|
A Brave New America
David Hartung wrote:
The simple fact is that Bush has been at least as good as both of his immediate predecessors. "...as good as..." ??? Goodness has nothing to do with it. He has done way more harm to the Constitution and has completely destroyed any international goodwill, save for a few despotic regimes scattered around the planet, we may have once enjoyed. Then there's the whole deal with the economy in the ditch... |
A Brave New America
Dave wrote:
David Hartung wrote: The simple fact is that Bush has been at least as good as both of his immediate predecessors. "...as good as..." ??? Goodness has nothing to do with it. He has done way more harm to the Constitution and has completely destroyed any international goodwill, save for a few despotic regimes scattered around the planet, we may have once enjoyed. Then there's the whole deal with the economy in the ditch... George W Bush has done no more damage to our Constitution than did his Dad, or Bill Clinton. As to "international goodwill" Any "goodwill" Bush has cost us, has been lost because Bush has had the backbone to put our national interests ahead of the interests of others. Since this is part of what he is supposed to do as our president, I see no reason why I should worry about any "goodwill" that has been lost. |
A Brave New America
David Hartung wrote:
Dave wrote: David Hartung wrote: The simple fact is that Bush has been at least as good as both of his immediate predecessors. "...as good as..." ??? Goodness has nothing to do with it. He has done way more harm to the Constitution and has completely destroyed any international goodwill, save for a few despotic regimes scattered around the planet, we may have once enjoyed. Then there's the whole deal with the economy in the ditch... George W Bush has done no more damage to our Constitution than did his Dad, or Bill Clinton. As to "international goodwill" Any "goodwill" Bush has cost us, has been lost because Bush has had the backbone to put our national interests ahead of the interests of others. Since this is part of what he is supposed to do as our president, I see no reason why I should worry about any "goodwill" that has been lost. "...backbone..."??? WTF? It takes no courage to kill by remote control and to send other peoples' kids to die for the Empire. A courageous president would tell his people that the USA must learn to live within its means and that the country must not oppress people around the world because we need their resources for our machines. |
A Brave New America
Dave wrote:
David Hartung wrote: Dave wrote: David Hartung wrote: The simple fact is that Bush has been at least as good as both of his immediate predecessors. "...as good as..." ??? Goodness has nothing to do with it. He has done way more harm to the Constitution and has completely destroyed any international goodwill, save for a few despotic regimes scattered around the planet, we may have once enjoyed. Then there's the whole deal with the economy in the ditch... George W Bush has done no more damage to our Constitution than did his Dad, or Bill Clinton. As to "international goodwill" Any "goodwill" Bush has cost us, has been lost because Bush has had the backbone to put our national interests ahead of the interests of others. Since this is part of what he is supposed to do as our president, I see no reason why I should worry about any "goodwill" that has been lost. "...backbone..."??? WTF? It takes no courage to kill by remote control and to send other peoples' kids to die for the Empire. A courageous president would tell his people that the USA must learn to live within its means and that the country must not oppress people around the world because we need their resources for our machines. Oppress? You really need to learn what words mean. |
A Brave New America
In 1989 I bought my big old 1978 Dodge van from a guy by the last name
of Hartung. cuhulin |
Try Something Better : Simply Post An ON-TOPIC Shortwave RadioRelated Item Yourself
On Nov 21, 10:40*pm, "Hall Monitor" wrote:
- It's all Tela-turds fault..... Hall Monitor, D'Oh! - If You Post To It : It's Your Fault Too ! Good : Read Telamon -or- Ignore Telamon Try Something Better : Simply Post An ON-TOPIC Shortwave Radio Related Item Yourself. un-moderately yours ~ RHF |
A Brave New America
§tarkiller© writes:
