Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

"Billy Burpelson" wrote in message
...

Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.

The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly impolitic
statement to be made by a sitting president.

John Barnard wrote:

Here are some more impolitic quotes from the shrubbery:

"Goodbye from the world's biggest polluter" G8 summit in Tokyo, Japan

"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never
stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and
neither do we." Washington, D.C.; August 5, 2004

"Do you have blacks, too?" To Brazilian President, Henrique Cardoso;
Washington, D.C.; November 8, 2001

"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over
and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the
propaganda." Greece, New York; May 24, 2005

"I was going to say he's a piece of work, but that might not translate
too well. Is that all right, if I call you a 'piece of work'?" To
Jean-Claude Juncker, Prime Minister of Luxembourg; Washington, D.C.; June
20, 2005

"As you can possibly see, I have an injury myself - not even here at the
hospital, but in combat with a cedar. I eventually won. The cedar gave me
a little scratch." After visiting with wounded veterans from the Amputee
Care Center of Brooke Army Medical Center; San Antonio, Texas; January 1,
2006

JB

Please John, cut the man some slack. After all that alcohol and cocaine
abuse, it's a wonder he's as coherent as he is.

Why do you think that DxDouche and him have the same mindset. After all,
they do think very much the same

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.

The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly impolitic
statement to be made by a sitting president.

John Barnard wrote:

Here are some more impolitic quotes from the shrubbery:

"Goodbye from the world's biggest polluter" G8 summit in Tokyo, Japan

"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never
stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and
neither do we." Washington, D.C.; August 5, 2004

"Do you have blacks, too?" To Brazilian President, Henrique Cardoso;
Washington, D.C.; November 8, 2001

"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and
over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the
propaganda." Greece, New York; May 24, 2005

"I was going to say he's a piece of work, but that might not translate
too well. Is that all right, if I call you a 'piece of work'?" To
Jean-Claude Juncker, Prime Minister of Luxembourg; Washington, D.C.;
June 20, 2005

"As you can possibly see, I have an injury myself - not even here at
the hospital, but in combat with a cedar. I eventually won. The cedar
gave me a little scratch." After visiting with wounded veterans from
the Amputee Care Center of Brooke Army Medical Center; San Antonio,
Texas; January 1, 2006

JB

Please John, cut the man some slack. After all that alcohol and cocaine
abuse, it's a wonder he's as coherent as he is.

LOL! If I try and cut him some slack, Bob Dobbs would get upset ;). I
can't knock the entertainment value of many of GWB's quotes but that
last quote supersedes the bounds of anything that approaches tasteful.

JB

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:


Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references
please. The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly
impolitic statement to be made by a sitting president.

D Peter Maus wrote:

No more so than the taking of the Lord's name in vain by a devout
Christian.

First, over the last 7 1/2 years of his administration, numerous news
sources have had numerous news articles about W's profanity laced
tirades and outbursts. Are you contending all of those news stories are
fake?

Finally, it's interesting that you think a "devout Christian" would not
use vulgarity while apparently it does not bother or concern you that
this "devout Christian" lied us into a bogus war* that has taken
thousands of innocent lives.

* Please review the blue-ribbon, BI-PARTISAN Congressional panel that
has stated the same.

D Peter Maus wrote:

LOL!

Yup, DP, "LOL". Yer a real riot, a laugh a minute...

I'm sure the parents of the 4100 dead American kids and the relatives of
the tens of thousands innocent dead Iraqis share in your laughter at the
unprovoked, bogus 'war'.

Billy, Saddam started the war. We along with others are merely finishing what he
started.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

dxAce wrote:

I'm sure the parents of the 4100 dead American kids and the relatives of
the tens of thousands innocent dead Iraqis share in your laughter at the
unprovoked, bogus 'war'.

Billy, Saddam started the war. We along with others are merely finishing what he
started.


That's a new one. Please provide a shred of evidence supporting this
crazy notion.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:

I'm sure the parents of the 4100 dead American kids and the relatives of
the tens of thousands innocent dead Iraqis share in your laughter at the
unprovoked, bogus 'war'.

Billy, Saddam started the war. We along with others are merely finishing what he
started.


That's a new one.

New? Guess you weren't around when Saddam invaded Kuwait or for Gulf War I...

Were you locked up, out of touch, or just so damn stoned that you can't remember, oh
addled one?

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references
please. The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly
impolitic statement to be made by a sitting president.
D Peter Maus wrote:

No more so than the taking of the Lord's name in vain by a devout
Christian.
First, over the last 7 1/2 years of his administration, numerous news
sources have had numerous news articles about W's profanity laced
tirades and outbursts. Are you contending all of those news stories are
fake?

Finally, it's interesting that you think a "devout Christian" would not
use vulgarity while apparently it does not bother or concern you that
this "devout Christian" lied us into a bogus war* that has taken
thousands of innocent lives.

