dxAce wrote:

Actually, I know quite a few homosexuals. They respect me. I respect them. The
ones I have a problem with, and frankly, they themselves have a problem with the
'shove it in your face' folks.

I interact on at least a weekly basis with them, and surprisingly enough, they
themselves utter the words 'damn faggots' with those who tend to step out of line.


Do you do the 'interacting' before or after you get drunk? It must be
very frequently, however. It kept you from getting married.



mike



--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter
blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups.

http://improve-usenet.org/

m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Actually, I know quite a few homosexuals. They respect me. I respect them. The
ones I have a problem with, and frankly, they themselves have a problem with the
'shove it in your face' folks.

I interact on at least a weekly basis with them, and surprisingly enough, they
themselves utter the words 'damn faggots' with those who tend to step out of line.

Do you do the 'interacting' before or after you get drunk? It must be
very frequently, however. It kept you from getting married.

I got lucky!

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...

m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Doesn't matter, oh faux one. Thing is, folks learned that they no
longer wanted
you around as you're a damn pedantic piece of crap.
I am really happy that you are finally recognizing your superiors.
How so?

You
will be much happier once you accept the stature of your station in
life.
My station is pretty damn good.

I doubt that a lot. You live off the dole.


For a man who endorses illegal immigrants sucking up the resources of a
nation into which they were never invited, you got a damned lot of nerve
commenting on a legal citizen's retirement.

I do not believe in illegal immigration, and believe there should be
controls as well as enforcement. However, those here with no criminal record
should have a path to residency, particularly if they have children born or
naturalized here.

As a citizen, I have a right to that opinion, and I have the right to
suspect that Steve Lare is somehow scamming the government and me, as a
taxpayer.

Your whacked out opinion sucks. People that have not crossed to border
legally have started their criminal career and should be deported. You
should be first one to go.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:

I do not believe in illegal immigration, and believe there should be
controls as well as enforcement. However, those here with no criminal
record should have a path to residency, particularly if they have
children born or naturalized here.


So, you believe in amnesty for illegal immigration. Thanks for clearing
that up.

I believe in a path to legal residence, not amnesty. Those with a criminal
record (criminal, not misdemeanors) should not be eligible. All others
should be considered, perhaps made to pay a fine and some costs, but if they
have family and children here, allowed to become a resident and, eventually,
a citizen.

In other words, pretty much the plan of the Democrats and that of
organizations such as the NCLR.

You should believe in honesty and being forthright and have a desire not
to live amongst criminals or cater to them.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


One thing is certain, oh faux one, YOU never graduated from ANY school!


What an obvious attempt to change the subject from your miserable
knowledge
of economics and investments.

Actually, I have a degree from the Seidman School of Business, Grand
Valley
State College, (now University) with a major in Investments and
Securities.

If you do not know how to calculate net present value, you must have slept
during the classes. And for which you have to show investments in the low 6
digits.

You on the other hand have a GED.

Which I used to spend several years on the Dean's list at ASU, a slightly
better known university and from which I was plucked by the most respected
headhunter in the broadcast business to rebuild a broadcast subsidiary for a
NYSE listed company which made me an officer and division VP.

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"RHF" wrote in message
...

So for some one like me born and raised in the San Francisco
Bay Area : KGO is KGO; and KCBS is KCBS; while Right Wing
KSFO is on the Left-Side of the Dial.

Only about 10% of the population even use those stations.

Less than 0.1% believe what you post.

You are the only one that believes in the crap you post.

It's really very simple. Ask anyone with access to ratings data to do a run
on 12+ cume share for a combo created out of the three mentioned AMs in SF.
They reach about 1 in ten persons, no more.

Your cume is like ZERO.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:

You should believe in honesty and being forthright and have a desire not
to live amongst criminals or cater to them.




Why do you think he stayed out of Washington?



mike


--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter
blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups.

http://improve-usenet.org/

m II wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

Perhaps we should send a packet of your postings to your corporate
headquarters for their evaluation.


Like the time Lare pretended to be from homeland security when he was
trying to get Mike fired from the university?

You are really disgusting.





Coming from you, I find THAT to be quite the compliment.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


One thing is certain, oh faux one, YOU never graduated from ANY school!


What an obvious attempt to change the subject from your miserable
knowledge
of economics and investments.

Actually, I have a degree from the Seidman School of Business, Grand
Valley
State College, (now University) with a major in Investments and
Securities.

If you do not know how to calculate net present value, you must have slept
during the classes.

What would indicate that I did not know how to do that?

And for which you have to show investments in the low 6
digits.

You on the other hand have a GED.

Which I used to spend several years on the Dean's list at ASU, a slightly
better known university and from which I was plucked by the most respected
headhunter in the broadcast business to rebuild a broadcast subsidiary for a
NYSE listed company which made me an officer and division VP.

Yet, you do not have a degree.

Good night, 'Eduardo'.

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Perhaps we should send a packet of your postings to your corporate
headquarters for their evaluation.

When you don't have a valid argument, you always resort to threats. You
have done this several times before.



And when you don't have a valid argument, you resort to evasion, change
of subject, semantics, and/or pedantry. You do this alot.

Actually, I do not do this. Your entire basis for this observation seems to
come from the fact that a study to determine cooperation for radio ratings
by a supplier somehow makes me comparable to a sanctuary city.


The fact is that I do not condone illegal immigration, but do believe in
a program to convert long term illegal residents into legal ones.


So, the ones who have been illegal the longest, should be rewarded with
citizenship?

Yep, if they have roots and kids and family here, that is the humanitarian
thing to do. More than that, until recently it would be considered the
American thing to do.

I also
believe that new regulations and enforcement should be put in place for
the future.


And what would you like to see embraced by those regulations and
enforcements.....

Tighter border control, a guest worker program, deportation of immigrant
criminals, etc.

And there we have change-of-suject. What's the matter, uncomfortable
admitting that Steve may actually have paid into the programs he claims?

Because of his attitude and definsiveness, I don't think he did.


I've been in this group as long as Steve Lare. Perhaps longer. What I've
not seen is him diverting attention by resorting to insults. He resorts to
insults in response to insults.

Tell that to the Canadians and other he routinely insults to divert
attention from a topic.

You can't claim the high ground in the insult game. You've been more
than insulting, not only to Steve, but to all of us, since your first
appearance. You can't cry foul when your argument is 'He hit me back
first."

My first appearance with anything controversian was to suggest that the
dying AM band should be allowed to try anything it could to save itself...
in this case, HD. Unfortunately, over the intervening years, AM listening is
even lower, and many whole nations are eliminating it.

As for Steve's homophobia....well, I'm reasonably certain that he's not
afraid of anything. Let along homosexuals. Not believing in their
lifestyle is not a phobia. Not liking them as individuals is not a phobia.

Making gay sexual insults does generally indicate an irrational or
self-masking phobia.