§tarkiller© On 21 Nov 2008 17:51:06 -0500, wrote: David Hartung writes: David SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote: now this is funny, bush has completely destroyed the constitution, greed is rampant, bush singlehandedly destroyed the u.s. economy, and you're scared of the demcorats? you should be scared of the dumbass nazi neocon republican scum save america, kill a neocon today David If you will look around you, you will realize that your claim is David completely without merit. David Bush has destroyed nothing. He has come very close to destroying Iraq. By complete incompetence. §tarkiller© Yeah yeah sure sure, guess that's why so many less people are dying in §tarkiller© Iraq today than did under your hero Saddam yes? Far more people die today than under Saddam. What could have possibly made you think otherwise? Iraq is in the control of political parties created in Iran, and allied with Iran. Recently we made allies with unreformed Baathists in the Sunni areas, and have armed them. Now there are three Iraqi armies in Iraq --- the Peshmurga (Kurds), the offical Iraqi Army (Shiite and allied with Iran), and the new Sunni awakening army. When we leave, these three armies will have a full scale war. §tarkiller© Guess that's also why the Iraq oil business is booming raking in §tarkiller© billions to Iraq. Billions to the pro-Iranian Shiite parties. §tarkiller© Guess that's also why we see so few reports of fighting and deaths §tarkiller© these days compares to just a couple of years ago as well yes? There is a short term reduction in violence, and the Baathists have pretty much expelled al Queda. But the nation is ruined. He has destroyed our prestige in the world. §tarkiller© No, people like Soros, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and few choice §tarkiller© others traveling all over the world badmouthing the US to foreign §tarkiller© nations did a lot of that, along with liberals like yoursel that No, it was Bush arrogance and incompetence that did it. Very sad. §tarkiller© started screaming how horrible the US was even before Bush took office He is really one of the worst presidents of all time. §tarkiller© Another youngster not old enough to have experienced the Carter §tarkiller© administration no doubt. You are not a good mind reader. Carter's ineptness pales next to Bush's. §tarkiller© Not to worry though. It is likely you may see another Carteresque §tarkiller© presidency shortly. Perhaps, but it is hard to imagine it could be worse that Bush. Read some history. I can give you a good reading list to see the truth about the criminal incompetence of Bush. §tarkiller© Regards §tarkiller© §tarkiller© §tarkiller© 'A government big enough to give you everything you want, is §tarkiller© big enough to take away everything you have.' §tarkiller© "You cannot enrich the poor by impoverishing the rich." -- Andrew Hall (Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...) |
A Brave New America
wrote in message
... Read some history. I can give you a good reading list to see the truth about the criminal incompetence of Bush. Being incompetent is not a crime. If it was, then 75% of politicians, school teachers and telephone "product support" people would be in jail. |
A Brave New America
|
A Brave New America
Once in a very, very, very blue Moon I am on topic.
www.wireservices.com The radio and antenna stuff. cuhulin |
(OT) : After America Withdraws : The Up-Coming Civil War in Iraq :What Will Obama Do ?
On Nov 23, 7:51*am, wrote:
§tarkiller© *writes: * *§tarkiller© On 21 Nov 2008 17:51:06 -0500, wrote: * * David Hartung writes: * * * *David SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote: * * now this is funny, bush has completely destroyed the constitution, * * greed is rampant, bush singlehandedly destroyed the u.s. economy, * * and you're scared of the demcorats? * * you should be scared of the dumbass nazi neocon republican scum * * save america, kill a neocon today * * * *David If you will look around you, you will realize that your claim is * *David completely without merit. * * * *David Bush has destroyed nothing. * * * * He has come very close to destroying Iraq. * * By complete incompetence. * *§tarkiller© Yeah yeah sure sure, guess that's why so many less people are dying in * *§tarkiller© Iraq today than did under your hero Saddam yes? Far more people die today than under Saddam. *What could have possibly made you think otherwise? Iraq is in the control of political parties created in Iran, and allied with Iran. Recently we made allies with unreformed Baathists in the Sunni *areas, and have armed them. *Now there are three Iraqi armies in Iraq --- the Peshmurga (Kurds), the offical Iraqi Army (Shiite and allied with Iran), - and