m II wrote:
dave wrote:

You are a tool. If you aren't part of the solution you are the problem.



If you aren't part of the solution, you're precipitate...




mike



Add some heat.

Look at what B HO and those ObamaButtKissers say about Rush Limbaugh's
kidneys.
www.libertypost.org
cuhulin

wrote:
Look at what B HO and those ObamaButtKissers say about Rush Limbaugh's
kidneys.
www.libertypost.org
cuhulin

Wanda Sykes said she wanted Mr. Limbaugh's kidneys to fail. Mr. Obama
was seen laughing at about the same time.

In article ,
dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 16:00:37 -0700, Telamon wrote:

In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:

would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
over it's lemmings, childish name calling.
Yeah, Americans losing their free speech rights would be hilarious.

I think we should start with you.
Anybody was able to say anything they wanted before and after the
Fairness Doctrine was repealed.

SNIP

Baloney, people reading this news group were not born yesterday. I
remember the way things were before and after the "unfairness doctrine"
was enforced. For some reason you got the left point of view and that
was it. I could not stand listening to talk radio with the liberals in
control as a right wringer calling in would get shouted down by the
host. Basically people that called in got the same treatment from the
hosts as the liberal assholes that spew their crap on Usenet do here
today. The same old liberal lying crap said over and over like that will
make it true. Well keep dreaming that the "unfairness doctrine" will
make a comeback as it is the only chance you got to fool people into
believing the liberal lie.


What ARE you talking about? Give a concrete example. Hell, Limbaugh
started during the era of the Fairness Doctrine. What about Joe Pyne?
Morton Downey Junior? Wally George? etc?

I'm talking about pre-Limbaugh. All there was to listen to on FM opinion
and news were liberals. Same deal on the public service stations. Those
people were not on the air back in NY or out here in southern
California. I have never listened any of the people you mentioned and I
don't watch TV.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 22:31:24 -0700, Telamon wrote:

In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 16:00:37 -0700, Telamon wrote:

In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:


would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party
has over it's lemmings, childish name calling.

Yeah, Americans losing their free speech rights would be hilarious.

I think we should start with you.

Anybody was able to say anything they wanted before and after the
Fairness Doctrine was repealed.

SNIP

Baloney, people reading this news group were not born yesterday. I
remember the way things were before and after the "unfairness doctrine"
was enforced.
snip unrelated biased opinion

O yea?!

SNIP dumb crap

Yeah!

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) Unemployed? No need to be:
www.LayoffRemedy.com" wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 15:57:53 -0700, Telamon
wrote:


I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved
down out throats in the near future but it will be called something
else.

CLUE, Mindless Loser -- FAIRNESS *cannot** be FORCED
upon anyone any more than any FREEDOM can

Clue kook-aid drinker it's the "unfairness doctrine"

For public airwaves to be ABUSED to give ONE-sided and
BIGOTED views -- as FAUX News has been doing. is UNfair.

That's for making my point.

ALL media should be required to present ALL sides of
issues, equally. And IF presented in a biased fashion, the
opposite view should be presented with EQUAL vigor.

You mean to say all media should required to present the point of view
you like and that's it.

**VIVA** the FAIRNESS Doctrine!!

The "unfairness doctrine" run by the liberal fascists.

-- (¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯)

Kook-aid drinker.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) Otherwise known as dork breath:

SNIP

The SOONER the Fairness Doctrine is reinstated, the BETTER!

SNIP

The liberal kook-aid drinker wants his views shoved down our throats.
What a kook.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 16:00:37 -0700, Telamon wrote:

In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:

would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
over it's lemmings, childish name calling.
Yeah, Americans losing their free speech rights would be hilarious.

