Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What, me Work? ~ Maynard G. Krebs, old Dobie Gillis tv series I used to
watch on Radio tb back in the 1950s. Somebody would mention Work.Maynard would fall over backwards in his chair. cuhulin |
#82
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ha, you are funny! I have quit the booze.I don't wee wee on doggy's
couch anymore. cuhulin |
#83
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
dave wrote: Telamon wrote: No you have not thought it through. If you did you would come up with a list of positive and negative outcomes. You would have to look at these lists and determine the benefits and costs. You would then pick a course of action based on short and long term benefits versus costs. You have not done this or thought it through and just gave a distracting answer. Good luck to you on that. Like I said, I was in Houston for a Category 3 Hurricane. The splices are still on the wires, from where the un-maintained trees shredded them. They have since been very proactive regarding preventative maintenance of right-of-way encroachment. Which has naught to do with the question of overhead VS underground power lines. Now answer the question you originally posed. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#84
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telamon wrote:
Which has naught to do with the question of overhead VS underground power lines. Now answer the question you originally posed. I said you either bury the power lines or trim the trees. Doing nothing because it may be a long time before there's a storm is gambling with people's lives. We used to be better than that. We are a mediocre second-rate ******** country nowadays. |
#85
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
dave wrote: Telamon wrote: Which has naught to do with the question of overhead VS underground power lines. Now answer the question you originally posed. I said you either bury the power lines or trim the trees. Doing nothing because it may be a long time before there's a storm is gambling with people's lives. We used to be better than that. We are a mediocre second-rate ******** country nowadays. OK so you refuse to look at the cost/benefit analysis of overhead lines verses underground and just want to baselessly argue the point that underground is a wiser decision. I just wanted to understand your point. Apparently you want to do the same thing for the amount of tree trimming that "should" be done. You should be on the obomination team dictating how we all should be living our lives as I'm sure you could do a better job than any of us are doing. I don't know about you but I'm wondering when my Federal and state of Cale-forn-na tax refund checks will show up. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#86
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telamon wrote:
OK so you refuse to look at the cost/benefit analysis of overhead lines verses underground and just want to baselessly argue the point that underground is a wiser decision. I just wanted to understand your point. Apparently you want to do the same thing for the amount of tree trimming that "should" be done. You should be on the obomination team dictating how we all should be living our lives as I'm sure you could do a better job than any of us are doing. I don't know about you but I'm wondering when my Federal and state of Cale-forn-na tax refund checks will show up. Cost/benefit analysis is no way to deal with people's essential services. That is a slippery slope that invariably ends with people dying. I am neutral on Mr. Obama, but I have seen nothing indicating that he plans to tell anyone how to live. It is quite a stretch to equate me stating that disasters are made worse by inaction, to a desire to micromanage strangers' lives. People who overpay their taxes all year and then get refunds are morons. I will cut the state a check, like I do every year. Do you enjoy loaning money (interest free) to your hero Arnold? |
#87
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dave" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: Trees don't grow on their "plant." They grow along the right of way. Utilities have trimming programs, but if they trimmed to the degree needed in a major storm, entire cities would protest. You can't prepare for everything. Why would they protest? The degree of trimming needed to protect against every contingency would leave little more than the trunk. Not trimming trees around power lines is false economy. It will cost more in the long run. No, preventing once in a lifetime occurrences every year is always more expensive. |
#88
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Eduardo wrote:
"dave" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: Trees don't grow on their "plant." They grow along the right of way. Utilities have trimming programs, but if they trimmed to the degree needed in a major storm, entire cities would protest. You can't prepare for everything. Why would they protest? The degree of trimming needed to protect against every contingency would leave little more than the trunk. Not trimming trees around power lines is false economy. It will cost more in the long run. No, preventing once in a lifetime occurrences every year is always more expensive. How many people freezing to death is acceptable in your twisted world? |
#89
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Eduardo wrote:
No, preventing once in a lifetime occurrences every year is always more expensive. And freezing rain happens every winter. |
#90
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
dave wrote: Telamon wrote: OK so you refuse to look at the cost/benefit analysis of overhead lines verses underground and just want to baselessly argue the point that underground is a wiser decision. I just wanted to understand your point. Apparently you want to do the same thing for the amount of tree trimming that "should" be done. You should be on the obomination team dictating how we all should be living our lives as I'm sure you could do a better job than any of us are doing. I don't know about you but I'm wondering when my Federal and state of Cale-forn-na tax refund checks will show up. Cost/benefit analysis is no way to deal with people's essential services. That is a slippery slope that invariably ends with people dying. Wow, that's quite a non-answer. Cost/benefit has nothing to do with people dying or not, it has to do with the best use of money and effort. I am neutral on Mr. Obama, but I have seen nothing indicating that he plans to tell anyone how to live. It is quite a stretch to equate me stating that disasters are made worse by inaction, to a desire to micromanage strangers' lives. The obominanator is willing to have government manage your life to the extent he can make it possible. People who overpay their taxes all year and then get refunds are morons. I will cut the state a check, like I do every year. Do you enjoy loaning money (interest free) to your hero Arnold? If you cut a check every year and you are more than 10% off you will be paying another assessment. I try to have my tax deductions keep pace with my obligations but things change throughout the year. My tax guy was worth way more than his fee this year. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|