Sarah Palin -debates- Joe Biden : Debate Analysis
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/03/debate.words/
CNN -analysis- Global Language Monitor - Austin, TX

* Grade Level : Palin 9.5 -v- Biden 7.8

* Total Words : Biden 5,492 -v- Palin 5,235

* Sentences per Paragraph : Biden 2.7 -v- Palin 2.6

* Letters per Word : Biden and Palin 'tied' at 4.4.

* Ease of Reading : Biden 66.7 -v- Palin 62.4

* Passive Voice : Palin 8% -v- Biden 5%

On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 03:17:08 -0700, RHF wrote:

Sarah Palin -debates- Joe Biden : Debate Analysis
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/03/debate.words/ CNN -analysis-
Global Language Monitor - Austin, TX

* Grade Level : Palin 9.5 -v- Biden 7.8

* Total Words : Biden 5,492 -v- Palin 5,235

* Sentences per Paragraph : Biden 2.7 -v- Palin 2.6

* Letters per Word : Biden and Palin 'tied' at 4.4.

* Ease of Reading : Biden 66.7 -v- Palin 62.4

* Passive Voice : Palin 8% -v- Biden 5%
.
the magic of numbers & the mystery of words ~ RHF
.

Don't be stupid! Anybody who ACTUALLY watched the debate knows how it
went. Palin could not even understand the questions otherwise she would
have answered them. She's the same crap as Bush

Bernard Peters wrote:
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 03:17:08 -0700, RHF wrote:

Sarah Palin -debates- Joe Biden : Debate Analysis
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/03/debate.words/ CNN -analysis-
Global Language Monitor - Austin, TX

* Grade Level : Palin 9.5 -v- Biden 7.8

* Total Words : Biden 5,492 -v- Palin 5,235

* Sentences per Paragraph : Biden 2.7 -v- Palin 2.6

* Letters per Word : Biden and Palin 'tied' at 4.4.

* Ease of Reading : Biden 66.7 -v- Palin 62.4

* Passive Voice : Palin 8% -v- Biden 5%
.
the magic of numbers & the mystery of words ~ RHF
.

- Don't be stupid! Anybody who ACTUALLY watched the debate
- knows how it went. Palin could not even understand
- the questions otherwise she would have answered them.
- She's the same crap as Bush

BP - Speaking of 'stupid' how are you ?

glad to see you are expressing your expert
{crap} opinion as always ~ RHF

In article , says...
RHF wrote:
Sarah Palin -debates- Joe Biden : Debate Analysis
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/03/debate.words/
CNN -analysis- Global Language Monitor - Austin, TX

* Grade Level : Palin 9.5 -v- Biden 7.8

* Total Words : Biden 5,492 -v- Palin 5,235

* Sentences per Paragraph : Biden 2.7 -v- Palin 2.6

* Letters per Word : Biden and Palin 'tied' at 4.4.

* Ease of Reading : Biden 66.7 -v- Palin 62.4

* Passive Voice : Palin 8% -v- Biden 5%
.
the magic of numbers & the mystery of words ~ RHF
.


You forgot to mention the end result: Joe Biden won!

JB



Details, details.

They don't care about that little detail, do they?

--
BDK

BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster

In article , rhf-
says...
John Barnard wrote:
RHF wrote:
Sarah Palin -debates- Joe Biden : Debate Analysis
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/03/debate.words/
CNN -analysis- Global Language Monitor - Austin, TX

* Grade Level : Palin 9.5 -v- Biden 7.8

* Total Words : Biden 5,492 -v- Palin 5,235

* Sentences per Paragraph : Biden 2.7 -v- Palin 2.6

* Letters per Word : Biden and Palin 'tied' at 4.4.

* Ease of Reading : Biden 66.7 -v- Palin 62.4

* Passive Voice : Palin 8% -v- Biden 5%
.
the magic of numbers & the mystery of words ~ RHF
.


You forgot to mention the end result: Joe Biden won!

JB


JB - That is what the 'experts' are Telling You To Think.
[ Over Intellectualizing the Process as a Real Debate ]

BUT - What Was The Average TV Viewer's Impression ? ? ?
After Seeing and Hearing the Performance of Sarah Palin
-versus- Joe Biden "On-Stage" together ? ? ?

Many/Most TV Viewers still came away LIKING Sarah Palin
'being' Sarah Palin and that's a WIN to Them !
[ Viewing the 'debate' as an Entertaining Performance ]
[ [ I Know What I Like On TV -and- I Liked Her ] ]

Comes-Down-To : The Viewer's Personal Impression
-and- How the Viewer 'Felt' About Each of Them
On-Stage facing-off One-on-One.
[ For Many 'Feelings' Are "Facts" ]
.
.
tv programming it's entertainment and this tv program
just happen to be called a 'debate' ~ RHF
.


You must have watched a "Special edition" and not the one I did. She
basically didn't answer any questions, not one. Biden knew the answers.
--
BDK

BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster

dxAce wrote:

John Barnard wrote:

RHF wrote:
Sarah Palin -debates- Joe Biden : Debate Analysis
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/03/debate.words/
CNN -analysis- Global Language Monitor - Austin, TX

* Grade Level : Palin 9.5 -v- Biden 7.8

* Total Words : Biden 5,492 -v- Palin 5,235

* Sentences per Paragraph : Biden 2.7 -v- Palin 2.6

* Letters per Word : Biden and Palin 'tied' at 4.4.

* Ease of Reading : Biden 66.7 -v- Palin 62.4

* Passive Voice : Palin 8% -v- Biden 5%
.
the magic of numbers & the mystery of words ~ RHF
.


