertisers seek are 18 to 54. Nearly never do you see
teen buys nor do you see 55+ buys. Everything is in the 18-54 group.

That's great news Eduardo. That means we are all going to be rich since
none of us will be spending any money once we are over 54 years. No more
worries about retirement.


Major advertisers from Budweiser to P&G and Lever have proven in their
in-house research that there is no ROI on advertising to 55+ with mass
market products. It takes too many impressions to create a change in habits,
and the cost of those impressions exceeds the profit on the sale.

Big 89 Rewind
 

RHF wrote:
On Jun 1, 10:31 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...







David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
Or maybe the troops just like Rush?
Isn't it amazing that never occurs to programmers?
When nearly nobody in the 18-34 demo in the US listens to Rush or any
other
political talker, why would they listen when abroad?
Maybe they want the truth from home.
- From Limbaugh? That's an entertainment program,
not a news show.

d'Eduardo,

Rush Limbaugh presents 'The News with a Right
Thinking View Point" and Yes he is Entertaining.

~ RHF
.
OK, maybe you can give an example of real news on Limbaugh's show. All
I hear is whining.

Big 89 Rewind
 

D Peter Maus wrote:
dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

Pardon my mistake, here. That would be WEFM, not WMET. Currently
known as WUSN. And yes, they are, btw. Doing some research on
Zenithm, in February, I needed some information about their flagship
station. The engineer pulled all the information straight out of his
files.

I helped preserve those files when working for General Cinema in 1978.
120 W. Madison. Very chilly.


You may wish, then, to remind David about your own experiences with
the maintenance of documentation files at Radio stations. He's of the
opinion that there are none that go back beyond a few years.

WEFM was a special case. We had just finished going to the Supreme
Court and we were well aware that it was the pioneer FM stereo station.
Every place I've worked lately has a "compliance consultant" that
tells us what to save and what to discard; helps filing quarterlies;
maintains the Public File; etc.

Big 89 Rewind
 

clifto wrote:
Dave wrote:
I'd rather fight the enemy here, rather than over there.

You'd get more people to join you in surrender that way.


Bull****. We'd have the locals on our side and we'd have much shorter
supply lines.

Big 89 Rewind
 

Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

Pardon my mistake, here. That would be WEFM, not WMET. Currently
known as WUSN. And yes, they are, btw. Doing some research on
Zenithm, in February, I needed some information about their flagship
station. The engineer pulled all the information straight out of his
files.

I helped preserve those files when working for General Cinema in
1978. 120 W. Madison. Very chilly.


You may wish, then, to remind David about your own experiences with
the maintenance of documentation files at Radio stations. He's of the
opinion that there are none that go back beyond a few years.

WEFM was a special case. We had just finished going to the Supreme
Court and we were well aware that it was the pioneer FM stereo station.
Every place I've worked lately has a "compliance consultant" that tells
us what to save and what to discard; helps filing quarterlies; maintains
the Public File; etc.


Then, WDZ was a special case, I guess. And KWKH. And KFI. And KLZS.
And WEW. And...how many more do you need? Every place I've ever worked
has had documentation that went back decades. If not back to the beginning.

Big 89 Rewind
 

D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

Pardon my mistake, here. That would be WEFM, not WMET. Currently
known as WUSN. And yes, they are, btw. Doing some research on
Zenithm, in February, I needed some information about their
flagship station. The engineer pulled all the information straight
out of his files.

I helped preserve those files when working for General Cinema in
1978. 120 W. Madison. Very chilly.


You may wish, then, to remind David about your own experiences with
the maintenance of documentation files at Radio stations. He's of the
opinion that there are none that go back beyond a few years.

WEFM was a special case. We had just finished going to the Supreme
Court and we were well aware that it was the pioneer FM stereo
station. Every place I've worked lately has a "compliance consultant"
that tells us what to save and what to discard; helps filing
quarterlies; maintains the Public File; etc.


Then, WDZ was a special case, I guess. And KWKH. And KFI. And KLZS.
And WEW. And...how many more do you need? Every place I've ever worked
has had documentation that went back decades. If not back to the beginning.




****...correct that...not KFI, but KFH. (Too many nights covering
repairs, here. Sorry about that.) Hell we still has the WE transmitter
and tower in operation.

Big 89 Rewind
 

Dave wrote:
clifto wrote:
Dave wrote:
I'd rather fight the enemy here, rather than over there.

You'd get more people to join you in surrender that way.


Bull****. We'd have the locals on our side and we'd have much shorter
supply lines.

Face it, you'd love the fact that the terror over here would encourage
the weak to go over to your surrender side and vote to mollycoddle the
terrorists.

--
Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics
http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm

(OT) : The War on Islam-O-Facism is a 100~200 Year War for WesternCivilization to Endure, or be Subjugated by Islam {Convert-or-Die}.
 

On Jun 3, 10:40*am, clifto wrote:

Dave -wrote-
- - - - I'd rather fight the enemy here, rather than over there.

Clifto -wrote-
- - - You'd get more people to join you in surrender that way.

Dave -wrote-
- - Bull****. *
- - We'd have the locals on our side
- - and we'd have much shorter supply lines.

Clifto -wrote-
- Face it, you'd love the fact that the terror over here
- would encourage the weak to go over to your
- surrender side and vote to mollycoddle the terrorists.

"IF" - Big 'If' there is another major Terrorist Attack on
the USA by Islam-O-Facist : IMHO the vast majority of
US Citizens will not settle for less than Total War on
the sponsoring Governments.

Here-Is-Something-To-Think-About :
The War on Islam-O-Facism is a 100~200 Year War
for Western Civilization to Endure, or be Subjugated
by Islam {Convert-or-Die}.
[ Fight into the 22nd Century : Or Submit to the 7th Century ]

The Neutron Bomb is the Answer to Dealing with
Nations who's Governments sponsor Terrorism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_bomb

After the First Counter Strike :
They Will Have A Very Level Praying Field.
Plus the Infrastructure will still be in-place.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrastructure
Open-Up the newly Vacated Lands to Migration from
Non-Islamic Peoples and World Wide Investment.
China and India could both re-locate 3~5 Million of
their people a Year for the next 100 Years to help
Re-Poplulate formerly Islamic Nations. The rest of
the non-islamic world could do the same.

yes - i said that ~ RHF