I think we should start with you.
Anybody was able to say anything they wanted before and after the
Fairness Doctrine was repealed.
SNIP

Baloney, people reading this news group were not born yesterday. I
remember the way things were before and after the "unfairness doctrine"
was enforced. For some reason you got the left point of view and that
was it. I could not stand listening to talk radio with the liberals in
control as a right wringer calling in would get shouted down by the
host. Basically people that called in got the same treatment from the
hosts as the liberal assholes that spew their crap on Usenet do here
today. The same old liberal lying crap said over and over like that will
make it true. Well keep dreaming that the "unfairness doctrine" will
make a comeback as it is the only chance you got to fool people into
believing the liberal lie.

What ARE you talking about? Give a concrete example. Hell, Limbaugh
started during the era of the Fairness Doctrine. What about Joe Pyne?
Morton Downey Junior? Wally George? etc?

I'm talking about pre-Limbaugh. All there was to listen to on FM opinion
and news were liberals. Same deal on the public service stations. Those
people were not on the air back in NY or out here in southern
California. I have never listened any of the people you mentioned and I
don't watch TV.


That sounds like KPFK.

http://www.well.com/user/dmsml/kpfk1959/index.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Pyne

(Rebecca De Mornay's Dad) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wally_george

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morton_Downey_Jr

And in NYC, how could you miss this guy?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Grant_(radio)

In article ,
dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 16:00:37 -0700, Telamon wrote:

In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:

would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
over it's lemmings, childish name calling.
Yeah, Americans losing their free speech rights would be hilarious.

I think we should start with you.
Anybody was able to say anything they wanted before and after the
Fairness Doctrine was repealed.
SNIP

Baloney, people reading this news group were not born yesterday. I
remember the way things were before and after the "unfairness doctrine"
was enforced. For some reason you got the left point of view and that
was it. I could not stand listening to talk radio with the liberals in
control as a right wringer calling in would get shouted down by the
host. Basically people that called in got the same treatment from the
hosts as the liberal assholes that spew their crap on Usenet do here
today. The same old liberal lying crap said over and over like that will
make it true. Well keep dreaming that the "unfairness doctrine" will
make a comeback as it is the only chance you got to fool people into
believing the liberal lie.

What ARE you talking about? Give a concrete example. Hell, Limbaugh
started during the era of the Fairness Doctrine. What about Joe Pyne?
Morton Downey Junior? Wally George? etc?

I'm talking about pre-Limbaugh. All there was to listen to on FM opinion
and news were liberals. Same deal on the public service stations. Those
people were not on the air back in NY or out here in southern
California. I have never listened any of the people you mentioned and I
don't watch TV.


That sounds like KPFK.

http://www.well.com/user/dmsml/kpfk1959/index.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Pyne

(Rebecca De Mornay's Dad) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wally_george

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morton_Downey_Jr

And in NYC, how could you miss this guy?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Grant_(radio)

I didn't live in NYC but in western NY in the Buffalo area.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) Unemployed? No need to be:
www.LayoffRemedy.com" wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2009 13:38:27 -0700,
Telamon wrote:
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) Unemployed? No need to be:
www.LayoffRemedy.com wrote:
Telamon wrote:


I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved
down out throats in the near future but it will be called something
else.

CLUE, Mindless Loser -- FAIRNESS *cannot** be FORCED
upon anyone any more than any FREEDOM can

Clue: It's the "unfairness doctrine."

Wrong. Because it requires BOTH sides of issues to be
presented EQUALLY. And *that* is FAIR.

I'm right and you know it Mr. Minister of propaganda.

For public airwaves to be ABUSED to give ONE-sided and
BIGOTED views -- as FAUX News has been doing. is UNfair.

ALL media should be required to present ALL sides of
issues, equally. And IF presented in a biased fashion, the
opposite view should be presented with EQUAL vigor.

You mean to say all media should required to present the
point of view you like and that's it.

Wrong! I mean to present both sides as the FACTS make
clear. Are you **afraid** of relevant FACTS?

Get this through your very thick head. What you intend has no basis on
what the liberal Dem's intend to do.

**VIVA** the FAIRNESS Doctrine!!

stupidity-flush

You going to flush yourself O'clueless one.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California