On May 27, 2:39*pm, Kevin Cunningham wrote:
On May 27,

(gone)
- - Liberal-Fascists are almost always stuck with
- - their heads-up-their-old-wealth-pasts ~ RHF

- Repetition doesn't make Liberals "Fascists".
- Fascism is a right wing concept and goal.
- Liberals favor democratic rule over dictatorships.

Repeating Liberal Lies and Democrat Party
of the USA Distortions does not change the
Fact that Liberal-Fascism Exists [.] *~ RHF
*.

(Tons and tons of crap deleted)

- And you can't define it, place the concept with it's founder, say
who
- else uses it but it's still real. *Sort of like "Alice in
Wonderland".

- Yes, the Wonderland of right wing dementia.

Keith Cunningham - 'right wing dementia'

- - - = = = RHF's Canned Reply 'Rant' = = = - - -
[: To Liberal-Fascist Name Calling :]
ROTFL - You Know When You Are Winning An Argument :
When a Super-Smart 'Enlightened" Liberal Starts Name Calling*.
* They Lose Their Ability To Think And Get Emotional - rotfl ~ RHF
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...8979fbe8546cfa

On May 27, 7:53*pm, wrote:
On May 27, 2:17*am, Gary Forbis wrote:

Repetition doesn't make Liberals "Fascists".
Fascism is a right wing concept and goal.
Liberals favor democratic rule over dictatorships.

Publik School Neo-Commie brainwashing is a terrible thing to waste
Yet another Liberal Fascist propaganda lie by yet another ignorant
Liberal Fascist.
This is getting to be fun entertainment. *Like watching Kernal Klink
and Sargent Shultz - ROTFLMAO!
HEIL LIBERAL FASCIST HITLER!!!

Once again, you right wing weirdos are happy to use a term, unhappy to
define the term. So tell us, moron, what is a liberal fascist? A
fascist who is to the liberal side?

On May 27, 9:05*pm, "~ RHF" wrote:
On May 27, 2:42*pm, Kevin Cunningham wrote:

On May 27, 1:33*pm, "~ RHF" wrote:

On May 27, 12:23*am, Gary Forbis wrote:

On May 26, 10:18*pm, "Brenda Ann" wrote:

"Gary Forbis" wrote in message

...
So, Is the conservative or liberal point of view to impose their will
upon the woman?

Consider this. *Suppose a quadraplegic takes up residence in your
home without your permission. *Do you then become responsible
for the care of this human being? *If you say no then why does
a woman become responsbile for some human who takes up
residency in her womb without her permission?

Has she not, by virtue of having had the requisite coitus, given defacto
permission (rape notwithstanding)?

- No. *pregnancy is no more a result of coitus
- than becoming a millionare is a result of
- playing lotto.

GF - Oh Ye Great Denier of Biology {Obama-Speaker©}

-*While you have to play to win few who play actually win.

-wrt- The Human Sexual Act it's about 1-in-4 Chances.
-ps- That Ain't a Million to One.

-*Most who do it do it for fun not for the chance
- of having a baby.

Then again - Some/Many 'Do It' to Create a Baby :
Which is a Natural Outcome of the Sexual Act.

-*Those who do it to have a baby will not ask
- for the human to be evicted.

Abortion is not an 'eviction'

The 'evicted' are out-on-the-street
-but- Very Much Alive
-and- Have a 'Chance' at a New Day
-and- A New Beginning for Their Life

The "Aborted" Are Dead {Murdered}
-yeah- Very Much Dead
-and- Have a 'NO Chance' at a New Day
-and- A NO Beginning of Their Life

Partial Birth Abortion -aka- ObamaCide©

-*There is no meeting of the minds between
- the parties prior to human taking up resident
- in the womb so no contract was made.

