(OT) : Dave - Take a 'look' in a Mirror.
 

Adibotic (or whatever they call it) oil? Some people say that oil is
created by Earth's Magma, something like that, and Earth will never run
out of oil.I don't know.I say make oil out of all of the politicians and
that will solve the energy problems.
cuhulin

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

Telamon wrote:
In article oKshk.23629$nD.2259@pd7urf1no, John Barnard
wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article DObhk.877$nu6.761@edtnps83, m II wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Dave wrote:

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:41:29 -0400, dxAce wrote:

Interesting that no one's talking about that pile of Saddam's
'fictional' yellowcake that ended up in Canada.
Yeah via D{e@o G@r(}a , that place that should not be mentioned.
A pile of ore is not a weapon. It is not a gathering threat.

http://www.dg.navy.mil/web/

http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...ego-garcia.htm
Really? What about the illness it caused in Iraq?

Ten thousand Gulf war vets dead. DU played a big role.
SNIP

The yellow cake is far worse so you had better get that HAZMAT suit on.

Yawn. Aren't you tired of fear-mongering yet? Yellow cake may be worse
but it is far more difficult to get let alone process. Go Team Fear!

Thanks for making my point on what is more dangerous.

It was easy to get. It was sitting in barrels or was dumped on the
ground.

Go team retard.

I'm sure that team retard welcomes your membership!

A few questions for you:
How do you know it was easy to get? Were you there to watch the
shipments come in? How much was there? Did it take days, weeks, months
or years for it to come in?

If you had 25 000 tons of yellowcake, you could isolate about 50 tons of
uranium metal. Uranium metal is 99.3% U-238 and U-235. From 50 tons you
could isolate 0.35 tons of U-235 (this equals 700 lbs). For a gun-type
fission weapon ("Little Boy" was a gun-type weapon), you need 110 lbs of
U-235. All of this assumes that you have 100% extraction efficiency.
But wait! You need to have extremely sophisticated facilities to
separate out U-235 from the other isotopes! So where were these
facilities to isolate the U-235???

Lay off the assumptions - it'll make you less of an idiot!

JB

(OT) : The Baracking-Up of Iraq
 

RHF wrote:
On Jul 22, 3:05 pm, John Barnard wrote:
RHF wrote:
On Jul 22, 5:58 am, Dave wrote:
Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Dave wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:41:29 -0400, dxAce wrote:
Interesting that no one's talking about that pile of Saddam's
'fictional' yellowcake that ended up in Canada.
Yeah via D{e@o G@r(}a , that place that should not be mentioned.
A pile of ore is not a weapon. It is not a gathering threat.
http://www.dg.navy.mil/web/
http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...ego-garcia.htm
Really? What about the illness it caused in Iraq?
- The illness caused when we left the stockpile unguarded
- and the locals dumped the powder out and reused the
- barrels for drinking water? Tragic.
Dave so we are responsible for the Problems
cause by Saddam Hussein's Government ?
tragically you are wrong on this one too ~ RHF
.

- Don't you often say that you "broke" Iraq and
- now must fix it? You broke it, you buy it
- including all the problems with it.
-
- JB

JB - Saddam Hussein's Government's Mess is the
'responsibility' of the new Iraqi Government.

We 'fixed' it allright by sending the Yellow Cake
to Canada : Thus We Un-Broke-It !

I am sure that US President Barack Hussein Obama II
will Barack-Us-Out of Iraq PDQ

(OT) : The Baracking-Up of Iraq

Michelle LVR Obama -says- Let Them Eat Yellow Cake !
.

Are you sure that your name isn't McCain II? You seem to be mixing up
many things!

JB

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

Telamon wrote:
In article lHshk.88743$kx.1730@pd7urf3no, John Barnard
wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Dave wrote:

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:41:29 -0400, dxAce wrote:

Interesting that no one's talking about that pile of Saddam's
'fictional' yellowcake that ended up in Canada.
Yeah via D{e@o G@r(}a , that place that should not be mentioned.
A pile of ore is not a weapon. It is not a gathering threat.

http://www.dg.navy.mil/web/

http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...ego-garcia.htm
Really? What about the illness it caused in Iraq?

