Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Eduardo - Bloggers bash radio!
"gallant17" wrote in message ... "What you should typically expect through negotiation is half of the published rate." Like airlines, most radio stations have many rates, many of which are based on demand (often called grid rate cards). Rates are highly dynamic. "A Boston station that typically sold morning drive spots for $150 sold me a package deal for $10." You could probably find such deals on nearly every station, depending on the time of the day and the flexibility of the schedule. "Don't believe radio salespeople for a minute." There are sleazy sellers in any business. They are generally eliminated as the customers don't renew so they get canned. "They skip clients ads on a regular basis." Untrue. False billing (charging for unaired spots) is a cause for license revocation. With the computer software available today for scheduling and the instant feedback from digital broadcast stystems, it is really rare for a spot to be missed. Any public company that has to comply with recent legislation such as Sarbox is going to both self audit and have an outside audit and any discrepancy between actual broadcast and contracts is going to trigger a large scale investigation. "Broadcast is too expensive for most small or new businesses to consider." Absolutely true in many cases in all but smaller towns and markets. A single location business will generally only draw clientele from a few miles around... in a large city, much coverage is wasted as listeners or viewers or readers of metro papers are generally to far away to come to a specific single store unless it is unique in the market. Of course, they claimed blogging is the best marketing tool on earth. What about all of that bashing of HD Radio? I guess that they need to search on "hdradiofarce"! Ha! Ha! Eduardo! **** you! AM HD radio is not going to work because AM is too far gone and there are too few decent AM signals in the US. FM HD can work based on unique formats and new radios being developed. Note that the bashers generally have nothing to do with any stations involved in HD. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Eduardo - Bloggers bash radio!
On May 27, 6:43*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"gallant17" wrote in message ... "What you should typically expect through negotiation is half of the published rate." Like airlines, most radio stations have many rates, many of which are based on demand (often called grid rate cards). Rates are highly dynamic. "A Boston station that typically sold morning drive spots for $150 sold me a package deal for $10." You could probably find such deals on nearly every station, depending on the time of the day and the flexibility of the schedule. "Don't believe radio salespeople for a minute." There are sleazy sellers in any business. They are generally eliminated as the customers don't renew so they get canned. "They skip clients ads on a regular basis." Untrue. False billing (charging for unaired spots) is a cause for license revocation. With the computer software available today for scheduling and the instant feedback from digital broadcast stystems, it is really rare for a spot to be missed. Any public company that has to comply with recent legislation such as Sarbox is going to both self audit and have an outside audit and any discrepancy between actual broadcast and contracts is going to trigger a large scale investigation. "Broadcast is too expensive for most small or new businesses to consider." Absolutely true in many cases in all but smaller towns and markets. A single location business will generally only draw clientele from a few miles around... in a large city, much coverage is wasted as listeners or viewers or readers of metro papers are generally to far away to come to a specific single store unless it is unique in the market. Of course, they claimed blogging is the best marketing tool on earth. What about all of that bashing of HD Radio? I guess that they need to search on "hdradiofarce"! Ha! Ha! Eduardo! **** you! AM HD radio is not going to work because AM is too far gone and there are too few decent AM signals in the US. FM HD can work based on unique formats and new radios being developed. Note that the bashers generally have nothing to do with any stations involved in HD. "AM HD radio is not going to work because AM is too far gone and there are too few decent AM signals in the US. FM HD can work based on unique formats and new radios being developed. Note that the bashers generally have nothing to do with any stations involved in HD." "Editorial: AM IBOC in Distress?" "Citadel Director of Corporate Engineering Martin Stabbert embodied questions about the efficacy of full-time AM HD when he ordered all his AMs that had already converted to cease transmitting HD at night, using language that must have given Ibiquity officials heartburn. Separately and for different immediate reasons, Cox, in a “let’s wait and see” move, has tried HD on most of its AM stations but is taking it off the air day and night, once tested at each facility." http://www.rwonline.com/pages/s.0044/t.9917.html No, AM-HD is not going to work because of: "Citadel Halts AM Nighttime IBOC Operation Amid Complaints" "An excerpt from his memo to staff reads: In response to the lackluster performance, the limited benefit and various reports of significant interference, Citadel is suspending nighttime AM HD operations at this time. Please reinstate your previous procedures for daytime-only HD operation as soon as possible.” http://www.radioworld.com/pages/s.0121/t.8847.html FM-HD is also a problem: "HD Interference: Not Just For AM Anymore" "Radio World Engineering Extra dropped a bomb this month with a very provocative cover story: 'What Are We Doing to Ourselves, Exactly?' Written by Doug Vernier, the man who authored the technical specifications for an ongoing Corporation for Public Broadcasting- sponsored HD Radio interference analysis, the report is the first of its kind to document interference between FM-HD stations around the country. Using anecdotal reportage, some sophisticated contour- mapping, and presumably 'early data' from the CPB study, Vernier's article conclusively proves how stations running in hybrid HD/analog mode can (and do) interfere somewhat significantly with not only themselves, but their neighbors on the FM dial." http://diymedia.net/archive/1207.htm#122307 News/talk/sports on the 50kw AM stations is alive-and-well: WHO-AM News Talk Information 9.7 7.2 9.9 10.6 WLW-AM News Talk Information 8.9 9.9 11.2 9.8 WSB-AM News Talk Information 9.3 8.7 9.2 8.2 WGN-AM News Talk Information 5.3 5.5 5.8 5.4 WBBM-AM All News 4.2 4.1 4.4 4.6 WLS-AM News Talk Information 4.1 3.7 3.7 3.8 WTAM-AM News Talk Information 7.3 8.0 6.5 7.3 WJR-AM News Talk Information 4.8 4.9 5.3 5.3 KMOX-AM News Talk Information 8.4 7.7 8.2 8.4 KSL-AM News Talk Information 5.9 6.7 8.6 7.7 http://www.arbitron.com/radio_stations/home.htm It is the music-oriented FMs that are in trouble: "Sean Hannity's warning for music-oriented Radio" "In five years when every car has an iPod connection and you can listen to anything you want, what is music radio going to do? Sean is dead right on this point. Within five years we'll see diminishing ratings on sound-alike music-oriented FM's. And radio will enter a new age of non-music programming. Not necessarily talk. But not particularly music... The AM radio style of political talk is only one facet of what will fast become a burgeoning trend towards non-music." http://www.hear2.com/2007/12/sean-hannitys-w.html |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bash tests published | CB | |||
Bash | CB | |||
Bash test publishing | CB | |||
Bash tests published | CB | |||
The Honorable DICK BASH | Policy |