Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
KaitoWRX911 wrote: Why does FM and SW use whip antennas, while AM uses directional internal ferrite-bar antennas? Couldn't the internal antenna be used for SW and FM, or vise-versa? Thanks... excuse my ignorance... Why not use a ferrite loopstick for SW and FM? 1. The ferrite core has a frequency response that depends on it's chemical and material structure. The formulas used for AM antennas quits working well enough to make it worthwhile up around 3-10 MHz. 2. Loopsticks are tuned antennas, so getting them to track the tuning of the rest of the radio at higher frequencies can be difficult. Why not use a whip for AM? 1. They do. Examples: the E1 and most car radios use whip antennas. But they're high impedance, from being so small a fraction of the wavelength at that frequency. So they'll pick up noisy electrical fields from power lines and stuff with static charges more than a loopstick. 2. They need a ground or counterpoise (which for a battery powered radio sitting on a table will be the stray capacitance of the circuitry with the rest of the universe). I find I can better reception of FM on my FR-200 (with a whip) using headphones, because the headphone cord (and my body) becomes the other half of the antenna. Mark Zenier Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sizing : The Loop Antenna -versus- the Long-Wire Antenna forShortwave Radio Listeners (SWLs) | Shortwave | |||
Vertical Whip Antennas And Gain Question ? | Antenna | |||
source for replacement whip antennas? | Shortwave | |||
Super-whippy whip antennas | Homebrew | |||
Super-whippy whip antennas | Homebrew |