Are hams terrorists?
 

In

radioguy wrote:

What is it with ham radio that seems to attract all of the self-
appointed radio cops???

CB doesn't seem to attract them.

Then perhaps you should stay on CB.

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN

Are hams terrorists?
 

On Jan 15, 5:50�pm, "SC Dxing" wrote:
wrote in message

...

Who, but in hell is going to name their kid "Lucifer" or even
Ramakrishna Lakshminaramayanan.

Someone named their kid Adolf Hitler and it was all over the news.

The only place you can find this bogus story is on Usenet.

Oh, not just usenet. What's funny is so many people have responded to the
false story, including yourself and now sad to say, myself. We both just
rewarded the poster by responding to it.

Not necessary, I did not respond to the story, I responded to
Radioguy's post, reporting a blatant troll story.

73 DL

Are hams terrorists?
 

On Jan 15, 5:37�pm, radioguy wrote:
On Jan 15, 5:12�pm, wrote:





On Jan 15, 6:40 am, radioguy wrote:

Take a look at the excuses the U.S. feds gave.

I don't know if all of these people really were terrorists or not as
the feds claim, however looking at the reasons the feds gave, I don't
see any way of any legittimate ham radio operator getting out of being
accused and arrested and ruled definitely a terrorist even if you are
a legitimate law-abiding ham. You won't be able to prove you're
innocent.

http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:...oups.derkeiler...

The same might eventually be said for cbers also. Along with frs.gmrs
users, eventually.

You are a troll and so is the story.. you guys took this crap hook
line and sinker..

This story is bogus, look at the names in the story..."Lucifer
Barrientos"

Who, but in hell is going to name their kid "Lucifer" or even
Ramakrishna Lakshminaramayanan. �Google William Roberts and terroist,
not one hit, nothing, nada.

The only place you can find this bogus story is on Usenet.

DL

Actually, there are some Doctor Who books written by a guy whose �last
name really is Lucifer.

Lofficer is French for Lucifer.

Yes the story is bogus. I did not notice the date on it until
afterwards.

However it was very plausible since in the past,I have actually
experienced similar catch-22 �situations by certain self-appointed
cops who turned out to be hams.

What is it with ham radio that seems to attract all of the self-
appointed radio cops???

Not sure, never ran into these folks, but I have heard of them.
Mostly OO's hanging out on 75 waiting to pounce.

CB doesn't seem to attract them.

CB doesn't seem to attract anything around here but three types, drive
time users, truckers, and professional CB'er's with their big amps,
echo mics, roger beeps, noise toys, etc etc etc, so they can ride
around in their vehicles yelling, "NO NAME NO NAME NO NAME", or
"SQUISH SQUISH SQUSIH", or "CB FAGGOT CB FAGGOT CB FAGGOT" or "DAVE
MADE DAVE MADE DAVE MADE", or varibles of such. Quite amusing for
about 10 seconds listening tor grown men acting like a bunch of
morons.

Which is why we call it, at least around my parts, the Children's Band
Radio.

This isn't anything against all hams

This isn't anything aganst all CB users

It's just a certain few that seem to give all hams a bad name.

Ditto

Come to think of it, it's not jst hams. GMRS seems to attract them
also.

It seems like radio services requiring a radio license attracts all of
the self-appointed radio cops.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

73, DL

Are hams terrorists?
 

On Jan 15, 7:19*am, Dave wrote:
radioguy wrote:
Take a look at the excuses the U.S. feds gave.

I don't know if all of these people really were terrorists or not as
the feds claim, however looking at the reasons the feds gave, I don't
see any way of any legittimate ham radio operator getting out of being
accused and arrested and ruled definitely *a terrorist even if you are
a legitimate law-abiding ham. You won't be able to prove you're
innocent.

http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:...oups.derkeiler....

The same might eventually be said for cbers also. Along with frs.gmrs
users, eventually.

That doesn't help.- Hide quoted text -


At least your "free", Dr.DaviD - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4YbZ7iXFDA

Are hams terrorists?
 

On Jan 15, 2:12*pm, wrote:
On Jan 15, 6:40 am, radioguy wrote:

Take a look at the excuses the U.S. feds gave.

I don't know if all of these people really were terrorists or not as
the feds claim, however looking at the reasons the feds gave, I don't
see any way of any legittimate ham radio operator getting out of being
accused and arrested and ruled definitely a terrorist even if you are
a legitimate law-abiding ham. You won't be able to prove you're
innocent.

http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:...oups.derkeiler....

The same might eventually be said for cbers also. Along with frs.gmrs
users, eventually.

You are a troll and so is the story.. you guys took this crap hook
line and sinker..

This story is bogus, look at the names in the story..."Lucifer
Barrientos"

Who, but in hell is going to name their kid "Lucifer" or even
Ramakrishna Lakshminaramayanan. *Google William Roberts and terroist,
not one hit, nothing, nada.

The only place you can find this bogus story is on Usenet.

DL

Yeah TSA and William Roberts does show
very few results; but there are no results that
show the article to be a fraud either. ~ RHF

Are hams terrorists?
 

On Jan 15, 4:00*pm, wrote:
On Jan 15, 5:37 pm, radioguy wrote:

On Jan 15, 5:12 pm, wrote:

On Jan 15, 6:40 am, radioguy wrote:

Take a look at the excuses the U.S. feds gave.

