§tarkiller© writes:

§tarkiller© On 21 Nov 2008 17:51:06 -0500, wrote:
David Hartung writes:

David SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote:
now this is funny, bush has completely destroyed the constitution,
greed is rampant, bush singlehandedly destroyed the u.s. economy,
and you're scared of the demcorats?
you should be scared of the dumbass nazi neocon republican scum
save america, kill a neocon today

David If you will look around you, you will realize that your claim is
David completely without merit.

David Bush has destroyed nothing.

He has come very close to destroying Iraq.
By complete incompetence.

§tarkiller© Yeah yeah sure sure, guess that's why so many less people are dying in
§tarkiller© Iraq today than did under your hero Saddam yes?

Far more people die today than under Saddam. What could have
possibly made you think otherwise?

Iraq is in the control of political parties created in Iran, and
allied with Iran.

Recently we made allies with unreformed Baathists in the Sunni areas,
and have armed them. Now there are three Iraqi armies in Iraq --- the
Peshmurga (Kurds), the offical Iraqi Army (Shiite and allied with Iran),
and the new Sunni awakening army.

When we leave, these three armies will have a full scale war.

§tarkiller© Guess that's also why the Iraq oil business is booming raking in
§tarkiller© billions to Iraq.

Billions to the pro-Iranian Shiite parties.

§tarkiller© Guess that's also why we see so few reports of fighting and deaths
§tarkiller© these days compares to just a couple of years ago as well yes?

There is a short term reduction in violence, and the Baathists have pretty
much expelled al Queda. But the nation is ruined.

He has destroyed our prestige in the world.

§tarkiller© No, people like Soros, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and few choice
§tarkiller© others traveling all over the world badmouthing the US to foreign
§tarkiller© nations did a lot of that, along with liberals like yoursel that

No, it was Bush arrogance and incompetence that did it.

Very sad.

§tarkiller© started screaming how horrible the US was even before Bush took office

He is really one of the worst presidents of
all time.

§tarkiller© Another youngster not old enough to have experienced the Carter
§tarkiller© administration no doubt.

You are not a good mind reader. Carter's ineptness pales next to Bush's.

§tarkiller© Not to worry though. It is likely you may see another Carteresque
§tarkiller© presidency shortly.

Perhaps, but it is hard to imagine it could be worse that Bush.

Read some history. I can give you a good reading list to see the truth
about the criminal incompetence of Bush.








§tarkiller© Regards


§tarkiller© §tarkiller©








§tarkiller© 'A government big enough to give you everything you want, is
§tarkiller© big enough to take away everything you have.'

§tarkiller© "You cannot enrich the poor by impoverishing the rich."


--
Andrew Hall
(Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)

wrote in message
...
Read some history. I can give you a good reading list to see the truth
about the criminal incompetence of Bush.

Being incompetent is not a crime. If it was, then 75% of politicians,
school teachers and telephone "product support" people would be in jail.

Once in a very, very, very blue Moon I am on topic.
www.wireservices.com

The radio and antenna stuff.
cuhulin

On Nov 23, 8:06*am, "Bob Campbell" wrote:
wrote in message

...

Read some history. *I can give you a good reading list to see the truth
about the criminal incompetence of Bush.

Being incompetent is not a crime. *If it was, then 75% of politicians,
school teachers and

- telephone "product support" people would be in jail.

Note some Telephone "Product Support" People
are in-fact 'residences' of Prisons.

Shortwave radio enthusiasts have a right to enjoy a newsgroup
which was established for them and is supposed to be dedicated to
shortwave radio information.

And they have a right to do so without wading through all the off
topic garbage you post and it isn't incumbent upon them to filter
obnoxious morons like you out, also many don't have the capability to
do so.

Start behaving like a responsible adult and filter yourself by posting
your nonsense in the appropriate newsgroups.

wrote in message
...
Shortwave radio enthusiasts have a right to enjoy a newsgroup
which was established for them and is supposed to be dedicated to
shortwave radio information.

And they have a right to do so without wading through all the off
topic garbage you post and it isn't incumbent upon them to filter
obnoxious morons like you out, also many don't have the capability to
do so.

Start behaving like a responsible adult and filter yourself by posting
your nonsense in the appropriate newsgroups.


Dear dxacer

As far as I can see, he IS posting it in the appropriate groups.
rec.radio.shortwave I belonged to many years ago and it was about as useful
as tits on a boarhog. He is posting to alt.politics.republcans. And so
are you. Physician heal thyself.

Sir Charles the Curmudgeon

Bob Campbell wrote:
wrote in message
...
Read some history. I can give you a good reading list to see the truth
about the criminal incompetence of Bush.

Being incompetent is not a crime. If it was, then 75% of politicians,
school teachers and telephone "product support" people would be in jail.

