MNMikeW wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
dave wrote:

ka6uup wrote:

³The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC "are incorrect because
they only are based on mathematical models and presented results at
scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity.² -
Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of
This is false. The models include long-term variations in solar
output and orbit.
Baloney, this is in the money. The UN panel are a bunch of unmitigated
twits.

This, unfortunately, is not false:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmen...sions-oceans-c
openhagen
More BS. This is not science but alarmism. Congratulations on being
suckered one more time.

Realistic models do not support man made global warming period. Al Gore
is the biggest moron on the face of the earth.

You get an F in science.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/629/629/7074601.stm
This is BS. It is not factual. This is no different than the Al Gore
temperature / CO chart where he misleads the audience about cause and
effect. The IPCC is in the business of selling Kool-Aid to further the
UN global power agenda.

This is all such nonsense. We are actually headed toward global cooling
not warming.

There has been no warming for last 10 years yet CO levels continue to rise.
Oops.


10 years? That's silly. You cannot deduce a trend from 10 years of
data. Remove 1998 and then calculate. 1998 was an extra hot year, due
to ocean currents.

"dave" wrote in message
...
MNMikeW wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
dave wrote:

ka6uup wrote:

³The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC "are incorrect because
they only are based on mathematical models and presented results at
scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity.² -
Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of
This is false. The models include long-term variations in solar
output and orbit.
Baloney, this is in the money. The UN panel are a bunch of unmitigated
twits.

This, unfortunately, is not false:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmen...sions-oceans-c
openhagen
More BS. This is not science but alarmism. Congratulations on being
suckered one more time.

Realistic models do not support man made global warming period. Al
Gore
is the biggest moron on the face of the earth.

You get an F in science.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/629/629/7074601.stm
This is BS. It is not factual. This is no different than the Al Gore
temperature / CO chart where he misleads the audience about cause and
effect. The IPCC is in the business of selling Kool-Aid to further the
UN global power agenda.

This is all such nonsense. We are actually headed toward global cooling
not warming.

There has been no warming for last 10 years yet CO levels continue to
rise. Oops.
10 years? That's silly. You cannot deduce a trend from 10 years of data.
Remove 1998 and then calculate. 1998 was an extra hot year, due to ocean
currents.

You cannot deduce a trend from crappy computer models either.

To Obama and his cronies From The OathKeepers: What orders The US
Military will not obey
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=258556
cuhulin

wrote:
To Obama and his cronies From The OathKeepers: What orders The US
Military will not obey
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=258556
cuhulin


"So help me God" is not part of any official oath. It is traditionally
added by mouth breathers and other cowardly dullards.

Obama's Approval Reaches A New LOW
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=258558

How LOWWWWWWWW can he GO?
cuhulin

In article ,
dave wrote:

MNMikeW wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message
..
.
In article ,
dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
dave wrote:

ka6uup wrote:

³The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC "are incorrect because
they only are based on mathematical models and presented results at
scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity.² -
Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of
This is false. The models include long-term variations in solar
output and orbit.
Baloney, this is in the money. The UN panel are a bunch of unmitigated
twits.

This, unfortunately, is not false:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmen...missions-ocean
s-c
openhagen
More BS. This is not science but alarmism. Congratulations on being
suckered one more time.

Realistic models do not support man made global warming period. Al Gore
is the biggest moron on the face of the earth.

You get an F in science.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/629/629/7074601.stm
This is BS. It is not factual. This is no different than the Al Gore
temperature / CO chart where he misleads the audience about cause and
effect. The IPCC is in the business of selling Kool-Aid to further the
UN global power agenda.

This is all such nonsense. We are actually headed toward global cooling
not warming.

There has been no warming for last 10 years yet CO levels continue to rise.
Oops.


10 years? That's silly. You cannot deduce a trend from 10 years of
data. Remove 1998 and then calculate. 1998 was an extra hot year, due
to ocean currents.

It's not silly, he is right.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

MNMikeW wrote:

There has been no warming for last 10 years yet CO levels continue to rise.

Well, OK, no warming. If you say so...but then what would explain all
those glaciers and polar ice that is melting? Somebody used Photoshop
(tm) to doctor the hundreds of satellite and terrestrial pictures that
have been published over the last several years showing the melting? ALL
those pictures are fraudulent?

Also, I think you meant C02 (carbon dioxide), not CO (carbon monoxide).

In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

MNMikeW wrote:

There has been no warming for last 10 years yet CO levels continue to rise.

Well, OK, no warming. If you say so...but then what would explain all
those glaciers and polar ice that is melting? Somebody used Photoshop
(tm) to doctor the hundreds of satellite and terrestrial pictures that
have been published over the last several years showing the melting? ALL
those pictures are fraudulent?

Also, I think you meant C02 (carbon dioxide), not CO (carbon monoxide).

They melt every year in the summer time Billy. It's nothing new or
different. Can you guess what happens in the winter time? I'll bet you
can.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

MNMikeW wrote:
"dave" wrote in message
m...
Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

MNMikeW wrote:

There has been no warming for last 10 years yet CO levels continue to
rise.
Well, OK, no warming. If you say so...but then what would explain all
those glaciers and polar ice that is melting? Somebody used Photoshop
(tm) to doctor the hundreds of satellite and terrestrial pictures that
have been published over the last several years showing the melting? ALL
those pictures are fraudulent?

Also, I think you meant C02 (carbon dioxide), not CO (carbon monoxide).
They melt every year in the summer time Billy. It's nothing new or
different. Can you guess what happens in the winter time? I'll bet you
can.

I suggest you scroll down about half way. They have pictures.

http://nsidc.org/sotc/sea_ice.html


http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx



http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/faq.html#antarctic

MNMikeW wrote:

There has been no warming for last 10 years yet CO levels continue to rise.

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Well, OK, no warming. If you say so...but then what would explain all
those glaciers and polar ice that is melting? Somebody used Photoshop
(tm) to doctor the hundreds of satellite and terrestrial pictures that
have been published over the last several years showing the melting? ALL
those pictures are fraudulent?

Also, I think you meant C02 (carbon dioxide), not CO (carbon monoxide).

Telamon wrote:

They melt every year in the summer time Billy. It's nothing new or
different. Can you guess what happens in the winter time? I'll bet you
can.

Yes indeed, there are seasonal changes. Congratulations on your
intuitive grasp of...the obvious.

Unfortunately, if you had done even the tiniest bit of homework, you
would realize that there has been a huge loss of ice, glaciers pulled
back for -miles-, waaay more than can be accounted for by seasonal changes.

But, hey, that's OK. We here realize that you've never been one to let
facts get in your way.