In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Telamon wrote:

That reason could be that you are just plain lazy
or it could be you are to dull. Whatever the reason I suggest you apply
a little more personal effort on the topic instead of making the usual
ignorant post.

"to [sic] dull" and "ignorant post" and yet YOU are still totally
clueless about the use of "to" vs. "too".

Dammit, I've warned you about this befo If you are going to accuse
others of being dull and ignorant, fair enough, but it would behoove you
to get your own house in order first; otherwise you are demonstrating
YOUR dullness and ignorance.

Oh, the irony!! It's just to, too much. :-)

That's it from you? That's all you are capable of? Go correct english
papers then and get lost. What a loser.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

"Billy Burpelson" wrote in message
...
MNMikeW wrote:

http://www.businessandmedia.org/arti...506084437.aspx
Well now, there's a reliable source: the "Business and Media Institute"?
What kind of *scientific* organization is that? What scientific proof do
they offer other than saying "it ain't so"?

MNMikeW wrote:

Shoot the messenger when you have nothing. Typical lib.

Nothing to do with "shoot the messenger". Or lib. Or conservative.

It is a scientific topic and therefore a perfectly legitimate question
to ask what their scientific qualifications are.

How about shoot the idiot? Let's make holes in Billy boy.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

"Billy Burpelson" wrote in message
...
MNMikeW wrote:

There has been no warming for last 10 years yet CO levels continue to
rise.
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Well, OK, no warming. If you say so...but then what would explain all
those glaciers and polar ice that is melting? Somebody used Photoshop
(tm) to doctor the hundreds of satellite and terrestrial pictures that
have been published over the last several years showing the melting? ALL
those pictures are fraudulent?

Also, I think you meant C02 (carbon dioxide), not CO (carbon monoxide).
Telamon wrote:

They melt every year in the summer time Billy. It's nothing new or
different. Can you guess what happens in the winter time? I'll bet you
can.
Yes indeed, there are seasonal changes. Congratulations on your intuitive
grasp of...the obvious.

Unfortunately, if you had done even the tiniest bit of homework, you would
realize that there has been a huge loss of ice, glaciers pulled back
for -miles-, waaay more than can be accounted for by seasonal changes.

But, hey, that's OK. We here realize that you've never been one to let
facts get in your way.

MNMikeW wrote:

Sensor drift, google it.

Sensor drift, shmenser drift. What does that have do with the glaciers
that have receded for miles? You don't need any stinkin' sensors, just a
long tape measure... :-)

Sure thing Billy boy. You make all your decisions on bad data so who
cares? What receding glaciers are you talking about there Billy Boy?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
dave wrote:

MNMikeW wrote:


Sensor drift, google it.


Give it up. You are a tool of entrenched carbon industries.

Grow up.


I lived in Houston for 17 years, much of it as a news person. I know a
few things about how they operate on Louisiana Street.

"dave" wrote in message
...
MNMikeW wrote:



Sensor drift, google it.
Give it up. You are a tool of entrenched carbon industries.

Whereas you are just a tool.

"dave" wrote in message
...
Telamon wrote:
In article ,
dave wrote:

MNMikeW wrote:


Sensor drift, google it.

Give it up. You are a tool of entrenched carbon industries.

Grow up.


I lived in Houston for 17 years, much of it as a news person. I know a
few things about how they operate on Louisiana Street.

The prostitutes or the pimps?

MNMikeW wrote:
"dave" wrote in message
...
Telamon wrote:
In article ,
dave wrote:

MNMikeW wrote:

Sensor drift, google it.

Give it up. You are a tool of entrenched carbon industries.
Grow up.

I lived in Houston for 17 years, much of it as a news person. I know a
few things about how they operate on Louisiana Street.

The prostitutes or the pimps?


The GOBs

MNMikeW wrote:
"dave" wrote in message
...
MNMikeW wrote:


Sensor drift, google it.
Give it up. You are a tool of entrenched carbon industries.

Whereas you are just a tool.



Speaking of tools, I hope that you didn't donate to the Coleman campaign
using a credit card. Sorry SOB didn't let anyone know that their data
had been compromised. RIP - Coleman!

JB

John Barnard wrote:

MNMikeW wrote:
"dave" wrote in message
...
MNMikeW wrote:


Sensor drift, google it.
Give it up. You are a tool of entrenched carbon industries.

Whereas you are just a tool.



Speaking of tools, I hope that you didn't donate to the Coleman campaign
using a credit card. Sorry SOB didn't let anyone know that their data
had been compromised. RIP - Coleman!

Never listen to dumbass Canucks, no matter what dey say!

Da dxAce never done steer no one wrong!

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

MNMikeW wrote:

There has been no warming for last 10 years yet CO levels continue to
rise.
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Well, OK, no warming. If you say so...but then what would explain all
those glaciers and polar ice that is melting? Somebody used Photoshop
(tm) to doctor the hundreds of satellite and terrestrial pictures that
have been published over the last several years showing the melting? ALL
those pictures are fraudulent?

Also, I think you meant C02 (carbon dioxide), not CO (carbon monoxide).
Telamon wrote:

They melt every year in the summer time Billy. It's nothing new or
different. Can you guess what happens in the winter time? I'll bet you
can.
Yes indeed, there are seasonal changes. Congratulations on your
intuitive grasp of...the obvious.

I grew up on the east coast so I know about the seasons.

Unfortunately, if you had done even the tiniest bit of homework, you
would realize that there has been a huge loss of ice, glaciers pulled
back for -miles-, waaay more than can be accounted for by seasonal changes.

I have spent hours reading about this and you are buying the global
warming Kool-aid but hey I'm not surprised.

Selective reading, no doubt. You should not take so much pride in your
selection bias.



But, hey, that's OK. We here realize that you've never been one to let
facts get in your way.

Facts are data. Data by itself is useless. You have to understand what
you are looking at to draw conclusions.

In other words, you went on a data mining trip. GWB did that with Iraq
and he recanted later on. When can we expect your mea culpa?

You have not done this. Instead
you have allowed other people to draw conclusions for you because of
some personal reason. That reason could be that you are just plain lazy
or it could be you are to dull. Whatever the reason I suggest you apply
a little more personal effort on the topic instead of making the usual
ignorant post.


How goes your Obama BC conspiracy?

JB