Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Telamon" wrote in message
... The new band would offer different content from AM and FM. The content would be local or metro area specific. This would be in sync with the service area coverage, which is local. They would not carry syndicated programming. They would carry free commercial supported and for pay services. Who is this "different content" going to be aimed at? Virtually no one under 25 listens regularly to AM radio, and very few listen to FM. Everyone has the music/programs/whatever they want on their MP3 players and cell phones. Radio just isn't even on the radar for these people. That leaves the existing, aging AM/FM audience. So you end up splitting that audience, or that audience does not embrace the new content/frequency/radios. The former will kill both, the latter will just kill the new medium. If this was done 10 years ago, it MIGHT have made a difference. I just think it's too late to save AM radio, and FM is not far behind. As the quote goes, "Listening to radio is like listening to someone else's Ipod, with commercials". It is simply irrelevant to the current generation. Of course, it's entirely possible that as these kids get older and get interested in other things besides the latest Pop Tarts and Boy Bands (like sports/politics/news/talk), they may start listening. Or they may just download the shows and listen commercial free on their MP3 players and cell phones. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|