Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old December 19th 08, 07:39 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 317
Default 860 AM

On Dec 18, 2:30*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"BCBlazysusan" wrote in message

...
On Dec 18, 4:40 am, dxAce wrote:

Whoa! When mentioning QSL, one must always add (verie, for those in
Glendale)!


It also might be a good idea to do this when mentioning QTH (location, for
those
in Glendale) as well.


OK - when you say "verie" that means? I always thought that what I
sent to stations was called a verification report and then they in
turn send a qsl card or letter. Correct? No? FWIW my location is
Cincinnati,Oh.

Among MW DXers, one sends a reception report and receives a verification or
confirmation of reception from the station.

Station staffs seldom know the "Q" codes, and most would have no idea what a
"QSL" card is. Since most stations have contract engineers, not staff
engineers, its likely that a verification would come from someone in the
office... the manager, PD, office manager, etc., and they probably don't
know much about DXing in general... including the term "DXing."

Among themselves, AM DXers have called any confirmation of reception a
"verie" for the last 60 or 70 years. But at the station level, this term is
as unknown as QSL or QTH or DX.

For these reasons, reporting to anything except the big 50 kw clear channel
stations should use lay terms to the tone of "I heard your station... here
is what I heard... If this is correct, I'd value a verification from you
that I indeed heard your station."

From where I sit, our local AM, a 50 kw fulltime facility, only gets maybe 2
to 3 reception reports a year. Because our DOE is a ham, he knows what to do
with them. But many stations are not familiar with AM DXing any more. In
fact, some think that distant reception shows them operating outside
licensed values, and reports frighten them!


Glendale. Those Armenians know how to cook, especially BBQ.
  #12   Report Post  
Old December 19th 08, 09:39 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default 860 AM

On Dec 18, 11:39*pm, wrote:
On Dec 18, 2:30*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:



"BCBlazysusan" wrote in message


....
On Dec 18, 4:40 am, dxAce wrote:


Whoa! When mentioning QSL, one must always add (verie, for those in
Glendale)!


It also might be a good idea to do this when mentioning QTH (location, for
those
in Glendale) as well.


OK - when you say "verie" that means? I always thought that what I
sent to stations was called a verification report and then they in
turn send a qsl card or letter. Correct? No? FWIW my location is
Cincinnati,Oh.


Among MW DXers, one sends a reception report and receives a verification or
confirmation of reception from the station.


Station staffs seldom know the "Q" codes, and most would have no idea what a
"QSL" card is. Since most stations have contract engineers, not staff
engineers, its likely that a verification would come from someone in the
office... the manager, PD, office manager, etc., and they probably don't
know much about DXing in general... including the term "DXing."


Among themselves, AM DXers have called any confirmation of reception a
"verie" for the last 60 or 70 years. But at the station level, this term is
as unknown as QSL or QTH or DX.


For these reasons, reporting to anything except the big 50 kw clear channel
stations should use lay terms to the tone of "I heard your station... here
is what I heard... If this is correct, I'd value a verification from you
that I indeed heard your station."


From where I sit, our local AM, a 50 kw fulltime facility, only gets maybe 2
to 3 reception reports a year. Because our DOE is a ham, he knows what to do
with them. But many stations are not familiar with AM DXing any more. In
fact, some think that distant reception shows them operating outside
licensed values, and reports frighten them!


- Glendale. Those Armenians know how to cook, especially BBQ.

Some people in Texas and the South West
might beg to differ with you . . .

There 'be' Bar-B-Que and The 'Be' BBQ ;-P
  #13   Report Post  
Old December 19th 08, 02:08 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,183
Default 860 AM

RHF wrote:
On Dec 18, 11:39 pm, wrote:



- Glendale. Those Armenians know how to cook, especially BBQ.

Some people in Texas and the South West
might beg to differ with you . . .

There 'be' Bar-B-Que and The 'Be' BBQ ;-P
.

Glendale, CA is in the Southwest.
  #14   Report Post  
Old December 21st 08, 08:44 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default (OT) : PONG Dave - Glendale, CA Ain't . . .

On Dec 19, 6:08*am, Dave wrote:
RHF wrote:
On Dec 18, 11:39 pm, wrote:


- Glendale. Those Armenians know how to cook, especially BBQ.


Some people in Texas and the South West
might beg to differ with you . . .


There 'be' Bar-B-Que and The 'Be' BBQ ;-P
*.


- Glendale, CA is in the Southwest.

Dave,
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017