dxAce wrote:

What is really funny about this is the fact that folks were not voting FOR Obama as much as they were voting AGAINST Bush.

True, but...

....what is really funny is a statement like that coming from a HUGE Bush
supporter/defender such as yourself. Maybe the American voters have a
message in that for you...and maybe W wasn't as quite as wonderful as
you would want us to believe.

Billy Burpelson wrote:

dxAce wrote:

What is really funny about this is the fact that folks were not voting FOR Obama as much as they were voting AGAINST Bush.

True, but...

...what is really funny is a statement like that coming from a HUGE Bush
supporter/defender such as yourself. Maybe the American voters have a
message in that for you...and maybe W wasn't as quite as wonderful as
you would want us to believe.

What's really funny is that Bush wasn't running.

dxAce wrote:

What is really funny about this is the fact that folks were not voting FOR Obama as much as they were voting AGAINST Bush.

Billy Burpelson wrote:

True, but...
...what is really funny is a statement like that coming from a HUGE Bush
supporter/defender such as yourself. Maybe the American voters have a
message in that for you...and maybe W wasn't as quite as wonderful as
you would want us to believe.

dxAce wrote:

What's really funny is that Bush wasn't running.

Again, you are absolutely correct. However, that just goes to show you
how *absolutely ****ed* the voters were with W (and IMHO) his gang of
thieves, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, et al.

Heck of a job, Georgie!

Billy Burpelson wrote:

dxAce wrote:

What is really funny about this is the fact that folks were not voting FOR Obama as much as they were voting AGAINST Bush.

Billy Burpelson wrote:

True, but...
...what is really funny is a statement like that coming from a HUGE Bush
supporter/defender such as yourself. Maybe the American voters have a
message in that for you...and maybe W wasn't as quite as wonderful as
you would want us to believe.

dxAce wrote:

What's really funny is that Bush wasn't running.

Again, you are absolutely correct. However, that just goes to show you
how *absolutely ****ed* the voters were with W (and IMHO) his gang of
thieves, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, et al.

Uh, they weren't running either.

Guess I'm correct again. And guess what, Billy? You're stupid!

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:

dxAce wrote:

What is really funny about this is the fact that folks were not voting
FOR Obama as much as they were voting AGAINST Bush.

Billy Burpelson wrote:

True, but...
...what is really funny is a statement like that coming from a HUGE Bush
supporter/defender such as yourself. Maybe the American voters have a
message in that for you...and maybe W wasn't as quite as wonderful as
you would want us to believe.

dxAce wrote:

What's really funny is that Bush wasn't running.

Again, you are absolutely correct. However, that just goes to show you
how *absolutely ****ed* the voters were with W (and IMHO) his gang of
thieves, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, et al.

Uh, they weren't running either.

Guess I'm correct again. And guess what, Billy? You're stupid!

And clueless!

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Billy Burpelson wrote:

dxAce wrote:

What is really funny about this is the fact that folks were not voting FOR Obama as much as they were voting AGAINST Bush.
Billy Burpelson wrote:

True, but...
...what is really funny is a statement like that coming from a HUGE Bush
supporter/defender such as yourself. Maybe the American voters have a
message in that for you...and maybe W wasn't as quite as wonderful as
you would want us to believe.
dxAce wrote:

What's really funny is that Bush wasn't running.
Again, you are absolutely correct. However, that just goes to show you
how *absolutely ****ed* the voters were with W (and IMHO) his gang of
thieves, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, et al.

dxAce wrote:

Uh, they weren't running either.

Uh, didn't say they were. Please pay attention.

Guess I'm correct again. And guess what, Billy? You're stupid!

So what's your point? I agreed with -both- of *your* statements. I'm
stupid because I agreed with you?

Weak comeback, Steve. You're floundering.

Billy Burpelson wrote:


Billy Burpelson wrote:

dxAce wrote:

What is really funny about this is the fact that folks were not voting FOR Obama as much as they were voting AGAINST Bush.
Billy Burpelson wrote:

True, but...
...what is really funny is a statement like that coming from a HUGE Bush
supporter/defender such as yourself. Maybe the American voters have a
message in that for you...and maybe W wasn't as quite as wonderful as
you would want us to believe.
dxAce wrote:

What's really funny is that Bush wasn't running.
Again, you are absolutely correct. However, that just goes to show you
how *absolutely ****ed* the voters were with W (and IMHO) his gang of
thieves, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, et al.

dxAce wrote:

Uh, they weren't running either.

Uh, didn't say they were. Please pay attention.

Guess I'm correct again. And guess what, Billy? You're stupid!

So what's your point? I agreed with -both- of *your* statements. I'm
stupid because I agreed with you?

Weak comeback, Steve. You're floundering.

Perhaps, but my head is still out of the Kool-Aid. You've already been taking big gulps of it.

On Nov 16, 9:19*am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
dxAce wrote:

What is really funny about this is the fact that folks were not voting FOR Obama as much as they were voting AGAINST Bush.
Billy Burpelson wrote:
True, but...
...what is really funny is a statement like that coming from a HUGE Bush
supporter/defender such as yourself. Maybe the American voters have a
message in that for you...and maybe W wasn't as quite as wonderful as
you would want us to believe.
dxAce wrote:
What's really funny is that Bush wasn't running.

Again, you are absolutely correct. However, that just goes to show you
how *absolutely ****ed* the voters were

-with W (and IMHO) his gang of thieves,
Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle, et al.

Heck of a job, Georgie!

- = Notebook {Book-Mark} Post = -
The Obama Gang of Thieves : Biden, Emanuel, Hillary? . . .
-sub-text- The Corrupt {Criminal} Obama Administration
-aka- Chicago Stype Politics Comes To Washington DC

File : The Baracking© of the Obama Presidency

NOTE : "Baracking©" = The continued Daily 'process' of Conservative
Talk-Radio Host collectively "Borking" and
"Swiftboating" the Obama Presidency with a Vengeance.
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borking#.22Bork.22_as_verb
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiftboating
* http://townhall.com/columnists/Jonah...rican_politics
* http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/s...ftboating.html

building the list of the corrupt criminal obama
administration officials and counting the days
to the end of the obama presidency ~ RHF

OBTW : There are 1461 Days in a US Presidental Term.

Bob Dobbs wrote:

dxAce wrote:


Billy Burpelson wrote:

dxAce wrote:

What is really funny about this is the fact that folks were not voting FOR Obama as much as they were voting AGAINST Bush.

True, but...

...what is really funny is a statement like that coming from a HUGE Bush
supporter/defender such as yourself. Maybe the American voters have a
message in that for you...and maybe W wasn't as quite as wonderful as
you would want us to believe.

What's really funny is that Bush wasn't running.


Not the flesh and bull**** fool himself, but a continuity of his
policies and ideology under the hand of McCain.
...then there was that sideshow from Alaska
that couldn't sustain the distraction through election day.
Hey, maybe after a good night's sleep, and a hearty breakfast,
you'll have the energy and drive to try and connect all your Republican
failures to Clinton, the man who cleaned up after the previous Bush,
and before you know it, Obama will have cleaned up after this last one.

In your dreams, boy!

Aie taie aieeeeee taieeeee eyyyyy,,,,,, aie taie eyeeeeeeee,,,,,, ataie
taie eye ataie eyyyyyyy,,,,,,, that's the waves of
Gloryyyyyyyyyyyyy,,,,,,,,
cuhulin