| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
June 14th 08, 07:00 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
(OT) SPECIAL: for Ace and other ditto heads
In article bDC4k.1296$L03.533@edtnps92, m II wrote:
Telamon wrote: Yeah, that was one whacked outcome. I haven't read the decision yet so I don't what the reasoning is but it sure must be torturous reading. Torturous? No. That's what they're trying to stop. Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the rights we posses? I don't think so. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
|
#2
June 14th 08, 07:28 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
(OT) SPECIAL: for Ace and other ditto heads
Telamon wrote:
Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the rights we posses? I don't think so. Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it. Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US convert to Napoleanic law? Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then denies the right of a trial. That is hell. Wake up. Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's replaced the Constitution. mike -- Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups. http://improve-usenet.org/ |
|
#3
June 14th 08, 07:44 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
(OT) SPECIAL: for Ace and other ditto heads
In article 8yJ4k.1364$L03.1142@edtnps92, m II wrote:
Telamon wrote: Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the rights we posses? I don't think so. Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it. Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US convert to Napoleanic law? Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then denies the right of a trial. That is hell. Wake up. Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's replaced the Constitution. You don't seem to understand the Constitution applies to US citizens not foreign military combatants. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
|
#4
June 14th 08, 07:54 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
(OT) SPECIAL: for Ace and other ditto heads
Telamon wrote:
Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's replaced the Constitution. You don't seem to understand the Constitution applies to US citizens not foreign military combatants. Some human beings are more equal than others in the eyes of God? mike -- Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups. http://improve-usenet.org/ |
|
#5
June 14th 08, 09:27 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
(OT) : Gitmo Prisoners are Un-Lawful Military Combatants[Islam-O-Facist Terrorists]
On Jun 13, 11:44*pm, Telamon
wrote: In article 8yJ4k.1364$L03.1142@edtnps92, m II wrote: Telamon wrote: Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the rights we posses? I don't think so. Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it. Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US convert to Napoleanic law? Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then denies the right of a trial. That is hell. Wake up. Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's replaced the Constitution. - You don't seem to understand the Constitution applies - to US citizens not foreign military combatants. - - -- - Telamon - Ventura, California Telamon - Ditto That ! Point-of-Fact - These 'people' down in Gitmo are Un-Lawful Military Combatants* : Who are Clearly Outside the Geneva Convention 1949. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlawfu...tary_combatant http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Convention * They are in-fact Islam-O-Facist Terrorists. GITMO - Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantan...detention_camp The Failure of the US Congress to Protect the USA and US Citizens from Terrorist Attacks by Islam-O-Facists. Don't Blame the US Military and the DOD. Don't Blame the US Justice Department Don't Blame the US Supreme Court and the Courts Don't Blame the US President and Administration Clearly the Blame Belongs to the US Congress* both Democrats and Republicans alike; and the US House of representatives and the USSenate alike. * The US Congress Makes the Laws * The US Congress Failed to Make Good Laws to deal effectively with these Un-Lawful Military Combatants who are Islam-O-Facist Terrorists. * The US Congress has Failing to Act : This Situation is the Fault of the US Congress. as an american citizen and a voter - yes i say that ~ RHF |
|
#6
June 14th 08, 01:16 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
(OT) : Gitmo Prisoners are Un-Lawful Military Combatants [Islam-O-FacistTerrorists]
RHF wrote:
On Jun 13, 11:44 pm, Telamon wrote: In article 8yJ4k.1364$L03.1142@edtnps92, m II wrote: Telamon wrote: Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the rights we posses? I don't think so. Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it. Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US convert to Napoleanic law? Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then denies the right of a trial. That is hell. Wake up. Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's replaced the Constitution. - You don't seem to understand the Constitution applies - to US citizens not foreign military combatants. - - -- - Telamon - Ventura, California Telamon - Ditto That ! Point-of-Fact - These 'people' down in Gitmo are Un-Lawful Military Combatants* : Who are Clearly Outside the Geneva Convention 1949. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlawfu...tary_combatant http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Convention * They are in-fact Islam-O-Facist Terrorists. Does that include those who had been wrongfully imprisoned? JB GITMO - Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantan...detention_camp The Failure of the US Congress to Protect the USA and US Citizens from Terrorist Attacks by Islam-O-Facists. Don't Blame the US Military and the DOD. Don't Blame the US Justice Department Don't Blame the US Supreme Court and the Courts Don't Blame the US President and Administration Clearly the Blame Belongs to the US Congress* both Democrats and Republicans alike; and the US House of representatives and the USSenate alike. * The US Congress Makes the Laws * The US Congress Failed to Make Good Laws to deal effectively with these Un-Lawful Military Combatants who are Islam-O-Facist Terrorists. * The US Congress has Failing to Act : This Situation is the Fault of the US Congress. as an american citizen and a voter - yes i say that ~ RHF . |
|
#7
June 14th 08, 10:59 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
(OT) : Oh Canada - Open Up Your Doors to Set the WrongfullyImprisoned Free - Give the GITMO Detainees a Home to Plan Their Next Jihad
On Jun 14, 5:16*am, John Barnard wrote:
RHF wrote: On Jun 13, 11:44 pm, Telamon wrote: In article 8yJ4k.1364$L03.1142@edtnps92, m II wrote: Telamon wrote: Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the rights we posses? I don't think so. Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it. Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US convert to Napoleanic law? Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then denies the right of a trial. That is hell. Wake up. Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's replaced the Constitution. - You don't seem to understand the Constitution applies - to US citizens not foreign military combatants. - - -- - Telamon - Ventura, California Telamon - Ditto That ! Point-of-Fact - These 'people' down in Gitmo are Un-Lawful Military Combatants* : Who are Clearly Outside the Geneva Convention 1949. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlawfu...tary_combatant http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Convention * They are in-fact Islam-O-Facist Terrorists. GITMO - Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantan...detention_camp The Failure of the US Congress to Protect the USA and US Citizens from Terrorist Attacks by Islam-O-Facists. Don't Blame the US Military and the DOD. Don't Blame the US Justice Department Don't Blame the US Supreme Court and the Courts Don't Blame the US President and Administration Clearly the Blame Belongs to the US Congress* both Democrats and Republicans alike; and the US House of representatives and the USSenate alike. * The US Congress Makes the Laws * The US Congress Failed to Make Good Laws to deal effectively with these Un-Lawful Military Combatants who are Islam-O-Facist Terrorists. * The US Congress has Failing to Act : This Situation is the Fault of the US Congress. as an american citizen and a voter - yes i say that ~ RHF *.- Hide quoted text - - Does that include those who had been wrongfully imprisoned? - - JB JB - Give us your Name and Address : We will send all the ones who 'claim' that they were 'wrongfully imprisoned" over to stay with you so that you can help them to get over their "wrongfully imprisonment". GITMO - Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantan...detention_camp Since the beginning of the current war in Afghanistan, * 775 detainees have been brought to Guantanamo, * Approximately 420 of which have been released without charge. * As of May 2008, approximately 270 detainees remain. * More than a Fifth (1/5) are Cleared for Release but may have to wait Months or Years because U.S. Officials are finding it increasingly difficult to persuade Countries to accept them, * According to Officials and Defense Lawyers. * Of the Roughly 355 still Incarcerated, * U.S. Officials said they intend to eventually put 60 to 80 on trial * and Free the Rest. OH CANADA - OPEN UP YOUR DOORS TO SET THE WRONGFULLY IMPRISONED FREE: GIVE THE GITMO DETAINEES A HOME TO PLAN THEIR NEXT JIHAD . [ Jihad -aka- Islam-O-Facist Act of Terrorism. ] Note - The US Pentagon claimed that 36 former Guantanamo Inmates were "Confirmed or Suspected of having returned to Terrorism". oh the silence - no name - no address - just so much liberal rhetoric from canada~ RHF |
|
#8
June 15th 08, 05:45 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
(OT) : Oh Canada - Open Up Your Doors to Set the WrongfullyImprisoned Free - Give the GITMO Detainees a Home to Plan Their Next Jihad
RHF wrote:
On Jun 14, 5:16 am, John Barnard wrote: RHF wrote: On Jun 13, 11:44 pm, Telamon wrote: In article 8yJ4k.1364$L03.1142@edtnps92, m II wrote: Telamon wrote: Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the rights we posses? I don't think so. Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it. Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US convert to Napoleanic law? Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then denies the right of a trial. That is hell. Wake up. Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's replaced the Constitution. - You don't seem to understand the Constitution applies - to US citizens not foreign military combatants. - - -- - Telamon - Ventura, California Telamon - Ditto That ! Point-of-Fact - These 'people' down in Gitmo are Un-Lawful Military Combatants* : Who are Clearly Outside the Geneva Convention 1949. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlawfu...tary_combatant http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Convention * They are in-fact Islam-O-Facist Terrorists. GITMO - Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantan...detention_camp The Failure of the US Congress to Protect the USA and US Citizens from Terrorist Attacks by Islam-O-Facists. Don't Blame the US Military and the DOD. Don't Blame the US Justice Department Don't Blame the US Supreme Court and the Courts Don't Blame the US President and Administration Clearly the Blame Belongs to the US Congress* both Democrats and Republicans alike; and the US House of representatives and the USSenate alike. * The US Congress Makes the Laws * The US Congress Failed to Make Good Laws to deal effectively with these Un-Lawful Military Combatants who are Islam-O-Facist Terrorists. * The US Congress has Failing to Act : This Situation is the Fault of the US Congress. as an american citizen and a voter - yes i say that ~ RHF .- Hide quoted text - - Does that include those who had been wrongfully imprisoned? - - JB JB - Give us your Name and Address : We will send all the ones who 'claim' that they were 'wrongfully imprisoned" over to stay with you so that you can help them to get over their "wrongfully imprisonment". GITMO - Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantan...detention_camp Since the beginning of the current war in Afghanistan, * 775 detainees have been brought to Guantanamo, * Approximately 420 of which have been released without charge. * As of May 2008, approximately 270 detainees remain. * More than a Fifth (1/5) are Cleared for Release but may have to wait Months or Years because U.S. Officials are finding it increasingly difficult to persuade Countries to accept them, * According to Officials and Defense Lawyers. * Of the Roughly 355 still Incarcerated, * U.S. Officials said they intend to eventually put 60 to 80 on trial * and Free the Rest. OH CANADA - OPEN UP YOUR DOORS TO SET THE WRONGFULLY IMPRISONED FREE: GIVE THE GITMO DETAINEES A HOME TO PLAN THEIR NEXT JIHAD . [ Jihad -aka- Islam-O-Facist Act of Terrorism. ] Note - The US Pentagon claimed that 36 former Guantanamo Inmates were "Confirmed or Suspected of having returned to Terrorism". oh the silence - no name - no address - just so much liberal rhetoric from canada~ RHF . Nature abhors a vacuum and your last name is Hoover. JB |
|
#9
June 15th 08, 10:23 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
(OT) : Gitmo Prisoners are Un-Lawful Military Combatants[Islam-O-Facist Terrorists]
On Jun 14, 5:16*am, John Barnard wrote:
RHF wrote: On Jun 13, 11:44 pm, Telamon wrote: In article 8yJ4k.1364$L03.1142@edtnps92, m II wrote: Telamon wrote: Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the rights we posses? I don't think so. Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it. Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US convert to Napoleanic law? Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then denies the right of a trial. That is hell. Wake up. Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's replaced the Constitution. - You don't seem to understand the Constitution applies - to US citizens not foreign military combatants. - - -- - Telamon - Ventura, California Telamon - Ditto That ! Point-of-Fact - These 'people' down in Gitmo are Un-Lawful Military Combatants* : Who are Clearly Outside the Geneva Convention 1949. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlawfu...tary_combatant http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Convention * They are in-fact Islam-O-Facist Terrorists. Does that include those who had been wrongfully imprisoned? JB GITMO - Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantan...detention_camp The Failure of the US Congress to Protect the USA and US Citizens from Terrorist Attacks by Islam-O-Facists. Don't Blame the US Military and the DOD. Don't Blame the US Justice Department Don't Blame the US Supreme Court and the Courts Don't Blame the US President and Administration Clearly the Blame Belongs to the US Congress* both Democrats and Republicans alike; and the US House of representatives and the USSenate alike. * The US Congress Makes the Laws * The US Congress Failed to Make Good Laws to deal effectively with these Un-Lawful Military Combatants who are Islam-O-Facist Terrorists. * The US Congress has Failing to Act : This Situation is the Fault of the US Congress. as an american citizen and a voter - yes i say that ~ RHF *.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - JB - It's a Package Deal ~ RHF -aka- The Gift That Just Keeps On Killing |
|
#10
June 14th 08, 01:12 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
(OT) SPECIAL: for Ace and other ditto heads
Telamon wrote:
In article 8yJ4k.1364$L03.1142@edtnps92, m II wrote: Telamon wrote: Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the rights we posses? I don't think so. Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it. Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US convert to Napoleanic law? Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then denies the right of a trial. That is hell. Wake up. Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's replaced the Constitution. You don't seem to understand the Constitution applies to US citizens not foreign military combatants. Moron! And what about those people who have been wrongfully imprisoned? You deserve to live in a police state! JB |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| heads up - on air test. | Shortwave | |||
| fcc heads | Policy | |||
| fcc heads | CB | |||
| Heads up-WGN 720 | Shortwave | |||
Hybrid Mode
