On 21 Nov 2008 17:51:06 -0500, wrote:

David Hartung writes:

David SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote:
now this is funny, bush has completely destroyed the constitution,
greed is rampant, bush singlehandedly destroyed the u.s. economy,
and you're scared of the demcorats?
you should be scared of the dumbass nazi neocon republican scum
save america, kill a neocon today

David If you will look around you, you will realize that your claim is
David completely without merit.

David Bush has destroyed nothing.

He has come very close to destroying Iraq.
By complete incompetence.

Yeah yeah sure sure, guess that's why so many less people are dying in
Iraq today than did under your hero Saddam yes?
Guess that's also why the Iraq oil business is booming raking in
billions to Iraq.
Guess that's also why we see so few reports of fighting and deaths
these days compares to just a couple of years ago as well yes?

He has destroyed our prestige in the world.

No, people like Soros, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and few choice
others traveling all over the world badmouthing the US to foreign
nations did a lot of that, along with liberals like yoursel that
started screaming how horrible the US was even before Bush took office

He is really one of the worst presidents of
all time.

Another youngster not old enough to have experienced the Carter
administration no doubt.
Not to worry though. It is likely you may see another Carteresque
presidency shortly.









Regards


§tarkiller©








'A government big enough to give you everything you want, is
big enough to take away everything you have.'

"You cannot enrich the poor by impoverishing the rich."

§tarkiller© wrote:
On 21 Nov 2008 17:51:06 -0500, wrote:

David Hartung writes:

David SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote:
now this is funny, bush has completely destroyed the
constitution, greed is rampant, bush singlehandedly destroyed
the u.s. economy, and you're scared of the demcorats?
you should be scared of the dumbass nazi neocon republican scum
save america, kill a neocon today

David If you will look around you, you will realize that your
claim is David completely without merit.

David Bush has destroyed nothing.

He has come very close to destroying Iraq.
By complete incompetence.

Yeah yeah sure sure, guess that's why so many less people are dying in
Iraq today than did under your hero Saddam yes?
Guess that's also why the Iraq oil business is booming raking in
billions to Iraq.
Guess that's also why we see so few reports of fighting and deaths
these days compares to just a couple of years ago as well yes?

He has destroyed our prestige in the world.

No, people like Soros, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and few choice
others traveling all over the world badmouthing the US to foreign
nations did a lot of that, along with liberals like yoursel that
started screaming how horrible the US was even before Bush took office

He is really one of the worst presidents of
all time.

Another youngster not old enough to have experienced the Carter
administration no doubt.
Not to worry though. It is likely you may see another Carteresque
presidency shortly.









Regards


§tarkiller©








'A government big enough to give you everything you want, is
big enough to take away everything you have.'

"You cannot enrich the poor by impoverishing the rich."

The fact is that your admired GW is arguably the Worst President
in American History, StarZero. It's a common discussion among
scholars of American politics.

And being against the illegal George W. Bush Iraq War does not
imply that Saddam Hussain was their "hero". And remember that
under the earlier Bush administration, Rumsfeld was one of the
people shaking Saddam's hand, as he was supplying U.S. weapons,
including chemical ones, to fight Iran.

Your stupidity extends to the notion that anyone not a slobbering
right wing idiot such as yourself must be a left wing extremist.
It simply isn't so. People with common sense have realized all along
just what a sad excuse GW has been as 'president'..

Iva Biggin wrote:

The fact is that your admired GW is arguably the Worst President
in American History, StarZero. It's a common discussion among
scholars of American politics.

Who would these "scholars" be?

And being against the illegal George W. Bush Iraq War does not
imply that Saddam Hussain was their "hero". And remember that
under the earlier Bush administration, Rumsfeld was one of the
people shaking Saddam's hand, as he was supplying U.S. weapons,
including chemical ones, to fight Iran.

Your stupidity extends to the notion that anyone not a slobbering
right wing idiot such as yourself must be a left wing extremist.
It simply isn't so. People with common sense have realized all along
just what a sad excuse GW has been as 'president'..

The simple fact is that Bush has been at least as good as both of his
immediate predecessors.

David Hartung wrote:


The simple fact is that Bush has been at least as good as both of his
immediate predecessors.


"...as good as..." ???

Goodness has nothing to do with it.

He has done way more harm to the Constitution and has completely
destroyed any international goodwill, save for a few despotic regimes
scattered around the planet, we may have once enjoyed.

Then there's the whole deal with the economy in the ditch...

Dave wrote:
David Hartung wrote:


The simple fact is that Bush has been at least as good as both of his
immediate predecessors.


"...as good as..." ???

Goodness has nothing to do with it.

He has done way more harm to the Constitution and has completely
destroyed any international goodwill, save for a few despotic regimes
scattered around the planet, we may have once enjoyed.

Then there's the whole deal with the economy in the ditch...

George W Bush has done no more damage to our Constitution than did his
Dad, or Bill Clinton.

As to "international goodwill" Any "goodwill" Bush has cost us, has been
lost because Bush has had the backbone to put our national interests
ahead of the interests of others. Since this is part of what he is
supposed to do as our president, I see no reason why I should worry
about any "goodwill" that has been lost.

