Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 17, 6:35*pm, RHF wrote:
* Shortwave Radio Reception Codes * * S I N P O * * S I O Good advice. I'll add from what I have read and understood stations prefer to have "plain english" for the quality of their broadcast rather than SINPO or SIO codes An example is, reception at 99999khz was good at xxxx-utc but fading at times with some splashover from 99995khz (rather than a simple 222 or 23232 code). Signal became worse at xxxx-utc. Your other broadcast on 99960khz was excellent with no fading, distortion, or interference during the same time period. I was using a Radio Shack Dx-999 using 60 foot of random wire facing from Southwest to Northeast. Then give details of the program. (frequency and radio fictional) I get the impression they want as much detail as possible. That gives them so more information than numbers which are subject to interpretation. RCI was very appreciate that I gave a reception report in plain English, they mailed me a very nice packet today via US mail. Cheers |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|