the new Sunni awakening army. "Sunni Awakening Army" sort of sounds like : Born Again Christians and Onward Christian Soldiers all rolled into one. http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/spl...nic_map416.gif - When we leave, these three armies - will have a full scale war. Note - Iraq was a Post Colonial* 'manufactured Nation designed to fail. * First the Ottomans and then the British Then Turkey will move in from the North and Iran will move in from the East. http://gulf2000.columbia.edu/images/...ligions_sm.jpg * *§tarkiller© Guess that's also why the Iraq oil business is booming raking in * *§tarkiller© billions to Iraq. Billions to the pro-Iranian Shiite parties. * *§tarkiller© Guess that's also why we see so few reports of fighting and deaths * *§tarkiller© these days compares to just a couple of years ago as well yes? There is a short term reduction in violence, and the Baathists have pretty much expelled al Queda. *But the nation is ruined. * * He has destroyed our prestige in the world. * *§tarkiller© No, people like Soros, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and few choice * *§tarkiller© others traveling all over the world badmouthing the US to foreign * *§tarkiller© nations did a lot of that, along with liberals like yoursel that No, it was Bush arrogance and incompetence that did it. Very sad. * *§tarkiller© started screaming how horrible the US was even before Bush took office * * * * He is really one of the worst presidents of * * all time. * *§tarkiller© Another youngster not old enough to have experienced the Carter * *§tarkiller© administration no doubt. You are not a good mind reader. *Carter's ineptness pales next to Bush's. * *§tarkiller© Not to worry though. *It is likely you may see another Carteresque * *§tarkiller© presidency shortly. Perhaps, but it is hard to imagine it could be worse that Bush. Read some history. *I can give you a good reading list to see the truth about the criminal incompetence of Bush. * * *§tarkiller© Regards * *§tarkiller© §tarkiller© * *§tarkiller© 'A government big enough to give you everything you want, is * *§tarkiller© big enough to take away everything you have.' * *§tarkiller© "You cannot enrich the poor by impoverishing the rich." -- Andrew Hall (Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...) |
(OT) : Telephone "Product Support" People - Residing in a Jail NearYou
On Nov 23, 8:06*am, "Bob Campbell" wrote:
wrote in message ... Read some history. *I can give you a good reading list to see the truth about the criminal incompetence of Bush. Being incompetent is not a crime. *If it was, then 75% of politicians, school teachers and - telephone "product support" people would be in jail. Note some Telephone "Product Support" People are in-fact 'residences' of Prisons. |
more off topic garbage by rhf aka Retired Halfassed Fool
Shortwave radio enthusiasts have a right to enjoy a newsgroup
which was established for them and is supposed to be dedicated to shortwave radio information. And they have a right to do so without wading through all the off topic garbage you post and it isn't incumbent upon them to filter obnoxious morons like you out, also many don't have the capability to do so. Start behaving like a responsible adult and filter yourself by posting your nonsense in the appropriate newsgroups. |
A Brave New America
|
more off topic garbage by rhf aka Retired Halfassed Fool
wrote in message ... Shortwave radio enthusiasts have a right to enjoy a newsgroup which was established for them and is supposed to be dedicated to shortwave radio information. And they have a right to do so without wading through all the off topic garbage you post and it isn't incumbent upon them to filter obnoxious morons like you out, also many don't have the capability to do so. Start behaving like a responsible adult and filter yourself by posting your nonsense in the appropriate newsgroups. Dear dxacer As far as I can see, he IS posting it in the appropriate groups. rec.radio.shortwave I belonged to many years ago and it was about as useful as tits on a boarhog. He is posting to alt.politics.republcans. And so are you. Physician heal thyself. Sir Charles the Curmudgeon |
A Brave New America
Bob Campbell wrote:
wrote in message ... Read some history. I can give you a good reading list to see the truth about the criminal incompetence of Bush. Being incompetent is not a crime. If it was, then 75% of politicians, school teachers and telephone "product support" people would be in jail. Caustic indifference and mean-spiritedness do not equal incompetence. |
