Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #181   Report Post  
Old January 2nd 09, 02:45 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,494
Default Antenna for shortwave reception

In article ,
John Smith wrote:

Dave wrote:

...
The IMD is way worse than the Minicircuits device Telemon referenced.


Telemondo is plonked, here ... :-)


You still read my posts.

And, would be similar to the device I referenced:

http://www.sirenza.com/documents/pro..._Datasheet.pdf

There is a diagram, on the above sheet, which shows it mounted on an
evaluation board ...


Why are you using a silicon/germanium RF transistor rated to 5 GHz for
HF? A little overkill there don't you think?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
  #182   Report Post  
Old January 2nd 09, 01:43 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,183
Default Antenna for shortwave reception

John Smith wrote:
flashdrive wrote:

...
I referenced the Minicircuits MMIC. I think the specs look pretty good
for a MW/HF loop pre-amp. I wonder if Wellbrook uses a MMIC?


I doubt it. I would think their bottom line would be cost and they
would be using the cheapest components available ...

Regards,
JS


Wellbrook doesn't give off that kind of vibe.
  #183   Report Post  
Old January 2nd 09, 01:47 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,183
Default Antenna for shortwave reception

John Smith wrote:
Dave wrote:

...
I use these for UHF receiver boosting.

http://www.minicircuits.com/pdfs/HELA-10.pdf


I don't have any need for balanced input/output, nor the cost of
interfacing, the between-lead spacing of .022 in. is out of the
questing, too easy to bridge between pins ... IMHO.

Regards,
JS


I gave you two versions of the same preceison amp, in answer to your
example of a mediocre amp. If the leads are too close together get the
unit in a case, with 50 Ohms in and out.

Telemon is right though, the original thread was about HF, and the 3
term device that the other guys referenced, or even the 3 term device
Ten-Tec used 8 years ago, are superior to your little 40 mW MMIC.
  #184   Report Post  
Old January 3rd 09, 12:37 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default Active 3-30 MHz "Hula-Loop" Antenna for Shortwave

On Jan 1, 5:41*pm, flashdrive wrote:
Dave wrote:
John Smith wrote:


John Smith wrote:


...
How about this:


http://cgi.ebay.com/Sirenza-SGA-4586...of-10-RF-Ampli....


(take care with line wrapping of the URL, above)


10 for $10.00 plus $2.50 USD -- comes to $1.25 a piece, and provides
for a fatal error in construction/use.


They are a bit small, sharpen your soldering iron, but should be
easily "do-able."


Regards,
JS


Soldering the device(s) would be similar to this:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAADF...eature=related


Regards,
JS


The IMD is way worse than the Minicircuits device Telemon referenced.


- I referenced the Minicircuits MMIC.
- I think the specs look pretty good for a MW/HF loop pre-amp.
- I wonder if Wellbrook uses a MMIC?

Why bother with Wellbrook ?

Active 3-30 MHz "Hula-Loop" Antenna for Shortwave
http://www.techlib.com/electronics/antennas.html
The "Loopifier" ! [Loop-I-Fier] -by- Charles Wenzel
Copyright 1995 & Updated 2000

iane ~ RHF
  #185   Report Post  
Old January 3rd 09, 12:51 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,915
Default Active 3-30 MHz "Hula-Loop" Antenna for Shortwave

RHF wrote:

...
Active 3-30 MHz "Hula-Loop" Antenna for Shortwave
http://www.techlib.com/electronics/antennas.html
The "Loopifier" ! [Loop-I-Fier] -by- Charles Wenzel
Copyright 1995 & Updated 2000

iane ~ RHF
.


His construction of the loop looks workable, feed its' output to a MMIC,
to simplify parts/construction, and you are good to go ...

Regards,
JS


  #186   Report Post  
Old January 3rd 09, 12:53 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default Coax Loop & Active Loop & Mini-Whip Antennas for Shortwave RadioListening (SWL)

On Jan 2, 4:37*pm, RHF wrote:
On Jan 1, 5:41*pm, flashdrive wrote:

Dave wrote:
John Smith wrote:


John Smith wrote:


...
How about this:


http://cgi.ebay.com/Sirenza-SGA-4586...of-10-RF-Ampli...


(take care with line wrapping of the URL, above)


10 for $10.00 plus $2.50 USD -- comes to $1.25 a piece, and provides
for a fatal error in construction/use.


They are a bit small, sharpen your soldering iron, but should be
easily "do-able."


Regards,
JS


Soldering the device(s) would be similar to this:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAADF...eature=related


Regards,
JS


The IMD is way worse than the Minicircuits device Telemon referenced.