No metal,

Now, now, it is the DU weapons used by the US military in Iraq which
caused the illnesses.

Wrong.

Yes, yes, we know you are wrong. But that is the first step to admitting
that you have a big problem.

JB

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

Dave wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:45:52 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:


No, actually, you were talking about nothing of the kind. You were on
your usual rant.

And that's all it is. A rant.

I notice you've not once commented on anything Randi Rhodes has said.
Never called Tom Daschle or Harry Reid a liar.

You just make the same lock step noise about corporate evil, right
wing fascism, and the end of the Republic.

To borrow a signature from a member of another newsgroup I frequent:

You are like an uninvited guest at a picnic, who insists the potato
salad may have gone bad.

You seem to hang with a lot of grouchy people.

Randi Rhodes isn't trying to destroy the middle class, so she doesn't
bother me so much. A corporation cannot be evil; that is a personal
attribute. Corporations do what politicians and courts allow them to
do. People elect politicians to represent their best interests. The
news media is supposed to also represent the people, and keep the
politicians under close scrutiny. This is a basic tenet of Jeffersonian
Democracy. As that function has broken down, the Republic is doomed.
The media are nothing but cheerleaders for Daddy Warbucks,


Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week?
This is Daddy Warbucks?

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

On Jul 24, 11:19*pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:45:52 +0000, D Peter Maus wrote:

* *No, actually, you were talking about nothing of the kind. You were on
your usual rant.

* *And that's all it is. A rant.

* *I notice you've not once commented on anything Randi Rhodes has said.
Never called Tom Daschle or Harry Reid a liar.

* *You just make the same lock step noise about corporate evil, right
wing fascism, and the end of the Republic.

* *To borrow a signature from a member of another newsgroup I frequent:

* *You are like an uninvited guest at a picnic, who insists the potato
salad may have gone bad.

You seem to hang with a lot of grouchy people.

Randi Rhodes isn't trying to destroy the middle class, so she doesn't
bother me so much. *A corporation cannot be evil; *that is a personal
attribute. *Corporations do what politicians and courts allow them to
do. *People elect politicians to represent their best interests. *The
news media is supposed to also represent the people, *and keep the
politicians under close scrutiny. *This is a basic tenet of Jeffersonian
Democracy. *As that function has broken down, the Republic is doomed. *
The media are nothing but cheerleaders for Daddy Warbucks,

-*Have you been paying attention to the coverage
- of Obama this week?
- This is Daddy Warbucks?

Now that Obama Says It . . . It Must Be So !
[ The World According to Barack Hussein Obama II ]

The Faithful Follow the Great Citizen of the World ~ RHF

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

RHF wrote:

Now that Obama Says It . . . It Must Be So !
[ The World According to Barack Hussein Obama II ]

The Faithful Follow the Great Citizen of the World ~ RHF


I thought you wanted us to be #1 in something besides killing.

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

D Peter Maus wrote:

Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week?
This is Daddy Warbucks?


How about CBS editing out major McCain foreign policy gaffe a couple
days ago? WTF is that about?

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

Dave wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:



Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week?
This is Daddy Warbucks?

That is ratings-driven infotainment. People can't take their eyes off
him. Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma.

The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio
and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that
distortion creates.

The problem is, for whatever reason, *Liberal* talk radio can't seem to find a
loyal enough listener base that would encourage advertisers, so therefore they
either fail, or on a limited number of outlets.

It would seem to me that advertisers don't really care what political persuasion
buyers of their product(s) are as long as their money is green.

(OT) : Energy for a Strong America and a Healthy US Economy
 

Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:



Have you been paying attention to the coverage of Obama this week?
This is Daddy Warbucks?

That is ratings-driven infotainment. People can't take their eyes off
him. Let's face it, Mr. McCain doesn't really ooze charisma.

The subject however is the lack of diverse opinions on the talk radio
and the distorted impression of what is mainstream opinion that
distortion creates.



Ah. So, only talk radio need be balanced. Got it.