In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Telamon wrote:

I would rather have us killing terrorists in Iraq than
have another 9/11 here.

Please explain your logic.

How could "us killing terrorists in Iraq" having anything whatsoever to
do with "another 9/11 here"?

SNIP

It is the difference between taking an offensive as opposed to defensive
posture. It's sort of along the same lines as the ice melting seasonal
thread.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Telamon wrote:

I would rather have us killing terrorists in Iraq than
have another 9/11 here.
Please explain your logic.

How could "us killing terrorists in Iraq" having anything whatsoever to
do with "another 9/11 here"?

SNIP

Telamon wrote:

It is the difference between taking an offensive as opposed to defensive
posture.

Humph! That is really a non-answer.

An "offensive posture" against what?

The "terrorists" in Iraq aren't really terrorists. They are either

a) Fighting against foreign occupiers (us), just like we would do with
occupiers here in our country.

or

b) Participants in the local tribal civil war.

As I stated previously (and snipped by you), -real- terrorists wanting
to pull another 9/11 don't need to be in Iraq and indeed, they would be
rather stupid to stay in Iraq where we could kill them.

As I stated previously (and snipped by you), -real- terrorists will/can
operate anywhere in the whole world.

So again, a non-answer dodge on your part -- but thanks for playing.

In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Telamon wrote:

I would rather have us killing terrorists in Iraq than
have another 9/11 here.
Please explain your logic.

How could "us killing terrorists in Iraq" having anything whatsoever to
do with "another 9/11 here"?

SNIP

Telamon wrote:

It is the difference between taking an offensive as opposed to defensive
posture.

Humph! That is really a non-answer.

It is the right answer.

An "offensive posture" against what?

Your ignorance is pretty offensive.

The "terrorists" in Iraq aren't really terrorists. They are either

a) Fighting against foreign occupiers (us), just like we would do with
occupiers here in our country.

or

b) Participants in the local tribal civil war.

As I stated previously (and snipped by you), -real- terrorists wanting
to pull another 9/11 don't need to be in Iraq and indeed, they would be
rather stupid to stay in Iraq where we could kill them.

As I stated previously (and snipped by you), -real- terrorists will/can
operate anywhere in the whole world.

So again, a non-answer dodge on your part -- but thanks for playing.

It not a dodge, it just just that you are incapable of comprehending.

And that's a personal problem of yours Billy.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California