Caustic indifference and mean-spiritedness do not equal incompetence.

On Nov 23, 7:51*am, wrote:
§tarkiller© *writes:

* *§tarkiller© On 21 Nov 2008 17:51:06 -0500, wrote:
* * David Hartung writes:
* *
* *David SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote:
* * now this is funny, bush has completely destroyed the constitution,
* * greed is rampant, bush singlehandedly destroyed the u.s. economy,
* * and you're scared of the demcorats?
* * you should be scared of the dumbass nazi neocon republican scum
* * save america, kill a neocon today
* *
* *David If you will look around you, you will realize that your claim is
* *David completely without merit.
* *
* *David Bush has destroyed nothing.
* *
* * He has come very close to destroying Iraq.
* * By complete incompetence.

* *§tarkiller© Yeah yeah sure sure, guess that's why so many less people are dying in
* *§tarkiller© Iraq today than did under your hero Saddam yes?

Far more people die today than under Saddam. *What could have
possibly made you think otherwise?

Iraq is in the control of political parties created in Iran, and
allied with Iran.

Recently we made allies with unreformed Baathists in the Sunni *areas,
and have armed them. *Now there are three Iraqi armies in Iraq --- the
Peshmurga (Kurds), the offical Iraqi Army (Shiite and allied with Iran),

- and the new Sunni awakening army.

"Sunni Awakening Army" sort of sounds like :
Born Again Christians and Onward Christian Soldiers
all rolled into one.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/spl...nic_map416.gif

- When we leave, these three armies
- will have a full scale war.

Note - Iraq was a Post Colonial* 'manufactured
Nation designed to fail.
* First the Ottomans and then the British

Then Turkey will move in from the North
and Iran will move in from the East.
http://gulf2000.columbia.edu/images/...ligions_sm.jpg

* *§tarkiller© Guess that's also why the Iraq oil business is booming raking in
* *§tarkiller© billions to Iraq.

Billions to the pro-Iranian Shiite parties.

* *§tarkiller© Guess that's also why we see so few reports of fighting and deaths
* *§tarkiller© these days compares to just a couple of years ago as well yes?

There is a short term reduction in violence, and the Baathists have pretty
much expelled al Queda. *But the nation is ruined.

* * He has destroyed our prestige in the world.

* *§tarkiller© No, people like Soros, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and few choice
* *§tarkiller© others traveling all over the world badmouthing the US to foreign
* *§tarkiller© nations did a lot of that, along with liberals like yoursel that

No, it was Bush arrogance and incompetence that did it.

Very sad.

* *§tarkiller© started screaming how horrible the US was even before Bush took office
* *
* * He is really one of the worst presidents of
* * all time.

* *§tarkiller© Another youngster not old enough to have experienced the Carter
* *§tarkiller© administration no doubt.

You are not a good mind reader. *Carter's ineptness pales next to Bush's.

* *§tarkiller© Not to worry though. *It is likely you may see another Carteresque
* *§tarkiller© presidency shortly.

Perhaps, but it is hard to imagine it could be worse that Bush.

Read some history. *I can give you a good reading list to see the truth
about the criminal incompetence of Bush. *

* *§tarkiller© Regards

* *§tarkiller© §tarkiller©

* *§tarkiller© 'A government big enough to give you everything you want, is
* *§tarkiller© big enough to take away everything you have.'

* *§tarkiller© "You cannot enrich the poor by impoverishing the rich."

--
Andrew Hall
(Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)

wrote:


§tarkiller© Another youngster not old enough to have experienced the Carter
§tarkiller© administration no doubt.

You are not a good mind reader. Carter's ineptness pales next to Bush's.

§tarkiller© Not to worry though. It is likely you may see another Carteresque
§tarkiller© presidency shortly.

Perhaps, but it is hard to imagine it could be worse that Bush.

Read some history. I can give you a good reading list to see the truth
about the criminal incompetence of Bush.

Contrary to the Reaganite Revisionist version of history, it was Jimmy
Carter who maneuvered the Soviets into a prolonged war in Afghanistan.
(Reagan was the one who let Osama go the Dark Side.)

Dave wrote:
wrote:


§tarkiller© Another youngster not old enough to have experienced
the Carter
§tarkiller© administration no doubt.

You are not a good mind reader. Carter's ineptness pales next to Bush's.

§tarkiller© Not to worry though. It is likely you may see another
Carteresque
§tarkiller© presidency shortly.

Perhaps, but it is hard to imagine it could be worse that Bush.

Read some history. I can give you a good reading list to see the truth
about the criminal incompetence of Bush.
Contrary to the Reaganite Revisionist version of history, it was Jimmy
Carter who maneuvered the Soviets into a prolonged war in Afghanistan.
(Reagan was the one who let Osama go the Dark Side.)

Your source for this theory?