A Brave New America
David Hartung wrote:
Dave wrote: wrote: §tarkiller© Another youngster not old enough to have experienced the Carter §tarkiller© administration no doubt. You are not a good mind reader. Carter's ineptness pales next to Bush's. §tarkiller© Not to worry though. It is likely you may see another Carteresque §tarkiller© presidency shortly. Perhaps, but it is hard to imagine it could be worse that Bush. Read some history. I can give you a good reading list to see the truth about the criminal incompetence of Bush. Contrary to the Reaganite Revisionist version of history, it was Jimmy Carter who maneuvered the Soviets into a prolonged war in Afghanistan. (Reagan was the one who let Osama go the Dark Side.) Your source for this theory? Robert Gates, current SecDef. The CIA begins covert action against the Communist government in Afghanistan, which is closely tied to the Soviet Union. Some time this year, the CIA begins training militants in Pakistan and beaming radio propaganda into Afghanistan. By April 1979, US officials are meeting with opponents of the Afghan government to determine their needs. [Blum, 1995, pp. 344] Robert Gates, who will become CIA Director in the early 1990s, will later recall that in a meeting on March 30, 1979, Under Secretary of Defense Walter Slocumbe wonders aloud whether there is “value in keeping the Afghan insurgency going, ‘sucking the Soviets into a Vietnamese quagmire.’” [Gates, 1996, pp. 145] In March 1979, there is a major revolt in Herat province, and in June and August there are large scale army mutinies. [Cooley, 2002, pp. 5] President Carter will formally approve covert aid to opponents of the government in July (see July 3, 1979), which will result in a Russian invasion in December (see December 8, 1979)." http://www.historycommons.org/contex...aafghanist an |
A Brave New America
On 21 Nov 2008 17:51:06 -0500, wrote: David Hartung writes: David SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote: now this is funny, bush has completely destroyed the constitution, greed is rampant, bush singlehandedly destroyed the u.s. economy, and you're scared of the demcorats? you should be scared of the dumbass nazi neocon republican scum save america, kill a neocon today He has come very close to destroying Iraq. By complete incompetence. §tarkiller© wrote: Yeah yeah sure sure, guess that's why so many less people are dying in Iraq today than did under your hero Saddam yes? Um, if you read carefully, he said "destroying Iraq" (the COUNTRY), not specifically that less people are dying. "Destroying Iraq" in that there is limited electricity, limited fresh water, limited sewage treatment, lack of medical care/equipment/pharmaceuticals, lack of fuel, lack of jobs and just generally having TRASHED the entire country. Guess that's also why the Iraq oil business is booming raking in billions to Iraq. So if they are "raking in billions", how would you explain why WE have to keep sinking billions in Iraq. Guess that's also why we see so few reports of fighting and deaths these days compares to just a couple of years ago as well yes? There are STILL all kinds of bombings...yes, less than "before", but still a SIGNIFICANT amount, still no picnic. He has destroyed our prestige in the world. No, people like Soros, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and few choice others traveling all over the world badmouthing the US to foreign nations did a lot of that, along with liberals like yoursel that started screaming how horrible the US was even before Bush took office What planet have YOU been on? Yes he HAS destroyed our prestige in the world, both in the Islamic world and in Europe. Most of the world realizes the "war" was fraudulent and bogus and therefore have a poor opinion of us. He is really one of the worst presidents of all time. Another youngster not old enough to have experienced the Carter administration no doubt. If W is so much better than Jimmah, does that mean we will be seeing W get his Nobel prize anytime soon? |
A Brave New America
Dave wrote:
David Hartung wrote: Dave wrote: wrote: §tarkiller© Another youngster not old enough to have experienced the Carter §tarkiller© administration no doubt. You are not a good mind reader. Carter's ineptness pales next to Bush's. §tarkiller© Not to worry though. It is likely you may see another Carteresque §tarkiller© presidency shortly. Perhaps, but it is hard to imagine it could be worse that Bush. Read some history. I can give you a good reading list to see the truth about the criminal incompetence of Bush. Contrary to the Reaganite Revisionist version of history, it was Jimmy Carter who maneuvered the Soviets into a prolonged war in Afghanistan. (Reagan was the one who let Osama go the Dark Side.) Your source for this theory? Robert Gates, current SecDef. The CIA begins covert action against the Communist government in Afghanistan, which is closely tied to the Soviet Union. Some time this year, the CIA begins training militants in Pakistan and beaming radio propaganda into Afghanistan. By April 1979, US officials are meeting with opponents of the Afghan government to determine their needs. [Blum, 1995, pp. 344] Robert Gates, who will become CIA Director in the early 1990s, will later recall that in a meeting on March 30, 1979, Under Secretary of Defense Walter Slocumbe wonders aloud whether there is “value in keeping the Afghan insurgency going, ‘sucking the Soviets into a Vietnamese quagmire.’” [Gates, 1996, pp. 145] In March 1979, there is a major revolt in Herat province, and in June and August there are large scale army mutinies. [Cooley, 2002, pp. 5] President Carter will formally approve covert aid to opponents of the government in July (see July 3, 1979), which will result in a Russian invasion in December (see December 8, 1979)." http://www.historycommons.org/contex...aafghanist an Very interesting, Thank you. |
A Brave New America
Billy Burpelson wrote:
Um, if you read carefully, he said "destroying Iraq" (the COUNTRY), not specifically that less people are dying. "Destroying Iraq" in that there is limited electricity, limited fresh water, limited sewage treatment, lack of medical care/equipment/pharmaceuticals, lack of fuel, lack of jobs and just generally having TRASHED the entire country. How recent is your information? Guess that's also why the Iraq oil business is booming raking in billions to Iraq. So if they are "raking in billions", how would you explain why WE have to keep sinking billions in Iraq. How are the two statements related? What planet have YOU been on? Yes he HAS destroyed our prestige in the world, both in the Islamic world and in Europe. Most of the world realizes the "war" was fraudulent and bogus and therefore have a poor opinion of us. You are aware that there is more to the "?world" than western Europe and Islam? Exactly what parts of the world constitute "most" and why should we care what they think? |
NHK World - Radio Japan on 9825 kHz @ 09:15 UTC
DX Acer @ gMail.Com = NNTP-Posting-Host : 12.154.10.254
So you want to actually read something about Shortwave Radio in this Newsgroup : Then First Try Posting something that is about Shortwave Radio yourself and being a Positive Contributor. NHK World - Radio Japan on 9825 kHz @ 09:15 UTC http://www.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/ NHK program topic "Rokugo" Japanese Comedy and a "Rokugo" preformer's tour of the USA. Plus NHK ID @ 09:18 UTC |
A Brave New America
|
A Brave New America
David Hartung wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote: David Hartung wrote: China is a communist nation. They wish to become the dominant power in the world, and they have never "liked" us. Why should we care what they think. Billy Burpelson wrote: "Why should we care what they think" you ask. Um, maybe because we have virtually no manufacturing base left. The Chinese have taken it over. (The "Arsenal of Democracy" has left the building). And maybe because they are bigger than us and either can now, or will soon be able to, kick our ass. David Hartung wrote: In other words you advise a policy based upon a fear of being defeated. That's why China actually enjoys buying into the massive American deficit. It can use capitalism to do something more attractive than defeat us: OWN us. No, I didn't advise any kind of "policy" at all. You just asked "why should we care?" and I responded -- that China could be a formidable enemy and, because of that, we -should- care. Sorry, won't work. Yes it will. Fear and greed are the two biggest motivators (well, OK, don't forget sex). To believe otherwise is to fool yourself. Perhaps I painted with too broad a brush. Communist China has never "liked" the USA. Today, they likely see us as the biggest obstacle to a world dominated by China. Even though we are their biggest customer, the Chinese do not like us, and for us to care what they think of our policies is foolishness. |
A Brave New America
Soumay Nonay wrote:
David Hartung wrote: In other words you advise a policy based upon a fear of being defeated. That's why China actually enjoys buying into the massive American deficit. It can use capitalism to do something more attractive than defeat us: OWN us. You make a very good point. As I recall, China holds a sizable percentage of US debt. Who do you think would be hurt worse, at least in the short run, if the US were to stop making any payments on debt held by the Chinese? Right now, I believe that such a move would come close to destroying China. Unfortunately, in the long term, it would hurt the USA even worse. |
A Brave New America
"David Hartung" wrote in message ... Soumay Nonay wrote: David Hartung wrote: In other words you advise a policy based upon a fear of being defeated. That's why China actually enjoys buying into the massive American deficit. It can use capitalism to do something more attractive than defeat us: OWN us. You make a very good point. As I recall, China holds a sizable percentage of US debt. Who do you think would be hurt worse, at least in the short run, if the US were to stop making any payments on debt held by the Chinese? Right now, I believe that such a move would come close to destroying China. Unfortunately, in the long term, it would hurt the USA even worse. I'm not sure it would hurt China at all. It's most likely a calculated bet on their part: if we default, and they stop supplying us with cheap consumer goods, we lose. We have no manufacturing base to replace them, and it would take a sizable part of our GDP to rebuild them, along with likely a decade or more, during which we would have to simply do without much of what we now take for granted in our daily lives. China takes over the place we formerly held as the world's leading economy. If we ever pay off all the debt, China still wins, because they will have all those trillions going directly into their economy. |
A Brave New America
Brenda Ann wrote: I'm not sure it would hurt China at all. It's most likely a calculated bet on their part: if we default, and they stop supplying us with cheap consumer goods, we lose. We have no manufacturing base to replace them, and it would take a sizable part of our GDP to rebuild them, along with likely a decade or more, during which we would have to simply do without much of what we now take for granted in our daily lives. China takes over the place we formerly held as the world's leading economy. If we ever pay off all the debt, China still wins, because they will have all those trillions going directly into their economy. "Outsourcing is GOOD for this country" -- George W. Bush Heck of a job, Georgie! |
A Brave New America
David Hartung wrote:
wrote: On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:34:23 -0600, David Hartung wrote: Exactly what parts of the world constitute "most" and why should we care what they think? Because, Hartung THEY are on the rise, becoming more and more adept at capitalism, need more and more resources, are in global competition, and closer to the strategic petroleum reserves in the world. China---1.2 billion China is a communist nation. They wish to become the dominant power in the world, and they have never "liked" us. Why should we care what they think. China is as far as you can get from Communism. They are a fascist dictatorship. |
A Brave New America
David Hartung writes:
David Dave wrote: David Hartung wrote: Dave wrote: wrote: §tarkiller© Another youngster not old enough to have experienced the Carter §tarkiller© administration no doubt. You are not a good mind reader. Carter's ineptness pales next to Bush's. §tarkiller© Not to worry though. It is likely you may see another Carteresque §tarkiller© presidency shortly. Perhaps, but it is hard to imagine it could be worse that Bush. Read some history. I can give you a good reading list to see the truth about the criminal incompetence of Bush. Contrary to the Reaganite Revisionist version of history, it was Jimmy Carter who maneuvered the Soviets into a prolonged war in Afghanistan. (Reagan was the one who let Osama go the Dark Side.) Your source for this theory? Robert Gates, current SecDef. The CIA begins covert action against the Communist government in Afghanistan, which is closely tied to the Soviet Union. Some time this year, the CIA begins training militants in Pakistan and beaming radio propaganda into Afghanistan. By April 1979, US officials are meeting with opponents of the Afghan government to determine their needs. [Blum, 1995, pp. 344] Robert Gates, who will become CIA Director in the early 1990s, will later recall that in