- I referenced the Minicircuits MMIC.
- I think the specs look pretty good for a MW/HF loop pre-amp.

- - I wonder if Wellbrook uses a MMIC?

- Why bother with Wellbrook ?
-
- Active 3-30 MHz "Hula-Loop" Antenna for Shortwave
- http://www.techlib.com/electronics/antennas.html
- The "Loopifier" ! [Loop-I-Fier] -by- Charles Wenzel
- Copyright 1995 & Updated 2000
-
- iane ~ RHF
- *.

Magnetna Loop Antena
http://users.triera.net/zupanbra/drm/antena.html
{Passive Coax Cable 'Magnetic" Tuned Loop Antenna}

Aktivna Antena za DRM
http://users.triera.net/zupanbra/drm/antena.html
{Active Broadband Loop Antenna for DRM}

PA0RDT Mini-Whip Antenna
http://users.triera.net/zupanbra/drm/antena.html
http://users.triera.net/zupanbra/pdf/mini-whip_SCH.pdf
http://users.triera.net/zupanbra/pdf/miniwhip_TIV.pdf

shortwave radio reception starts with
your antenna - iane ~ RHF {pomkia}
  #187   Report Post  
Old January 3rd 09, 02:20 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,183
Default Antenna for shortwave reception

John Smith wrote:
Dave wrote:

...
Wellbrook doesn't give off that kind of vibe.


What kind of "vibes" are you getting from your
Ouji-Board/psychic-abilities about Obama?

Inquiring minds wanna know, ya' know? ;-)

Regards,
JS


He's normal.
  #188   Report Post  
Old January 3rd 09, 02:25 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,183
Default Antenna for shortwave reception

John Smith wrote:
Dave wrote:

...
I gave you two versions of the same preceison amp, in answer to your
example of a mediocre amp. If the leads are too close together get
the unit in a case, with 50 Ohms in and out.

Telemon is right though, the original thread was about HF, and the 3
term device that the other guys referenced, or even the 3 term device
Ten-Tec used 8 years ago, are superior to your little 40 mW MMIC.


I think the device I gave is easily available and cheap, large enough to
easily solder, etc., and not only that, but it would more than
suffice--I'd say that was nothing short of excellent, acceptable noise
figure also. Me thinks you look for a problem to satisfy more than
actual needs and fitness for duty--your ego possibly?

I just don't see Ghz capabilities being a problem, so why you would
think only requiring HF capabilities from it is any sort of a problem.
Indeed, with switchable filters in front of it, you could use it to scan
for wifi points ...

I suppose I could spend anything I wanted, a $1.25 per unit sounds good
to me ...

Regards,
JS


I deal with multiple carriers in the passband and I have to see an IP3
at least in the upper 30s.
  #189   Report Post  
Old January 3rd 09, 10:55 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,183
Default Antenna for shortwave reception

John Smith wrote:
Dave wrote:

...
I deal with multiple carriers in the passband and I have to see an IP3
at least in the upper 30s.


Without a doubt, for any possible solution(s) a person(s) could come up
with--a special case(s) could be found to negate fitness for purpose ...

Any good college debate class will quickly teach someone that point--the
first day of class!

Regards,
JS


???
  #190   Report Post  
Old January 4th 09, 01:53 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default Antenna for shortwave reception

On Jan 3, 11:41*am, John Smith wrote:
Dave wrote:
...
I deal with multiple carriers in the passband and I have to see an IP3
at least in the upper 30s.


Without a doubt, for any possible solution(s) a person(s) could come up
with--a special case(s) could be found to negate fitness for purpose ...


- Any good college debate class will quickly teach
- someone that point--the first day of class!
-
- Regards,
- JS

JS,

Sounds like you are a pretty good 'debater' yourself.

maybe you studied under mwb ? ;-} ~ RHF
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Antenna for shortwave reception PJ[_4_] Antenna 113 January 1st 09 06:24 PM
Should a shortwave loop antenna, hung outside, also improve FM reception? dead of night Shortwave 0 January 23rd 07 12:05 AM
The "Green" Antenna for AM/MW Radio Reception plus Shortwave Too ! RHF Shortwave 0 January 10th 07 01:21 PM
Sangean ATS-505 Receiver - Improving your Shortwave Radio Reception with an External Shortwave Listener's (SWL) Antenna RHF Shortwave 0 January 16th 06 09:12 PM
shortwave reception.. with Grundig YB 400 PE David Mills Shortwave 4 May 18th 04 06:58 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017