You forgot to mention the end result: Joe Biden won!

Only in your dreams Canuck, only in your dreams.

I'm just about to fill out my absentee ballot and you can bet I'm not voting for
the dumbass Kenyan.



You sad, sad, sad, pathetic drunk! What a miserable cretin you are -
full of sound and fury signifying nothing! A creature to be pitied as
you suck back on your bile.

Go ahead - fill out your ballot. It'll be one of the few useful things
that you have done. Many others will be filling in their ballots for the
other guy.

JB

BDK wrote:
In article , says...
RHF wrote:
Sarah Palin -debates- Joe Biden : Debate Analysis
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/03/debate.words/
CNN -analysis- Global Language Monitor - Austin, TX

* Grade Level : Palin 9.5 -v- Biden 7.8

* Total Words : Biden 5,492 -v- Palin 5,235

* Sentences per Paragraph : Biden 2.7 -v- Palin 2.6

* Letters per Word : Biden and Palin 'tied' at 4.4.

* Ease of Reading : Biden 66.7 -v- Palin 62.4

* Passive Voice : Palin 8% -v- Biden 5%
.
the magic of numbers & the mystery of words ~ RHF
.


You forgot to mention the end result: Joe Biden won!

JB



Details, details.

They don't care about that little detail, do they?

Unfortunately, that does seem to be the case. Why go with the facts when
the entertainment factor, according to some posters, should be the
driving force for choosing the next POTUS.

Chilling. Truly chilling!

JB

John Barnard wrote:

dxAce wrote:

John Barnard wrote:

RHF wrote:
Sarah Palin -debates- Joe Biden : Debate Analysis
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/03/debate.words/
CNN -analysis- Global Language Monitor - Austin, TX

* Grade Level : Palin 9.5 -v- Biden 7.8

* Total Words : Biden 5,492 -v- Palin 5,235

* Sentences per Paragraph : Biden 2.7 -v- Palin 2.6

* Letters per Word : Biden and Palin 'tied' at 4.4.

* Ease of Reading : Biden 66.7 -v- Palin 62.4

* Passive Voice : Palin 8% -v- Biden 5%
.
the magic of numbers & the mystery of words ~ RHF
.


You forgot to mention the end result: Joe Biden won!

Only in your dreams Canuck, only in your dreams.

I'm just about to fill out my absentee ballot and you can bet I'm not voting for
the dumbass Kenyan.



You sad, sad, sad, pathetic drunk!

You sad, sad, sad, pathetic Canuck!

What a miserable cretin you are -
full of sound and fury signifying nothing! A creature to be pitied as
you suck back on your bile.

I certainly don't pity dumbass Canucks.

Go ahead - fill out your ballot.

I did!

It'll be one of the few useful things
that you have done.

More useful than a dumbass Canuck.

Many others will be filling in their ballots for the
other guy.

But not you! You're simply a dumbass Canuck.

John Barnard wrote:
BDK wrote:
In article , says...
RHF wrote:
Sarah Palin -debates- Joe Biden : Debate Analysis
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/03/debate.words/
CNN -analysis- Global Language Monitor - Austin, TX

* Grade Level : Palin 9.5 -v- Biden 7.8

* Total Words : Biden 5,492 -v- Palin 5,235

* Sentences per Paragraph : Biden 2.7 -v- Palin 2.6

* Letters per Word : Biden and Palin 'tied' at 4.4.

* Ease of Reading : Biden 66.7 -v- Palin 62.4

* Passive Voice : Palin 8% -v- Biden 5%
.
the magic of numbers & the mystery of words ~ RHF
.


You forgot to mention the end result: Joe Biden won!

JB



Details, details.


- - They don't care about that little detail, do they?

- Unfortunately, that does seem to be the case.
- Why go with the facts when the entertainment factor,
- according to some posters, should be the
- driving force for choosing the next POTUS.
-
- Chilling. Truly chilling!
-
- JB

JB,

Reality Sucks and Reality Votes. For Every Rocket Scientist
there are a Bakers Dozen of Joe Six-Packs and each and all
of their Votes Count Equally. One of those all to real truths
about a little thing called 'democracy' - Burp ! ~ RHF

dxAce wrote:

John Barnard wrote:

dxAce wrote:
John Barnard wrote:

RHF wrote:
Sarah Palin -debates- Joe Biden : Debate Analysis
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/03/debate.words/
CNN -analysis- Global Language Monitor - Austin, TX

* Grade Level : Palin 9.5 -v- Biden 7.8

* Total Words : Biden 5,492 -v- Palin 5,235

* Sentences per Paragraph : Biden 2.7 -v- Palin 2.6

* Letters per Word : Biden and Palin 'tied' at 4.4.

* Ease of Reading : Biden 66.7 -v- Palin 62.4

* Passive Voice : Palin 8% -v- Biden 5%
.
the magic of numbers & the mystery of words ~ RHF
.


You forgot to mention the end result: Joe Biden won!
Only in your dreams Canuck, only in your dreams.

I'm just about to fill out my absentee ballot and you can bet I'm not voting for
the dumbass Kenyan.



You sad, sad, sad, pathetic drunk!

You sad, sad, sad, pathetic Canuck!

What a miserable cretin you are -
full of sound and fury signifying nothing! A creature to be pitied as
you suck back on your bile.

I certainly don't pity dumbass Canucks.

Go ahead - fill out your ballot.

I did!

It'll be one of the few useful things
that you have done.

More useful than a dumbass Canuck.

Many others will be filling in their ballots for the
other guy.

But not you! You're simply a dumbass Canuck.



McSame abandoned Michigan - your issues with him are showing!

JB