(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week?
This is Daddy Warbucks?


How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple
days ago? WTF is that about?


What are you complaining about...I thought the problem was only talk
radio.

Make up your mind, Buckwheat.

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:



Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week?
This is Daddy Warbucks?

That is ratings-driven infotainment. People can't take their eyes off
him. Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma.

The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio and
the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that distortion
creates.



Ah. So, only talk radio need be balanced. Got it.

Balance has nothing to do with it. Their goal is to stifle free speech.
Conservative speech that is. They can't succeed in the open market so they
need Congress to do it for them.

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

"Dave" wrote in message
...
D Peter Maus wrote:

Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This
is Daddy Warbucks?


How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple days
ago? WTF is that about?

How about the MSM editing out ALL of Obamas numerous gaffes?

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

dxAce wrote:

Dave wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:


Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week?
This is Daddy Warbucks?

That is ratings-driven infotainment. People can't take their eyes off
him. Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma.

The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio
and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that
distortion creates.

The problem is, for whatever reason, *Liberal* talk radio can't seem to find a
loyal enough listener base that would encourage advertisers, so therefore they
either fail, or on a limited number of outlets.

It would seem to me that advertisers don't really care what political persuasion
buyers of their product(s) are as long as their money is green.


Perhaps that's because the format is often on weaker stations with
****ty signals, vs. the righties being on flamethrowers. The
Progressive Talk format does better on key demos in a few markets, and
beats sports talk in quite a few more.

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

Dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Dave wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:


Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week?
This is Daddy Warbucks?

That is ratings-driven infotainment. People can't take their eyes off
him. Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma.

The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio
and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that
distortion creates.

The problem is, for whatever reason, *Liberal* talk radio can't seem to find a
loyal enough listener base that would encourage advertisers, so therefore they
either fail, or on a limited number of outlets.

It would seem to me that advertisers don't really care what political persuasion
buyers of their product(s) are as long as their money is green.


Perhaps that's because the format is often on weaker stations with
****ty signals, vs. the righties being on flamethrowers.

Read the above again, dumbass.

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:



Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week?
This is Daddy Warbucks?

That is ratings-driven infotainment. People can't take their eyes off
him. Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma.

The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio
and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that
distortion creates.



Ah. So, only talk radio need be balanced. Got it.

It is a finite resource and part of the commons. It should not be used
to the detriment of one part of the people while advancing the interests
of a much smaller part of society.

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

MNMikeW wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message
...
D Peter Maus wrote:
Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week? This
is Daddy Warbucks?

How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple days
ago? WTF is that about?

How about the MSM editing out ALL of Obamas numerous gaffes?


If they are doing that how do you know about them, whatever they are?

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:



Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week?
This is Daddy Warbucks?

That is ratings-driven infotainment. People can't take their eyes
off him. Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma.

The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio
and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that
distortion creates.



Ah. So, only talk radio need be balanced. Got it.

It is a finite resource and part of the commons. It should not be used
to the detriment of one part of the people while advancing the interests
of a much smaller part of society.



And who gets to determine that? You?

If there were no lister interest, there would be no commercial
support, so there would be no program.

Suggesting that much smaller part of society....ain't so small.

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

Dave wrote:
MNMikeW wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message
...
D Peter Maus wrote:
Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week?
This is Daddy Warbucks?

How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple
days ago? WTF is that about?

How about the MSM editing out ALL of Obamas numerous gaffes?

If they are doing that how do you know about them, whatever they are?



And so there you do it, again...accepting without challenge the
validity of sources on one side of an issue, while challenging the
validity of the sources on the other side.

It would seem the only difference between you and Limbaugh is that
people listen to Rush.

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:



Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this
week? This is Daddy Warbucks?

That is ratings-driven infotainment. People can't take their eyes
off him. Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma.

The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk
radio and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion
that distortion creates.



Ah. So, only talk radio need be balanced. Got it.

It is a finite resource and part of the commons. It should not be
used to the detriment of one part of the people while advancing the
interests of a much smaller part of society.



And who gets to determine that? You?

If there were no lister interest, there would be no commercial
support, so there would be no program.

Suggesting that much smaller part of society....ain't so small.

If you think that the Limbaugh/Hannity/Savage axis represents the
mainstream you are wrong. Bush enjoys the support of maybe 1 out of 4
Americans. The war is opposed by 2 out of 3. We are the mainstream;
the righties are the radicals.