I don't know if all of these people really were terrorists or not as
the feds claim, however looking at the reasons the feds gave, I don't
see any way of any legittimate ham radio operator getting out of being
accused and arrested and ruled definitely a terrorist even if you are
a legitimate law-abiding ham. You won't be able to prove you're
innocent.

http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:...oups.derkeiler...

The same might eventually be said for cbers also. Along with frs.gmrs
users, eventually.

You are a troll and so is the story.. you guys took this crap hook
line and sinker..

This story is bogus, look at the names in the story..."Lucifer
Barrientos"

Who, but in hell is going to name their kid "Lucifer" or even
Ramakrishna Lakshminaramayanan. Google William Roberts and terroist,
not one hit, nothing, nada.

The only place you can find this bogus story is on Usenet.

DL

Actually, there are some Doctor Who books written by a guy whose last
name really is Lucifer.

Lofficer is French for Lucifer.

Yes the story is bogus. I did not notice the date on it until
afterwards.

However it was very plausible since in the past,I have actually
experienced similar catch-22 situations by certain self-appointed
cops who turned out to be hams.

What is it with ham radio that seems to attract all of the self-
appointed radio cops???

Not sure, never ran into these folks, but I have heard of them.
Mostly OO's hanging out on 75 waiting to pounce.

CB doesn't seem to attract them.

CB doesn't seem to attract anything around here but three types, drive
time users, truckers, and professional CB'er's with their big amps,
echo mics, roger beeps, noise toys, etc etc etc, so they can ride
around in their vehicles yelling, "NO NAME NO NAME NO NAME", or
"SQUISH SQUISH SQUSIH", or "CB FAGGOT CB FAGGOT CB FAGGOT" or "DAVE
MADE DAVE MADE DAVE MADE", or varibles of such. *Quite amusing for
about 10 seconds listening tor grown men acting like a bunch of
morons.

Which is why we call it, at least around my parts, the Children's Band
Radio.

This isn't anything against all hams

This isn't anything aganst all CB users

It's just a certain few that seem to give all hams a bad name.

Ditto

Come to think of it, it's not jst hams. GMRS seems to attract them
also.

It seems like radio services requiring a radio license attracts all of
the self-appointed radio cops.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

73, DL

Roger Beep That ! ;-} ~ RHF

Are hams terrorists?
 

On Jan 15, 3:51*pm, wrote:
On Jan 15, 5:50 pm, "SC Dxing" wrote:

wrote in message

....

Who, but in hell is going to name their kid "Lucifer" or even
Ramakrishna Lakshminaramayanan.

Someone named their kid Adolf Hitler and it was all over the news.

The only place you can find this bogus story is on Usenet.

Oh, not just usenet. What's funny is so many people have responded to the
false story, including yourself and now sad to say, myself. We both just
rewarded the poster by responding to it.

- Not necessary, I did not respond to the story,
- I responded to Radioguy's post,
- reporting a blatant troll story.
-
- 73 DL

"Troll Story" - war and peace on the internet ~ RHF

Are hams terrorists?
 

On Jan 16, 10:27*am, RHF wrote:
On Jan 15, 3:51*pm, wrote:

On Jan 15, 5:50 pm, "SC Dxing" wrote:

wrote in message

....

Who, but in hell is going to name their kid "Lucifer" or even
Ramakrishna Lakshminaramayanan.

Someone named their kid Adolf Hitler and it was all over the news.

The only place you can find this bogus story is on Usenet.

Oh, not just usenet. What's funny is so many people have responded to the
false story, including yourself and now sad to say, myself. We both just
rewarded the poster by responding to it.

- Not necessary, I did not respond to the story,
- I responded to Radioguy's post,
- reporting a blatant troll story.
-
- 73 DL

"Troll Story" - war and peace on the internet ~ RHF
*.

Gee, the date on that story was April 1, 2008. Could that be a clue?

Are hams terrorists?
 

radioguy wrote:

Actually, there are some Doctor Who books written by a guy whose last
name really is Lucifer.

Lofficer is French for Lucifer.

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/lucere

Are hams terrorists?
 

In message
,
VR2HF K7DAN writes
On Jan 16, 10:27*am, RHF wrote:
On Jan 15, 3:51*pm, wrote:

On Jan 15, 5:50 pm, "SC Dxing" wrote:

wrote in message

...

Who, but in hell is going to name their kid "Lucifer" or even
Ramakrishna Lakshminaramayanan.

Someone named their kid Adolf Hitler and it was all over the news.

The only place you can find this bogus story is on Usenet.

Oh, not just usenet. What's funny is so many people have responded to the
false story, including yourself and now sad to say, myself. We both just
rewarded the poster by responding to it.

- Not necessary, I did not respond to the story,
- I responded to Radioguy's post,
- reporting a blatant troll story.
-
- 73 DL

"Troll Story" - war and peace on the internet ~ RHF
*.

Gee, the date on that story was April 1, 2008. Could that be a clue?

I'm sure that everyone DID realise what the date was, and were simply
going along with the joke to see how many more of the gullible could be
drawn in before the myth imploded. However, these days, you can never
REALLY be sure that these things aren't in fact true.
--
Ian