In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:


"Bart Bailey" wrote in message
...
In posted on Thu,
5 Jun 2008 14:24:32 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin

Most of SD county does not receive a listenable signal from KNX
based on what signal level is required to get ratings.

I get them just fine, maybe you're thinking of the Anza Borrego
desert communities

No, I am thinking of the fact, verified by dozens of ratings
periods in many, many markets that shows that AMs get over 95% of
their in home and at work listening (70% lof the total listening
on average is in home or at work where ZIPs are tracable) is in
areas where the signal is 10 mv/m or greater. Since only a tiny
amount of shoreline has that intensity from KNX, there is pretty
much nowhere that the signal is usable by the average,
non-hobbyist, listener. Which is part of why they have essentially
no in home or at work listening at all in SD County (the county is
the metro for Arbitron).

SNIP

You are so full of crap. You don't know what you are talking about
at all.

Yeah, you are right and the measured behaviour of millions of persons
over the period of a decade or more is wrong.

San Diego is one of the markets where listening location vs. signal
strength has been analyzed, going back to 1998 and covering 39 survey
periods and nearly 100,000 listener diaries.

You are full of it Eduardo. I don't care where you get your data from
it's either wrong, you have misinterpreted it or made incorrect
extrapolations. In any event you don't know up from down.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California