a meeting on March 30, 1979, Under Secretary of Defense Walter Slocumbe wonders aloud whether there is “value in keeping the Afghan insurgency going, ‘sucking the Soviets into a Vietnamese quagmire.’” [Gates, 1996, pp. 145] In March 1979, there is a major revolt in Herat province, and in June and August there are large scale army mutinies. [Cooley, 2002, pp. 5] President Carter will formally approve covert aid to opponents of the government in July (see July 3, 1979), which will result in a Russian invasion in December (see December 8, 1979)." http://www.historycommons.org/contex...aafghanist an David Very interesting, Thank you. Steve Coll wrote a wonderful book called "Ghost Wars" about the whole Afghan/Soviet era, and a bit beyond. I cannot recommend it enough. -- Andrew Hall (Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...) |
A Brave New America
|
Rush Limbaugh Show via AFN Hawaii on 10,320 kHz [USB] @ 17:23 UTC
Rush Limbaugh Show via AFN Hawaii on 10,320 kHz [USB] @ 17:23 UTC
America Forces Network [AFN] = http://myafn.dodmedia.osd.mil/ * American Forces Radio and Television Service [AFRTS] AFRTS = http://afrts.dodmedia.osd.mil/ Rush Limbaugh Show - Today's Question "Where Is Obama ?" http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rush_Limbaugh President-Elect Barack Hussein Obama -said- "America Only Has One President At A Time" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PPNb9srnGs NOTE - That the Voice-of-America [VOA] read a comment by the US President-Elect Barack Hussein Obama -wrt- the "G20" Meeting -that- At This Time the US has Only One President and That Is President Bush. http://www.thedailytimes.com/article...NEWS/311089977 {Hello Rush that's still spelled B-U-S-H until 20 JAN 2009} HEY - Maybe soon VOA will stand for Voice Obama's America :-} HELLO - Rush ya can't be blame "The Obama" if'n . . . he ain't on-da-clock yet : GWB is still on da J-O-B [.] - - - handle it george ;-} America Forces Network [AFN] Here are the Current AFN Shortwave Radio High Frequencies via Single-Side-Band [SSB] using Upper Sideband [USB] http://myafn.dodmedia.osd.mil/ShortWave.aspx Source/Location : Pearl Harbor, Hawaii -USA- [ Center of the Northern Pacific Ocean ] Days on 10,320 KHz [USB] Nights on 6,350 KHz [USB] AFN Radio Program Schedule http://myafn.dodmedia.osd.mil/AFNRadio.aspx American Forces Network (AFN) -aka- AFRTS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armed_Forces_Radio AFN Shortwave Radio [HF-USB] Broadcasts http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armed_F...Wave_.28USB.29 |
Radio Australia [RA-ABC] on 9580 & 9710 kHz @ 17:00 UTC
Radio Australia [RA-ABC] on 9580 & 9710 kHz @ 17:00 UTC
http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/ RA-ABC - http://www.abc.net.au/ra/ Both Frequencies were carrying a news item-interview with Rupert Murdoch [News-Corp] and the Moderization of the Print Media in the UK http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupert_...ons_in_Britain Radio Australia [RA-ABC] "Ways to Listen" http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/waystolisten/ includes a link to Shortwave Radio Frequency Guide Radio Australia [RA-ABC] Shortwave Radio Frequency Guide http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/pdf...ency_guide.pdf Radio Australia [RA-ABC] 24 Hour Program Schedule: USA http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/programguide/usa.htm Radio Australia [RA-ABC] Program Guide including http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/programguide/ Program Schedules & Find a Program & Program List yes i heard it on the ray-di-oh ~ RHF Twain Harte, CA -USA- |
Radio Australia [RA-ABC] on 9580 & 9710 kHz @ 17:00 UTC
In article ,
RHF wrote: Radio Australia [RA-ABC] on 9580 & 9710 kHz @ 17:00 UTC http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/ RA-ABC - http://www.abc.net.au/ra/ (West Coast North America), Also try 11880 kHz at 18-19:00UTC. Mark Zenier Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com) |
Radio Australia [RA-ABC] on 9580 & 9710 kHz @ 17:00 UTC
In article ,
(Mark Zenier) wrote: In article , RHF wrote: Radio Australia [RA-ABC] on 9580 & 9710 kHz @ 17:00 UTC http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/ RA-ABC - http://www.abc.net.au/ra/ (West Coast North America), Also try 11880 kHz at 18-19:00UTC. Mark Zenier Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com) 11880 has been good for me lately but they usually fade out by 18:30UTC. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com