Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , dave wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , We are putting missiles on Russia's doorstep. This is their response. SNIP They are not nuclear missiles Dave. They are conventional defense missiles. For which the effective countermeasure IS a nuclear weapon. The end result is the same; destabilization and menace. The nukes on the bombers are offensive weapons. There is no comparison to a conventional defensive missile. You are not making sense. These defensive missiles are designed to shoot down an ICBM. These handful of missiles could also stop ICBM's from Russia but they can only stop a few at best and Russia has thousands. Since this is the case why should Russia be concerned? It's not like a Russia nuclear response could be compromised in some way by them. It's posturing on the part of the Russians. There's no sense in placing nukes on a bomber when launching them from a sub. is way more advantageous. With your logic then there should be no bombers at all. The bombers are designed to carry nukes and the Russians are intent on flying them so you must be wrong about that. You can't think for yourself let alone anyone else but I do see that is a trait that you picked up from your daddy, RHF. I don't usually read RHF as his posts are a nightmare. My posts do not resemble his any more than yours do but you are headed in the direction of complete incomprehension. Bombers are the most vulnerable part of the triad. Do you really think that a slow as molasses Tu-54 is going to make it anywhere near the USA? This is Debatable. The bombers can carry cruise missiles that launch much faster than the subs can and they require us to look in another place besides the subs. Take put the airfield before the bombers can get up in the air and the bomber is as useless as you are on the best of days. If the bombers start making regular patrols that will not be the case. If they want to up the ante, see if they station alot more subs off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of the USA. The we'll talk. They have upped the ante with the bomber talk based near us to the south east and south. We used to have to look just west and north. This will put regular patrols off our other coasts. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Together Again: Cuba and Soviet Russia | Shortwave | |||
Trying to get Cuba | Shortwave | |||
Radio Habana Cuba (RHC) on 6.000 MHz in English from Cuba | Shortwave | |||
Russia/Ukraine: Voice of Russia signal partially jammed by local station | Broadcasting | |||
Cuba/USA: Cuba decries US radio, TV broadcasts to island | Broadcasting |