http://projects.washingtonpost.com/2...esident/14680/


For a McCain victory, it all comes down to him carrying both Ohio and
Pennsylvania. If he does that, he wins.

On Nov 3, 6:55*am, Mike wrote:
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/2...esident/14680/

For a McCain victory, it all comes down to him carrying both Ohio and
Pennsylvania. If he does that, he wins.

Ohio Polls:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...obama-400.html

Florida Polls

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...obama-418.html

Obama Video; worth a watch

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0JhEtzch4Y

On Nov 3, 3:55*am, Mike wrote:

- http://projects.washingtonpost.com/2...esident/14680/
-
- For a McCain victory, it all comes down to him
- carrying both Ohio and Pennsylvania.
- If he does that, he wins.

MWB,

Not very likely - Maybe if he won both California
and New York... ROTFL - when hell freezes over ~ RHF

IMHO - Barack Hussein Obama looks to get around
333 Electoral College Votes and John "Smiley"
McCain getting the remaining.
http://www.electoral-vote.com/
Therefore McCain has to Win-Back 63 or more Electoral
College Votes to Win; and being very honest that does
not appear to be "Do-Able" but . . .
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...ce5e6a7cc89a30
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...ab28df32b2daa3

UNDECIDED VOTERS - Last Minute Reality-Check :
Undicided Voters there is still One Good Reason
to Vote FOR John "Smiley" McCain as a Counter
Balance to the One Party Control of the Entire
US Government by the Liberal Democrats :
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...f64568c9bc03cd
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...4216c3a11fb2c0
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...1130b583ae7f4e
Just Say No to "The Triumvirate" of :
Barack Hussein Obama - Liberal Democrat US President
Nancy Pelosi - Liberal Democrat Speaker of the US House
Harry Reid - Liberal Democrat Majority Leader of the US Senate

On Nov 3, 3:55*am, Mike wrote:

- http://projects.washingtonpost.com/2...esident/14680/
-
- For a McCain victory,
- it all comes down to him carrying both Ohio
- and Pennsylvania. If he does that, he wins.

MWB, {Put the "OT" in the Subject-Line for you.}

Not very likely - Maybe if he won both California
and New York... ROTFL - when hell freezes over ~ RHF

IMHO - Barack Hussein Obama looks to get around
333 Electoral College Votes and John "Smiley"
McCain getting the remaining.
http://www.electoral-vote.com/
Therefore McCain has to Win-Back 63 or more Electoral
College Votes to Win; and being very honest that does
not appear to be "Do-Able" but . . .
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...ce5e6a7cc89a30
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...ab28df32b2daa3

UNDECIDED VOTERS - Last Minute Reality-Check :
Undicided Voters there is still One Good Reason
to Vote FOR John "Smiley" McCain as a Counter
Balance to the One Party Control of the Entire
US Government by the Liberal Democrats :
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...f64568c9bc03cd
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...4216c3a11fb2c0
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...1130b583ae7f4e
Just Say No to "The Triumvirate" of :
Barack Hussein Obama - Liberal Democrat US President
Nancy Pelosi - Liberal Democrat Speaker of the US House
Harry Reid - Liberal Democrat Majority Leader of the US Senate

On Nov 3, 9:40*am, RHF wrote:
On Nov 3, 3:55*am, Mike wrote:

-http://projects.washingtonpost.com/2008/pick-your-president/14680/
-
- For a McCain victory,
- it all comes down to him carrying both Ohio
- and Pennsylvania. If he does that, he wins.

MWB, {Put the "OT" in the Subject-Line for you.}

Not very likely - Maybe if he won both California
and New York... ROTFL - when hell freezes over ~ RHF

IMHO - Barack Hussein Obama looks to get around
333 Electoral College Votes and John "Smiley"
McCain getting the remaining.http://www.electoral-vote.com/
Therefore McCain has to Win-Back 63 or more Electoral
College Votes to Win; and being very honest that does
not appear to be "Do-Able" but . . .http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...ab28df32b2daa3

UNDECIDED VOTERS - Last Minute Reality-Check :
Undicided Voters there is still One Good Reason
to Vote FOR John "Smiley" McCain as a Counter
Balance to the One Party Control of the Entire
US Government by the Liberal Democrats :http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...1130b583ae7f4e
Just Say No to "The Triumvirate" of :
Barack Hussein Obama - Liberal Democrat US President
Nancy Pelosi - Liberal Democrat Speaker of the US House
Harry Reid - Liberal Democrat Majority Leader of the US Senate
*.
Failing a Last Minute McCain Win then may
Barack Hussein Obama take his Oath-of-Office
and Serve All the American People with Honor
and Distinction; and may the USA Prosper under
his Leadership - Amen ~ RHF
*.
Let us all Pray for the Safety and Wellbeing
of Barack Hussein Obama and his Family during
these last 3 Critical Days of our Presidential
Election on 4 Nov 2008 - Amen ~ RHFhttp://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/be5a86d0104d4894
*.
A PRAYER FOR AMERICA AND OUR LEADERS - PTL & PBTA :
Let Us All Pray the Barack Hussein Obama Serves
All the American People well as the US President;
and Lives a Long Good Life after his Presidency.
and we all say : amen, Amen. and AMEN ! ~ RHFhttp://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/be5a86d0104d4894http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/056c94b192d7248e
*.
The 'Evil' of Not Voting : Just Vote "FOR"
Barack Hussein Obama -or- John 'Smiley' McCain.
Make Your Vote a Positive Affirmation of Your
Political Consciousness : Vote "FOR" What You
Believe-In -and- Not Against 'the-other-guy'.
* Be-a-Good-Citizen : JUST VOTE !
* Exercise Your Right-to-Vote : JUST VOTE !
* Responsible Citizens Vote : *JUST VOTE !
*.

