In article xHC4k.1297$L03.601@edtnps92, m II wrote:

Brody wrote:

LOL .. yet another bogus study 'proving' conservatives are stupid. You
liberals are so GULLIBLE.

Do you realize that this tatic was used by the Nazi to demonize
'undesirible' groups before destroying them?


So, you are now demonizing the 'liberals' before you eliminate them?

There is no need to demonize or eliminate them. The liberals Darwinistic
tendencies will take care of that.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article
,
RHF wrote:

On Jun 13, 3:40*pm, m II wrote:
Brody wrote:
LOL .. yet another bogus study 'proving' conservatives are stupid. You
liberals are so GULLIBLE.

Do you realize that this tatic was used by the Nazi to demonize
'undesirible' groups before destroying them?

- So, you are now demonizing the 'liberals'
- before you eliminate them?
-
- mike

Mike,

With All the Abortions -by- The Liberals :
They Are In-Fact "Self" Eliminating.

STOP THE ABORTION OF LIBERALCIDE !

Save a Baby Liberal from Being Killed -by- It's Parents.

SNIP

See how that works Mikey?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:

Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court
has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen
jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants
who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if
they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the
rights we posses? I don't think so.



Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it.
Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US convert
to Napoleanic law?
Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then denies the right of a trial.
That is hell. Wake up.

Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's
replaced the Constitution.


mike


--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter
blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups.

http://improve-usenet.org/

Telamon wrote:

See how that works Mikey?

I'm not sure. The changing of topic and overstuffed reply by RHF or the
timely 'snip'?


mike


--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter
blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups.

http://improve-usenet.org/

In article 8yJ4k.1364$L03.1142@edtnps92, m II wrote:

Telamon wrote:

Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court
has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen
jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants
who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if
they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the
rights we posses? I don't think so.



Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it.
Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US
convert to Napoleanic law? Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then
denies the right of a trial. That is hell. Wake up.

Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's
replaced the Constitution.

You don't seem to understand the Constitution applies to US citizens not
foreign military combatants.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article LBJ4k.1365$L03.275@edtnps92, m II wrote:

Telamon wrote:

See how that works Mikey?

I'm not sure. The changing of topic and overstuffed reply by RHF or the
timely 'snip'?

The example of abortion.

"There is no need to demonize or eliminate them. The liberals
Darwinistic tendencies will take care of that."

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:

Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's
replaced the Constitution.

You don't seem to understand the Constitution applies to US citizens not
foreign military combatants.


Some human beings are more equal than others in the eyes of God?

mike

--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter
blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups.

http://improve-usenet.org/

Telamon wrote:
In article LBJ4k.1365$L03.275@edtnps92, m II wrote:

Telamon wrote:

See how that works Mikey?
I'm not sure. The changing of topic and overstuffed reply by RHF or the
timely 'snip'?

The example of abortion.

"There is no need to demonize or eliminate them. The liberals
Darwinistic tendencies will take care of that."


Wait a minute. My response was meant to show a bit of the hypocrisy
going on.

One person starts 'demonizing' someone who he had just finished accusing
of 'demonizing'. He most likely didn't even realize he was doing it.

The word 'demonize' is wearing pretty thin with me right about now, what
with the exorcism of Ayn Rand's ghost and all. She didn't see the profit
in leaving.



mike



--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter
blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups.

http://improve-usenet.org/

On Jun 13, 11:28*pm, m II wrote:
Telamon wrote:
Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court
has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen
jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants
who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if
they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the
rights we posses? I don't think so.

Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it.
Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US convert
to Napoleanic law?
Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then denies the right of a trial.
That is hell. Wake up.

Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's
replaced the Constitution.

mike

--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter
blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups.

http://improve-usenet.org/

Mike,

Guess we will have to revert to Time Honored Tradition
of Battle-Field Justice in the Combat Zone per the
Geneva Convention 1949.
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/lawofwar/geneva03.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Convention

Any Combatant Found in the Area of Combat : Who is
an Un-Lawful Military Combatant will be Interrogated,
Summarily Judged and Executed within 72 Hours. -eod-
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dorf/20020123.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlawfu...tary_combatant

GITMO - Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantan...detention_camp

The Failure of the US Congress to Protect the USA and
US Citizens from Terrorist Attacks by Islam-O-Facists.

Don't Blame the US Military and the DOD.

Don't Blame the US Justice Department

Don't Blame the US Supreme Court and the Courts

Don't Blame the US President and Administration

Clearly the Blame Belongs to the US Congress*
both Democrats and Republicans; House and
Senate alike.
* The US Congress Makes the Laws; and Lack of Good
Laws; and Failing to Act ARE The US Congresses Fault.

as an american citizen - yes i say that ~ RHF

On Jun 13, 11:44*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article 8yJ4k.1364$L03.1142@edtnps92, m II wrote:
Telamon wrote:

Yes torturous, mental in exchange for the physical. The supreme court
has seen fit to torture us all in exchange for the lot that has befallen
jailed foreign terrorists who are not US citizens. Military combatants
who would kill you if they had the chance, would deny you your rights if
they had the chance, and have no standing in our courts should get the
rights we posses? I don't think so.

Who is denying rights? It's already happened. Washington did it.
Whatever became of innocent until proven guilty? When did the US
convert to Napoleanic law? Nowadays, the US assumes guilt and then
denies the right of a trial. That is hell. Wake up.

Look up Napoleanic Law. You might as well learn it, now that it's
replaced the Constitution.

- You don't seem to understand the Constitution applies
- to US citizens not foreign military combatants.
-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California

Telamon - Ditto That !

Point-of-Fact - These 'people' down in Gitmo are
Un-Lawful Military Combatants* : Who are Clearly
Outside the Geneva Convention 1949.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlawfu...tary_combatant
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Convention
* They are in-fact Islam-O-Facist Terrorists.

GITMO - Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantan...detention_camp

The Failure of the US Congress to Protect the USA and
US Citizens from Terrorist Attacks by Islam-O-Facists.

Don't Blame the US Military and the DOD.

Don't Blame the US Justice Department

Don't Blame the US Supreme Court and the Courts

Don't Blame the US President and Administration

Clearly the Blame Belongs to the US Congress*
both Democrats and Republicans alike; and the
US House of representatives and the USSenate alike.
* The US Congress Makes the Laws
* The US Congress Failed to Make Good Laws to deal
effectively with these Un-Lawful Military Combatants
who are Islam-O-Facist Terrorists.
* The US Congress has Failing to Act : This Situation
is the Fault of the US Congress.

as an american citizen and a voter - yes i say that ~ RHF