"Telamon" wrote in message
...
The commentary by some clown at IBM is pretty funny.

"The key innovation introduced in the past few years, Blair said, is
the ability to remotely control the devices fixed to power lines. That
way it can be told to switch frequency when it meets interference."

Someone needs to tell this idiot it is broadband noise and even of you
could switch to different frequency bands how the hell would they know
who was being interfered with? Just change the frequency band and
bother someone else. What a great idea.

You're not reading it properly. They don't care about CAUSING interference.
They want to be able to move it a bit when it RECEIVES (meets [with])
interference.

"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...
You're not reading it properly. They don't care about CAUSING
interference. They want to be able to move it a bit when it RECEIVES
(meets [with]) interference.


I swear I don't understand why people keep reviving this corpse. BPL will
never work.

"Bob Campbell" wrote in message
m...
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...
You're not reading it properly. They don't care about CAUSING
interference. They want to be able to move it a bit when it RECEIVES
(meets [with]) interference.


I swear I don't understand why people keep reviving this corpse. BPL
will never work.

It certainly is an engineering disaster... but then, the FCC seems to be
keen on engineering disasters of late..

Brenda Ann wrote:
"Bob Campbell" wrote in message
m...
"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...
You're not reading it properly. They don't care about CAUSING
interference. They want to be able to move it a bit when it RECEIVES
(meets [with]) interference.

I swear I don't understand why people keep reviving this corpse. BPL
will never work.

It certainly is an engineering disaster... but then, the FCC seems to be
keen on engineering disasters of late..


It's almost as if they want all electronic communications to be encoded
so that it can be easily controlled by a third party.