Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 29th 08, 03:59 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 157
Default Ibiquitys Struble wants to debate but not open to the public.

Robert Struble has opened up a new Web Column to debate HD radio but
in an email conversation with him he refuses to open up the debate
comments to the public.

He continues to distort the facts concerning the lack of success of
Hybrid Digital and in no way wants to open up a public discourse on
the subject. I suggest anyone with interest read his message at
www.ibiquity.com/about_us/message

He just got another infusion of $40,000,000 of your dollars from the
Federal Government for his failed technology.
  #2   Report Post  
Old July 29th 08, 07:40 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 156
Default Ibiquitys Struble wants to debate but not open to the public.


"Rfburns" wrote in message
...
Robert Struble has opened up a new Web Column to debate HD radio but
in an email conversation with him he refuses to open up the debate
comments to the public.

He continues to distort the facts concerning the lack of success of
Hybrid Digital and in no way wants to open up a public discourse on
the subject. I suggest anyone with interest read his message at
www.ibiquity.com/about_us/message

He just got another infusion of $40,000,000 of your dollars from the
Federal Government for his failed technology.



According to Bob Struble, receiver manufacturers didn't think there were any
HD radio stations broadcasting a couple of years ago and there were no FM
radio recievers available in 1963.

Well, that's it. Progress is held back by receiver manufacturers who won't
sell fancy new radios!!

Bob Struble is such a hoot.

Frank Dresser




  #3   Report Post  
Old July 30th 08, 04:25 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 227
Default Ibiquitys Struble wants to debate but not open to the public.

On Jul 29, 2:40�pm, "Frank Dresser"
wrote:
"Rfburns" wrote in message

...

Robert Struble has opened up a new Web Column to debate HD radio but
in an email conversation with him he refuses to open up the debate
comments to the public.


He continues to distort the facts concerning the lack of success of
Hybrid Digital and in no way wants to open up a public discourse on
the subject. � I suggest anyone with interest read his message at
www.ibiquity.com/about_us/message


He just got another infusion of $40,000,000 of your dollars from the
Federal Government for his failed technology.


According to Bob Struble, receiver manufacturers didn't think there were any
HD radio stations broadcasting a couple of years ago and there were no FM
radio recievers available in 1963.

Well, that's it. �Progress is held back by receiver manufacturers who won't
sell fancy new radios!!

Bob Struble is such a hoot.

Frank Dresser


Yea, his blog is nothing but lies. I have been getting threats from
one of his co-horts on Orbitcast about my blog, with threats of
lawsuits, for posting just references to newspaper articles and other
peoples' blogs. I never give personal opinions, or allow comments, or
post copyright material. These scammers are running scared - I've
gotten visitors from the DOJ, US Courts, Congressional Quarterly, FCC,
GAO, GSA, US House of Reps., etc... I have a feeling that the
investigation into the HD Radio farce, with NPR bilking Congress out
of tens-of-millions, is on the horizon. Struble tries to compare
today's media lanscape with iPods, iPhones, Internet, etc., to that of
the 1970's.
  #4   Report Post  
Old July 30th 08, 05:33 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 157
Default Ibiquitys Struble wants to debate but not open to the public.

On Jul 29, 11:25 pm, wrote:
On Jul 29, 2:40 pm, "Frank Dresser"
wrote:



"Rfburns" wrote in message


...


Robert Struble has opened up a new Web Column to debate HD radio but
in an email conversation with him he refuses to open up the debate
comments to the public.


He continues to distort the facts concerning the lack of success of
Hybrid Digital and in no way wants to open up a public discourse on
the subject. I suggest anyone with interest read his message at
www.ibiquity.com/about_us/message


He just got another infusion of $40,000,000 of your dollars from the
Federal Government for his failed technology.


According to Bob Struble, receiver manufacturers didn't think there were any
HD radio stations broadcasting a couple of years ago and there were no FM
radio recievers available in 1963.


Well, that's it. Progress is held back by receiver manufacturers who won't
sell fancy new radios!!


Bob Struble is such a hoot.


Frank Dresser


Yea, his blog is nothing but lies. I have been getting threats from
one of his co-horts on Orbitcast about my blog, with threats of
lawsuits, for posting just references to newspaper articles and other
peoples' blogs. I never give personal opinions, or allow comments, or
post copyright material. These scammers are running scared - I've
gotten visitors from the DOJ, US Courts, Congressional Quarterly, FCC,
GAO, GSA, US House of Reps., etc... I have a feeling that the
investigation into the HD Radio farce, with NPR bilking Congress out
of tens-of-millions, is on the horizon. Struble tries to compare
today's media lanscape with iPods, iPhones, Internet, etc., to that of
the 1970's.



