| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Aug 19, 5:37 pm, Pocket-Radio wrote:
Take the simulated HD radio test drive. Talk about dirty rotten lies. Listen to their simulated comparisons of Am/Fm and their supposed HD sound. To be honest my 7 year old $12.00 mono clock radio sounds better than their simulated sound of Am/Fm. And their simulated HD sound really sucks. listen for below.. http://www.hdradio.com/how_does_hd_d...adio_sound.php What a big joke. Something is wrong when they have to degrade the sound of Am/Fm on purpose to make their system sound better. My GM factory radio sounds just a good. Do they really think we’re that stupid? I guess so! Did you read the NOTE at the bottom of the page? It tells you it's not a true replica. Obviously, the sound will only be as good as your internet connection and system, including speakers, will allow. The idea of this comparison is to push the idea that the HD Radio will sound much better than analog radio, as the similation clearly indicates. I think you missed the whole point. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| I'd love to test drive this Hammarlund Pro 310 | Shortwave | |||
| HELP: CST Microwave Studio: What means ,Maximum number of pulse widths simulated, ? | Antenna | |||
| Personal Radio Association (PRA) Membership Drive. | General | |||
| WTD : manual for General Radio dial drive | Equipment | |||
| WTD : manual for General Radio dial drive | Equipment | |||