The best data out there says:
Obama: 347
McCain: 191

And make no mistake: the SPANKING will be because of the nations
disgust with the party of George W. Bush, more than any other factor.

In article
,
wrote:

SNIP

The best data out there says:
Obama: 347
McCain: 191

And make no mistake: the SPANKING will be because of the nations
disgust with the party of George W. Bush, more than any other factor.

That's what you do best. You make mistakes continually.

What happened here is a bad economy together with the old liberal media
selling O-bla-ma to the sheep.

A year from now most O-bla-ma supporters will wish they could take their
vote back.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article
,
wrote:

SNIP

The best data out there says:
Obama: 347
McCain: 191

And make no mistake: the SPANKING will be because of the nations
disgust with the party of George W. Bush, more than any other factor.

That's what you do best. You make mistakes continually.

What happened here is a bad economy

That's all that matters. People ALWAYS vote based on their pocketbook.
It is ALWAYS the economy. If the economy was still going fine, McCain
would have won. Since the economy is in the tank, its time for a Change.
This is based on history, and is 100% accurate. In the last 30 years,
every time the presidency has changed parties, the economy has been in the
tank.

1980, Carter and 20% interest rates, 8% unemployment and 20% inflation.
Surprise, Reagan got elected!

1984, economy going strong. Surprise, Reagan re-elected!

1988, economy is still going strong. Surprise, Bush 1 got elected!

1992, recession and Bush reneged on his "no new taxes" pledge. Surprise,
Clinton is elected!

1996, economy going fine. Surprise, Clinton is re-elected!

2000, recession and "dot com bubble burst". Surprise, Bush 2 is elected!

2004, economy doing fine. Surprise, Bush is re-elected!

2008, economy in the tank, banks failing. Surprise, Obama is elected!

Learn from history, people. It is ALWAYS the economy. In 4 years if
things have not improved - Surprise, the Republican Candidate will be
elected! If the economy is humming along - Surprise, Obama is re-elected!

In article ,
"Bob Campbell" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article
,
wrote:

SNIP

The best data out there says: Obama: 347 McCain: 191

And make no mistake: the SPANKING will be because of the nations
disgust with the party of George W. Bush, more than any other
factor.

That's what you do best. You make mistakes continually.

What happened here is a bad economy

That's all that matters. People ALWAYS vote based on their
pocketbook. It is ALWAYS the economy. If the economy was still
going fine, McCain would have won. Since the economy is in the
tank, its time for a Change. This is based on history, and is 100%
accurate. In the last 30 years, every time the presidency has
changed parties, the economy has been in the tank.

1980, Carter and 20% interest rates, 8% unemployment and 20%
inflation. Surprise, Reagan got elected!

1984, economy going strong. Surprise, Reagan re-elected!

1988, economy is still going strong. Surprise, Bush 1 got elected!

1992, recession and Bush reneged on his "no new taxes" pledge.
Surprise, Clinton is elected!

1996, economy going fine. Surprise, Clinton is re-elected!

2000, recession and "dot com bubble burst". Surprise, Bush 2 is
elected!

2004, economy doing fine. Surprise, Bush is re-elected!

2008, economy in the tank, banks failing. Surprise, Obama is
elected!

Learn from history, people. It is ALWAYS the economy. In 4 years
if things have not improved - Surprise, the Republican Candidate will
be elected! If the economy is humming along - Surprise, Obama is
re-elected!

You understand because you have a clue but unfortunately many do not.

The economy is the number one reason but do not underestimate the power
of a campaign together with the old media to help make a candidate
palatable.

We are on the verge of electing a bent radical marxist who will not
release his birth certificate for scrutiny or his academic record so we
can see how brilliantly he has performed.

Mr. O-bla-ma how do you vote? Present.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:

A year from now most O-bla-ma supporters will wish they could take their
vote back.

Maybe...

....but in 2000, 31% of the people thought the country was on the wrong path.

In 2008, 79%(!) thought the country was on the wrong path.

It sounds like more than a few Bush supporters wish they could take
their vote back.

Waaaay heckuva job, Georgie!

In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Telamon wrote:

A year from now most O-bla-ma supporters will wish they could take their
vote back.

Maybe...

No maybe about it.

...but in 2000, 31% of the people thought the country was on the wrong path.

In 2008, 79%(!) thought the country was on the wrong path.

It sounds like more than a few Bush supporters wish they could take
their vote back.

Waaaay heckuva job, Georgie!

Yeah, so based on your numbers about 99% will want their O-bla-ma vote
back.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California