Based on my conversation with him, Booble Struble is running scared
and knows his system is failing to make any significant inroads in the
U.S. He makes strange analogies to early FM, etc. which make little
sense. He is under some delusion that he is a radio pioneer like
Frank Conrad, Edwin Armstrong, etc. I think he sees visions

He's basically in a denial mode and will probably have to be carried
off in a straight jacket at some point. Investor pressure is
becoming too hard for him to cope with. If any of you have any balls
you'll join in with his one-sided debate at www.ibiquity.com/about_us/message
and help push him over the edge.
  #5   Report Post  
Old July 30th 08, 06:41 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 157
Default Ibiquitys Struble wants to debate but not open to the public.

In a very real sense iBiquitys Booble Struble wants to have his cake
and eat it too. He wants his way with no public debate. He's in bed
with the FCC and wants commitments from the whole world to proliferate
his phony technology regardless of public opinion. He wants to shove
it down the consumers’ throat with Government funds and he actually
feels like the poor victim. He's a mental case.

And the fact is, he's very sensitive to groups like this. Goggle and
Yahoo are his archenemies because he can't shut up public debate in
forums like this and he's furious with them.

He can shut me up in his bogus Web Début but not here. He's a
technology whore and certainly not a radio pioneer.




  #6   Report Post  
Old July 30th 08, 01:06 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default HD-Radio [IBOC] : Thoughts on Radio’s Digital Future -by- Bob Struble

On Jul 29, 7:59*am, Rfburns wrote:
Robert Struble has opened up a new Web Column to debate HD radio but
in an email conversation with him he refuses to open up the debate
comments to the public.

He continues to distort the facts concerning the lack of success of
Hybrid Digital and in no way wants to open up a public discourse on
the subject. * I suggest anyone with interest read his message atwww.ibiquity.com/about_us/message

He just got another infusion of $40,000,000 of your dollars from the
Federal Government for his failed technology.

  #7   Report Post  
Old July 30th 08, 02:03 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 18
Default Ibiquitys Struble wants to debate but not open to the public.

It's a funny thing, on Ibiquity's homepage after 2005 they list no other
milestones.
  #8   Report Post  
Old July 30th 08, 02:53 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 227
Default Ibiquitys Struble wants to debate but not open to the public.

On Jul 30, 1:41*am, Rfburns wrote:
In a very real sense iBiquitys Booble Struble wants to have his cake
and eat it too. *He wants his way with no public debate. *He's in bed
with the FCC and wants commitments from the whole world to proliferate
his phony technology regardless of public opinion. *He wants to shove
it down the consumers’ throat with Government funds and he actually
feels like the poor victim. *He's a mental case.

And the fact is, he's very sensitive to groups like this. *Goggle and
Yahoo are his archenemies because he can't shut up public debate in
forums like this and he's furious with them.

He can shut me up in his bogus Web Début but not here. *He's a
technology whore and certainly not a radio pioneer.


He is probably furious with me for posting my blog all throughout
Google and Yahoo Finance. I have gotten about 90 viisitors from those
groups. Ah, such is life, and anonymous blogger First Amendment
Rights. As long as someone doesn't post that someone is having an
affair, and the likes, there is nothing Struble can do to stifle
public criticism - don't post anything libelous, and he is a fish out
of water.
  #10   Report Post  
Old July 30th 08, 08:22 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default Ibiquitys Struble wants to debate but not open to the public.

On Jul 30, 6:53*am, wrote:
On Jul 30, 1:41*am, Rfburns wrote:

In a very real sense iBiquitys Booble Struble wants to have his cake
and eat it too. *He wants his way with no public debate. *He's in bed
with the FCC and wants commitments from the whole world to proliferate
his phony technology regardless of public opinion. *He wants to shove
it down the consumers’ throat with Government funds and he actually
feels like the poor victim. *He's a mental case.


And the fact is, he's very sensitive to groups like this. *Goggle and
Yahoo are his archenemies because he can't shut up public debate in
forums like this and he's furious with them.


He can shut me up in his bogus Web Début but not here. *He's a
technology whore and certainly not a radio pioneer.


- He is probably furious with me for posting my blog
- all throughout Google and Yahoo Finance. I have
- gotten about 90 viisitors from those groups.
- Ah, such is life, and anonymous blogger First
- Amendment Rights. As long as someone doesn't
- post that someone is having an affair, and the likes,
- there is nothing Struble can do to stifle public criticism
- don't post anything libelous, and he is a fish out of water.

Wow you got a 'blog'

D'Oh 90 'viisitors' in a . . .

yeah you really are an 'anonymous blogger'
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Low-power HD chipsets - more Struble lies! gallant17 Shortwave 0 May 27th 08 02:38 PM
(OT) : 2008 Election Politics - Count Every Public Open Election Vote : Say No to RHF the news group retard Telamon Shortwave 4 May 24th 08 06:55 PM
Did a "Robert J. Struble Ibiquity" word search on Yahoo Rfburns Shortwave 7 May 15th 08 02:07 AM
The Great "Who Is George" Debate I Am Not George CB 12 March 18th 04 03:18 AM
Why don't you debate me? Lloyd Davies - The Time Lord Shortwave 16 March 17th 04 01:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017