David Hartung wrote:
Dave wrote:
David Hartung wrote:


The simple fact is that Bush has been at least as good as both of his
immediate predecessors.


"...as good as..." ???

Goodness has nothing to do with it.

He has done way more harm to the Constitution and has completely
destroyed any international goodwill, save for a few despotic regimes
scattered around the planet, we may have once enjoyed.

Then there's the whole deal with the economy in the ditch...

George W Bush has done no more damage to our Constitution than did his
Dad, or Bill Clinton.

As to "international goodwill" Any "goodwill" Bush has cost us, has been
lost because Bush has had the backbone to put our national interests
ahead of the interests of others. Since this is part of what he is
supposed to do as our president, I see no reason why I should worry
about any "goodwill" that has been lost.


"...backbone..."??? WTF?

It takes no courage to kill by remote control and to send other peoples'
kids to die for the Empire. A courageous president would tell his
people that the USA must learn to live within its means and that the
country must not oppress people around the world because we need their
resources for our machines.

Dave wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Dave wrote:
David Hartung wrote:


The simple fact is that Bush has been at least as good as both of
his immediate predecessors.


"...as good as..." ???

Goodness has nothing to do with it.

He has done way more harm to the Constitution and has completely
destroyed any international goodwill, save for a few despotic regimes
scattered around the planet, we may have once enjoyed.

Then there's the whole deal with the economy in the ditch...

George W Bush has done no more damage to our Constitution than did his
Dad, or Bill Clinton.

As to "international goodwill" Any "goodwill" Bush has cost us, has
been lost because Bush has had the backbone to put our national
interests ahead of the interests of others. Since this is part of what
he is supposed to do as our president, I see no reason why I should
worry about any "goodwill" that has been lost.


"...backbone..."??? WTF?

It takes no courage to kill by remote control and to send other peoples'
kids to die for the Empire. A courageous president would tell his
people that the USA must learn to live within its means and that the
country must not oppress people around the world because we need their
resources for our machines.

Oppress?

You really need to learn what words mean.

§tarkiller© writes:

§tarkiller© On 21 Nov 2008 17:51:06 -0500, wrote:
David Hartung writes:

David SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote:
now this is funny, bush has completely destroyed the constitution,
greed is rampant, bush singlehandedly destroyed the u.s. economy,
and you're scared of the demcorats?
you should be scared of the dumbass nazi neocon republican scum
save america, kill a neocon today

David If you will look around you, you will realize that your claim is
David completely without merit.

David Bush has destroyed nothing.

He has come very close to destroying Iraq.
By complete incompetence.

§tarkiller© Yeah yeah sure sure, guess that's why so many less people are dying in
§tarkiller© Iraq today than did under your hero Saddam yes?

Far more people die today than under Saddam. What could have
possibly made you think otherwise?

Iraq is in the control of political parties created in Iran, and
allied with Iran.

Recently we made allies with unreformed Baathists in the Sunni areas,
and have armed them. Now there are three Iraqi armies in Iraq --- the
Peshmurga (Kurds), the offical Iraqi Army (Shiite and allied with Iran),
and the new Sunni awakening army.

When we leave, these three armies will have a full scale war.

§tarkiller© Guess that's also why the Iraq oil business is booming raking in
§tarkiller© billions to Iraq.

Billions to the pro-Iranian Shiite parties.

§tarkiller© Guess that's also why we see so few reports of fighting and deaths
§tarkiller© these days compares to just a couple of years ago as well yes?

There is a short term reduction in violence, and the Baathists have pretty
much expelled al Queda. But the nation is ruined.

He has destroyed our prestige in the world.

§tarkiller© No, people like Soros, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and few choice
§tarkiller© others traveling all over the world badmouthing the US to foreign
§tarkiller© nations did a lot of that, along with liberals like yoursel that

No, it was Bush arrogance and incompetence that did it.

Very sad.

§tarkiller© started screaming how horrible the US was even before Bush took office

He is really one of the worst presidents of
all time.

§tarkiller© Another youngster not old enough to have experienced the Carter
§tarkiller© administration no doubt.

You are not a good mind reader. Carter's ineptness pales next to Bush's.

§tarkiller© Not to worry though. It is likely you may see another Carteresque
§tarkiller© presidency shortly.

Perhaps, but it is hard to imagine it could be worse that Bush.

Read some history. I can give you a good reading list to see the truth
about the criminal incompetence of Bush.








§tarkiller© Regards


§tarkiller© §tarkiller©








§tarkiller© 'A government big enough to give you everything you want, is
§tarkiller© big enough to take away everything you have.'

§tarkiller© "You cannot enrich the poor by impoverishing the rich."


--
Andrew Hall
(Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)

wrote in message
...
Read some history. I can give you a good reading list to see the truth
about the criminal incompetence of Bush.

Being incompetent is not a crime. If it was, then 75% of politicians,
school teachers and telephone "product support" people would be in jail.

Once in a very, very, very blue Moon I am on topic.
www.wireservices.com

The radio and antenna stuff.
cuhulin