Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.

The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly impolitic
statement to be made by a sitting president.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

m II wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.

The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly impolitic
statement to be made by a sitting president.

==========================================
"Stop throwing the Constitution in my face," Bush screamed back. "It's
just a goddamned piece of paper!"

http://www.gnn.tv/threads/10799/Bush...e ce_of_paper
==========================================

Lots mo

http://tinyurl.com/5pqwtt

Perhaps what he was trying to indicate was that we cannot allow our enemies (such as dumbass
Canucks) to use OUR Constitution to destroy OUR country via internal means.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.


This has been debunked.


The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly impolitic
statement to be made by a sitting president.


No more so than the taking of the Lord's name in vain by a devout
Christian.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

dxAce wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/5pqwtt

Perhaps what he was trying to indicate was that we cannot allow our enemies (such as dumbass
Canucks) to use OUR Constitution to destroy OUR country via internal means.


=======================================

Actually Bush did say this. I used to use it as my signature whenever I
wrote something. I believe even Keith Olberman did a story on his show
at the time it came out.
Bush is not quite the perfect little church goer that he's suckered half
the country into believing he is. Here's another Bush person quote:
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said "The Constitution is an outdated
document, and needs a rewriting."
Here's the Olberman Piece:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wmc60JmaLbE


http://tinyurl.com/5se6r2
==============================================


mike





--
Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter
blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups.

http://improve-usenet.org/

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/5pqwtt

Perhaps what he was trying to indicate was that we cannot allow our enemies (such as dumbass
Canucks) to use OUR Constitution to destroy OUR country via internal means.

=======================================

Actually Bush did say this. I used to use it as my signature whenever I
wrote something.

Well good for you. But, since you're nothing more than a dumbass Canuck, I can't take to much
stock in what you say or do.

You are worthless.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

dxAce wrote:

m II wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.

The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly impolitic
statement to be made by a sitting president.
==========================================
"Stop throwing the Constitution in my face," Bush screamed back. "It's
just a goddamned piece of paper!"

http://www.gnn.tv/threads/10799/Bush...e ce_of_paper
==========================================

Lots mo

http://tinyurl.com/5pqwtt

Perhaps what he was trying to indicate was that we cannot allow our enemies (such as dumbass
Canucks) to use OUR Constitution to destroy OUR country via internal means.


That makes no sense. There is nothing to protect if we lose the
Constitution. Bin Laden wants Bush to destroy the country for him.
Bush has done everything Bin Laden wants.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

D Peter Maus wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.


This has been debunked.

It has not been debunked. It comes from a credible reporter with solid
inside connections. He works at a reputable organization who would
withdraw it if it had been "debunked".

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:

m II wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.

The reason I ask is, if true, it seems an astoundingly impolitic
statement to be made by a sitting president.
==========================================
"Stop throwing the Constitution in my face," Bush screamed back. "It's
just a goddamned piece of paper!"

http://www.gnn.tv/threads/10799/Bush...e ce_of_paper
==========================================

Lots mo

http://tinyurl.com/5pqwtt

Perhaps what he was trying to indicate was that we cannot allow our enemies (such as dumbass
Canucks) to use OUR Constitution to destroy OUR country via internal means.


That makes no sense. There is nothing to protect if we lose the
Constitution. Bin Laden wants Bush to destroy the country for him.
Bush has done everything Bin Laden wants.

Really? Has he chopped off your worthless head yet?

I know, I know, you've already lost your mind, so why worry about the head, right?

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters Again
 

Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.


This has been debunked.

It has not been debunked. It comes from a credible reporter with solid
inside connections. He works at a reputable organization who would
withdraw it if it had been "debunked".

Then where is the specific reference? There is none.

Name the reporter. Name the organization. I've been hearing this
statement for a number of years, now, but never where it actually came
from. I've not found any specific cite, reference, attribution, or even
quotation.

The only thing I've found is an article by Doug Thompson, in which he
claims that he's spoken with people who were in the room when this was
supposed to have been said.

Trouble is, that the number of persons he spoke to that day has
become variable: Two, then three, then two, then possibly four....

But no one else has reported it, except a few articles referring to
Thompson. And there are no direct attributions. What he's not done is
quoted anyone. This becomes, then, hearsay. And by its own content,
questionable.

Snopes.com had debunked this, and had an article posted on the site I
remember reading as late as two months ago. Looking for it this
morning, I found no reference to it at all. No surprise there.
Politically speaking, Snopes has been inconsistent in its objectivity at
best.

As it stands, it's a gratuitous assertion. A gratuitous assertion
that's been debunked. Also by those with solid inside connections.

As for retractions....well, I'll counter that with the name of Dan
Rather, who, when faced with hard evidence that his anti-Bush documents
were fakes, apologized, but insisted that the content of the faked
documents was true.

Bush/Congress Genuflect and Obey Their Corporate Masters AgainFollowup....
 

D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:
Tex wrote:

Why let a "god damn piece of paper" like the U.S. Constitution...

Was this actually said by Bush? Direct quote? If so, references please.


This has been debunked.

It has not been debunked. It comes from a credible reporter with
solid inside connections. He works at a reputable organization who
would withdraw it if it had been "debunked".

Then where is the specific reference? There is none.

Name the reporter. Name the organization. I've been hearing this
statement for a number of years, now, but never where it actually came
from. I've not found any specific cite, reference, attribution, or even
quotation.

The only thing I've found is an article by Doug Thompson, in which he
claims that he's spoken with people who were in the room when this was
supposed to have been said.

Trouble is, that the number of persons he spoke to that day has become
variable: Two, then three, then two, then possibly four....

But no one else has reported it, except a few articles referring to
Thompson. And there are no direct attributions. What he's not done is
quoted anyone. This becomes, then, hearsay. And by its own content,
questionable.

Snopes.com had debunked this, and had an article posted on the site I
remember reading as late as two months ago. Looking for it this
morning, I found no reference to it at all. No surprise there.
Politically speaking, Snopes has been inconsistent in its objectivity at
best.

As it stands, it's a gratuitous assertion. A gratuitous assertion
that's been debunked. Also by those with solid inside connections.

As for retractions....well, I'll counter that with the name of Dan
Rather, who, when faced with hard evidence that his anti-Bush documents
were fakes, apologized, but insisted that the content of the faked
documents was true.




Capitol Hill Blue is the website for which Doug Thompson writes. A
reasonably credible news site at one time, until the owner of the site
admitted that his most used and most credible source Terrence J.
Wilkinson was a fake.

Google CapitolHillBlue+ Terrence J. Wilkinson to see for yourself.


The story has been debunked.