* Please review the blue-ribbon, BI-PARTISAN Congressional panel that
has stated the same.
D Peter Maus wrote:

LOL!
Yup, DP, "LOL". Yer a real riot, a laugh a minute...

I'm sure the parents of the 4100 dead American kids and the relatives of
the tens of thousands innocent dead Iraqis share in your laughter at the
unprovoked, bogus 'war'.

dxAce wrote:

Billy, Saddam started the war. We along with others are merely finishing what he
started.


I really do hate to say it, but...

Huh???

"Saddam started the war" [Gulf war II]?

Even Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney specifically stated that was -not- the case.

Please contact Washington immediately with this new information you have.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters AgainFollowup....
 

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Dave wrote:

Why no official denial?
D Peter Maus wrote:

For the same reasons there's never an official denial.
And that reason would be??? Please, do tell the rest of the story.

We're still waiting to hear the official government explanation of why
Guckert/Gannon (the male prostitute) had free reign at the White House.

As usual Billy you are clueless.

Maybe yes, maybe no...but as usual, *you* are -again- dodging, dancing,
spinning and refusing to answer a simple, direct, point-blank question
about -your- statement.

Why do you refuse to defend/explain it?

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references
please. The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly
impolitic statement to be made by a sitting president.
D Peter Maus wrote:

No more so than the taking of the Lord's name in vain by a devout
Christian.
First, over the last 7 1/2 years of his administration, numerous news
sources have had numerous news articles about W's profanity laced
tirades and outbursts. Are you contending all of those news stories are
fake?
SNIP

Where do you get this stuff? In the tabloids?

I have never heard of this on domestic radio, SW, or numerous news
sources on the Internet.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/bushcuss.asp

So what Mr. Drug addled.

"So what"?

*You* asked a specific question and he responded with a specific answer
(and a reference), that's "so what". What didn't you understand? It
seems straightforward enough.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Billy Burpelson wrote:


Billy Burpelson wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references
please. The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly
impolitic statement to be made by a sitting president.
D Peter Maus wrote:

No more so than the taking of the Lord's name in vain by a devout
Christian.
First, over the last 7 1/2 years of his administration, numerous news
sources have had numerous news articles about W's profanity laced
tirades and outbursts. Are you contending all of those news stories are
fake?

Finally, it's interesting that you think a "devout Christian" would not
use vulgarity while apparently it does not bother or concern you that
this "devout Christian" lied us into a bogus war* that has taken
thousands of innocent lives.

* Please review the blue-ribbon, BI-PARTISAN Congressional panel that
has stated the same.
D Peter Maus wrote:

LOL!
Yup, DP, "LOL". Yer a real riot, a laugh a minute...

I'm sure the parents of the 4100 dead American kids and the relatives of
the tens of thousands innocent dead Iraqis share in your laughter at the
unprovoked, bogus 'war'.

dxAce wrote:

Billy, Saddam started the war. We along with others are merely finishing what he
started.

I really do hate to say it, but...

Huh???

"Saddam started the war" [Gulf war II]?

Even Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney specifically stated that was -not- the case.

Please contact Washington immediately with this new information you have.

Billy, I suggest you contact those who are trying to help you with your mental health
problems, immediately.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again Followup....
 

On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:42:44 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.


This has been debunked.

It has not been debunked. It comes from a credible reporter with
solid inside connections. He works at a reputable organization who
would withdraw it if it had been "debunked".

Then where is the specific reference? There is none.

Name the reporter. Name the organization. I've been hearing this
statement for a number of years, now, but never where it actually came
from. I've not found any specific cite, reference, attribution, or even
quotation.

The only thing I've found is an article by Doug Thompson, in which he
claims that he's spoken with people who were in the room when this was
supposed to have been said.

Trouble is, that the number of persons he spoke to that day has become
variable: Two, then three, then two, then possibly four....

But no one else has reported it, except a few articles referring to
Thompson. And there are no direct attributions. What he's not done is
quoted anyone. This becomes, then, hearsay. And by its own content,
questionable.

Snopes.com had debunked this, and had an article posted on the site I
remember reading as late as two months ago. Looking for it this
morning, I found no reference to it at all. No surprise there.
Politically speaking, Snopes has been inconsistent in its objectivity at
best.

As it stands, it's a gratuitous assertion. A gratuitous assertion
that's been debunked. Also by those with solid inside connections.

As for retractions....well, I'll counter that with the name of Dan
Rather, who, when faced with hard evidence that his anti-Bush documents
were fakes, apologized, but insisted that the content of the faked
documents was true.




Capitol Hill Blue is the website for which Doug Thompson writes. A
reasonably credible news site at one time, until the owner of the site
admitted that his most used and most credible source Terrence J.
Wilkinson was a fake.

Google CapitolHillBlue+ Terrence J. Wilkinson to see for yourself.


The story has been debunked.



Well, regardless of what Cheny said or did not say, the Bush
administration's actions are often at odds with the U.S. constitution,
the Geneva agreements against torture, and international law in
general.

Seven months and counting...

bob
k5qwg