Iva Biggin wrote:

The fact is that your admired GW is arguably the Worst President
in American History, StarZero. It's a common discussion among
scholars of American politics.

Who would these "scholars" be?

And being against the illegal George W. Bush Iraq War does not
imply that Saddam Hussain was their "hero". And remember that
under the earlier Bush administration, Rumsfeld was one of the
people shaking Saddam's hand, as he was supplying U.S. weapons,
including chemical ones, to fight Iran.

Your stupidity extends to the notion that anyone not a slobbering
right wing idiot such as yourself must be a left wing extremist.
It simply isn't so. People with common sense have realized all along
just what a sad excuse GW has been as 'president'..

The simple fact is that Bush has been at least as good as both of his
immediate predecessors.

David Hartung wrote:


The simple fact is that Bush has been at least as good as both of his
immediate predecessors.


"...as good as..." ???

Goodness has nothing to do with it.

He has done way more harm to the Constitution and has completely
destroyed any international goodwill, save for a few despotic regimes
scattered around the planet, we may have once enjoyed.

Then there's the whole deal with the economy in the ditch...

Dave wrote:
David Hartung wrote:


The simple fact is that Bush has been at least as good as both of his
immediate predecessors.


"...as good as..." ???

Goodness has nothing to do with it.

He has done way more harm to the Constitution and has completely
destroyed any international goodwill, save for a few despotic regimes
scattered around the planet, we may have once enjoyed.

Then there's the whole deal with the economy in the ditch...

George W Bush has done no more damage to our Constitution than did his
Dad, or Bill Clinton.

As to "international goodwill" Any "goodwill" Bush has cost us, has been
lost because Bush has had the backbone to put our national interests
ahead of the interests of others. Since this is part of what he is
supposed to do as our president, I see no reason why I should worry
about any "goodwill" that has been lost.

David Hartung wrote:
Dave wrote:
David Hartung wrote:


The simple fact is that Bush has been at least as good as both of his
immediate predecessors.


"...as good as..." ???

Goodness has nothing to do with it.

He has done way more harm to the Constitution and has completely
destroyed any international goodwill, save for a few despotic regimes
scattered around the planet, we may have once enjoyed.

Then there's the whole deal with the economy in the ditch...

George W Bush has done no more damage to our Constitution than did his
Dad, or Bill Clinton.

As to "international goodwill" Any "goodwill" Bush has cost us, has been
lost because Bush has had the backbone to put our national interests
ahead of the interests of others. Since this is part of what he is
supposed to do as our president, I see no reason why I should worry
about any "goodwill" that has been lost.


"...backbone..."??? WTF?

It takes no courage to kill by remote control and to send other peoples'
kids to die for the Empire. A courageous president would tell his
people that the USA must learn to live within its means and that the
country must not oppress people around the world because we need their
resources for our machines.

Dave wrote:
David Hartung wrote:
Dave wrote:
David Hartung wrote:


The simple fact is that Bush has been at least as good as both of
his immediate predecessors.


"...as good as..." ???

Goodness has nothing to do with it.

He has done way more harm to the Constitution and has completely
destroyed any international goodwill, save for a few despotic regimes
scattered around the planet, we may have once enjoyed.

Then there's the whole deal with the economy in the ditch...

George W Bush has done no more damage to our Constitution than did his
Dad, or Bill Clinton.

As to "international goodwill" Any "goodwill" Bush has cost us, has
been lost because Bush has had the backbone to put our national
interests ahead of the interests of others. Since this is part of what
he is supposed to do as our president, I see no reason why I should
worry about any "goodwill" that has been lost.


"...backbone..."??? WTF?

It takes no courage to kill by remote control and to send other peoples'
kids to die for the Empire. A courageous president would tell his
people that the USA must learn to live within its means and that the
country must not oppress people around the world because we need their
resources for our machines.

Oppress?

You really need to learn what words mean.

In 1989 I bought my big old 1978 Dodge van from a guy by the last name
of Hartung.
cuhulin