Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eduardo - The therapy is working! You're almost cured!
"What might have worked prior to the recession has lost any hope of success now; the potential of new models of receivers in an economy where people have all reduced discretionary spending is nil. AM HD is and was a dreadful idea, and the best way to discover this is to buy an HD car radio and listen. To say it is annoying is an understatement. I had a belief in HD on FM. But there are no radios anywhere at retail, and scant few on the web. What could have worked were the economy robust will be like AM stereo... too late to meet market needs. In a few years, stations will have developed robust new alternative delivery options, and HD won't be one of them. Like a relationship gone bad, it's hard to admit when something is over. I have pretty much decided that HD is not even worth the discussion time any more... with an exception being to hope that the 10 db increase in digital power on FM not be approved." |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 8, 12:52�am, wrote:
Eduardo - The therapy is working! �You're almost cured! "What might have worked prior to the recession has lost any hope of success now; the potential of new models of receivers in an economy where people have all reduced discretionary spending is nil. AM HD is and was a dreadful idea, and the best way to discover this is to buy an HD car radio and listen. To say it is annoying is an understatement. I had a belief in HD on FM. But there are no radios anywhere at retail, and scant few on the web. What could have worked were the economy robust will be like AM stereo... too late to meet market needs. In a few years, stations will have developed robust new alternative delivery options, and HD won't be one of them. Like a relationship gone bad, it's hard to admit when something is over. I have pretty much decided that HD is not even worth the discussion time any more... with an exception being to hope that the 10 db increase in digital power on FM not be approved." I do applaud Eduardo for finally telling the truth, after so many lies, but his credibility still remains almost zero. Interesting, what he said almost mirrored the article today from Inside Radio. Still, another article today from Radio World on Electric Programming Guides for HD Radio - what a total joke and complete waste of money. Just more things to complicate HD radios, and make them even more expensive. Makes one grateful for simple $10 analog radios like the Sony ICF-S10MK2. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 8, 12:52�am, wrote:
Eduardo - The therapy is working! �You're almost cured! "What might have worked prior to the recession has lost any hope of success now; the potential of new models of receivers in an economy where people have all reduced discretionary spending is nil. AM HD is and was a dreadful idea, and the best way to discover this is to buy an HD car radio and listen. To say it is annoying is an understatement. I had a belief in HD on FM. But there are no radios anywhere at retail, and scant few on the web. What could have worked were the economy robust will be like AM stereo... too late to meet market needs. In a few years, stations will have developed robust new alternative delivery options, and HD won't be one of them. Like a relationship gone bad, it's hard to admit when something is over. I have pretty much decided that HD is not even worth the discussion time any more... with an exception being to hope that the 10 db increase in digital power on FM not be approved." A show of hands for those who knew that the IBOC booters would blame HD Radio's failure on the recession - ME! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 07 May 2009 21:52:59 -0700, jimwilhelm wrote:
Eduardo - The therapy is working! You're almost cured! [snip] AM HD is and was a dreadful idea, and the best way to discover this is to buy an HD car radio and listen. To say it is annoying is an understatement. [snip] Is that the real David Eduardo? As I recall, he had been telling us how his HD car radio sounded "terrific". Frank Dresser |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 7, 9:52*pm, wrote:
Eduardo - The therapy is working! *You're almost cured! "What might have worked prior to the recession has lost any hope of success now; the potential of new models of receivers in an economy where people have all reduced discretionary spending is nil. AM HD is and was a dreadful idea, and the best way to discover this is to buy an HD car radio and listen. To say it is annoying is an understatement. I had a belief in HD on FM. But there are no radios anywhere at retail, and scant few on the web. What could have worked were the economy robust will be like AM stereo... too late to meet market needs. In a few years, stations will have developed robust new alternative delivery options, and HD won't be one of them. Like a relationship gone bad, it's hard to admit when something is over. I have pretty much decided that HD is not even worth the discussion time any more... with an exception being to hope that the 10 db increase in digital power on FM not be approved." Do you have an actual ? Citation ? [Link] with d'Eduardo's Name posted with it . . . Otherwise this appears to be another one of your made-up {fabricated} posts about HD-Radio Failing ~ RHF |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 09 May 2009 00:58:38 -0700, ~ RHF wrote:
Do you have an actual ? Citation ? [Link] with d'Eduardo's Name posted with it . . . Otherwise this appears to be another one of your made-up {fabricated} posts about HD-Radio Failing ~ RHF . The message first appeared on the ba.broadcast group in a thread about who owns or knows somebody who owns a HD radio. Frank Dresser |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 9, 9:18 am, Frank Dresser wrote:
On Sat, 09 May 2009 00:58:38 -0700, ~ RHF wrote: Do you have an actual ? Citation ? [Link] with d'Eduardo's Name posted with it . . . Otherwise this appears to be another one of your made-up {fabricated} posts about HD-Radio Failing ~ RHF . The message first appeared on the ba.broadcast group in a thread about who owns or knows somebody who owns a HD radio. Frank Dresser Hey frankie boy - If you're referring to me, I do own an HD radio. A Sony XDR-S3HD which I purchased at a "clearance sale" for $49 (regularly $200 approx.) because they couldn't unload them fast enough. No matter how you slice it HD radio is a disaster as consumers are rightly showing. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 09 May 2009 07:57:59 -0700, jimwilhelm wrote:
Hey frankie boy - If you're referring to me, I do own an HD radio. A Sony XDR-S3HD which I purchased at a "clearance sale" for $49 (regularly $200 approx.) because they couldn't unload them fast enough. No matter how you slice it HD radio is a disaster as consumers are rightly showing. I wasn't referring to you at all. I wanted to point out to RHF that the quote from David Eduardo did exist and was posted on another forum. The Eduardo quote was inconsistent with David Eduardo's previous statements on the quality of HD radio audio. I'm glad you found a HD radio deal you're happy with, although I think that's about triple what a HD radio is worth. Frank Dresser |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 9, 9:18�am, Frank Dresser wrote:
On Sat, 09 May 2009 00:58:38 -0700, ~ RHF wrote: Do you have an actual ? Citation ? [Link] with d'Eduardo's Name posted with it . . . Otherwise this appears to be another one of your made-up {fabricated} posts about HD-Radio Failing ~ RHF �. The message first appeared on the ba.broadcast group in a thread about who owns or knows somebody who owns a HD radio. Frank Dresser From Eduardo: What might have worked prior to the recession has lost any hope of success now; the potential of new models of receivers in an economy where people have all reduced discretionary spending is nil. AM HD is and was a dreadful idea, and the best way to discover this is to buy an HD car radio and listen. To say it is annoying is an understatement. I had a belief in HD on FM. But there are no radios anywhere at retail, and scant few on the web. What could have worked were the economy robust will be like AM stereo... too late to meet market needs. In a few years, stations will have developed robust new alternative delivery options, and HD won't be one of them. Like a relationship gone bad, it's hard to admit when something is over. I have pretty much decided that HD is not even worth the discussion time any more... with an exception being to hope that the 10 db increase in digital power on FM not be approved. http://groups.google.com/group/ba.br...508d401547fbbc |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
PocketRadio wrote:
What might have worked prior to the recession has lost any hope of success now; the potential of new models of receivers in an economy where people have all reduced discretionary spending is nil. AM HD is and was a dreadful idea, and the best way to discover this is to buy an HD car radio and listen. To say it is annoying is an understatement. I had a belief in HD on FM. But there are no radios anywhere at retail, and scant few on the web. What could have worked were the economy robust will be like AM stereo... too late to meet market needs. In a few years, stations will have developed robust new alternative delivery options, and HD won't be one of them. Like a relationship gone bad, it's hard to admit when something is over. I have pretty much decided that HD is not even worth the discussion time any more... with an exception being to hope that the 10 db increase in digital power on FM not be approved. The AMers (and low-power FMers) would have been much better off pushing for all licensees to get a digital channel in a dedicated (non-mediumwave) digital band, where all the nighttime interference would be nonexistent, where AMs and FMs and low-power stations and high-power stations would have started over on an equal footing and with absolutely perfect coverage of their markets. But they were sold a bill of goods by the big chains, who wanted to preserve the superiority of the facilities they had paid many millions for -- superiority over the small station owner. IBOC preserves the inferior -- some might say hopelessly, impossibly inferior -- status of the small broadcaster. And that was its primary purpose all along. In short, these small businessmen have been totally snookered and hoodwinked. Like the DX listener and the ordinary listener, they've been unfairly cheated out of digital technology's promise and the excellent service to the community they could have had with a dedicated digital band. With every good wish, Kevin. -- http://kevinalfredstrom.com/ |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Eduardo - Has Working In Radio Cost You A Loan? | Shortwave | |||
WANTED: SGC SG-2000 SG2000 Working or Not Working | Swap | |||
Markie, get some therapy | General | |||
Does cured Epoxy absorb microwaves? | Homebrew | |||
Why does Markie have estrogen therapy? | CB |