Don't Know whether there was a 'meeting-of-the-minds'
-but- There Was Sure A "Meeting-of-the-Bodies"

GF - "human taking up resident in the womb"

# 1 - Yes It Is A Living Human Being :
Not an organic tissue sample to disposed of...

# 2 - "taking up resident in the womb"
You make it sound like some space alien invasion.
*.

- Interesting, mostly when I read an anti-abortion screed, it's
written
- by some guy. *Now why is that? *Is it because banning abortion won't
- influence them at all? *Sorta like Briston Palin's boy friend.
-
- And this "guy" is the same way. *He's not going to have a baby, he's
- not going to deliver but he's still against every thing that doesn't
- affect him.

KC - Have One of Your Children Aborted {Murdered}
Without Your Knowledge : Until Then STFU ~ RHF
*.

So tell us, prick, when did you have an abortion? What have you
actually experienced?

Just like all the scum sucking anti-abortion male activists you have
never been pregnant but you know aaalllllll about abortion. The facts
are simple. You are scared of women. You are scared to let women go
and talk to their doctors and make their own decisions.

And you are too gutless to have insisted that the repugs quit playing
politics with the abortion issue. Yeah, a real gutless individual.
When you had the power you never, ever proposed a constitutional
amendment, a bill, any thing to out law abortion. You were happy to
be used as a cash cow.

On May 27, 3:40*pm, Meldon wrote:

You heard it here first! Men by simply having sex, are not responsible
for unwanted pregnancies because there’s no guarantee of pregnancy.

While there can be no meeting of the minds between the mother or
father and the life created there can be a meeting of the minds
between
the mother and the father concerning any life created. It behooves
the
couple to make a contract concerning such matters.

We can move down the road to what obligations a society can force
upon an individual if you'd like. We'd need to start from basic
principles
concerning such matters so we know these principles are consistently
applied in all our decisions. Both the left and the right seem to be
helter-skelter on the application of first principles.

Telamon wrote:


It's your history if you live in America.


Genocide and slavery mark the early years, followed by hypocrisy and
plunder.

Kevin Cunningham wrote:
On May 27, 7:53 pm, wrote:
On May 27, 2:17 am, Gary Forbis wrote:

Repetition doesn't make Liberals "Fascists".
Fascism is a right wing concept and goal.
Liberals favor democratic rule over dictatorships.
Publik School Neo-Commie brainwashing is a terrible thing to waste
Yet another Liberal Fascist propaganda lie by yet another ignorant
Liberal Fascist.
This is getting to be fun entertainment. Like watching Kernal Klink
and Sargent Shultz - ROTFLMAO!
HEIL LIBERAL FASCIST HITLER!!!

Once again, you right wing weirdos are happy to use a term, unhappy to
define the term. So tell us, moron, what is a liberal fascist? A
fascist who is to the liberal side?

He thinks that the Nazis were socialists because they used the word in
their name. Like when the commies call a country a "peoples' republic".
It's plain cynicism, which flies right over the Bircher's head.

Do you have flush toilets? (yes, one sh.tter) Difficulty with bathing
(no) and undressing? (no)
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=265364

Don't look at me, I am not going to help you.
cuhulin

wrote:
On May 27, 4:39 pm, Kevin Cunningham
wrote:
On May 27,

(gone)
- - Liberal-Fascists are almost always stuck with
- - their heads-up-their-old-wealth-pasts ~ RHF

- Repetition doesn't make Liberals "Fascists".
- Fascism is a right wing concept and goal.
- Liberals favor democratic rule over dictatorships.

Repeating Liberal Lies and Democrat Party
of the USA Distortions does not change the
Fact that Liberal-Fascism Exists [.] ~ RHF
.

(Tons and tons of crap deleted)

And you can't define it, place the concept with it's
founder, say
who else uses it but it's still real. Sort of like
"Alice in
Wonderland".

Yes, the Wonderland of right wing dementia.

ROTFLMAO!!!

This is fun Fun FUN ! Kernal Klink and Sargent Shultz
hilarious -
ROTFLMAO!
HEIL LIBERAL FASCIST HITLER!!!

Ah, another Dementia Wonderland dweller.

http://www.publiceye.org/glossary/glossary_big.html#f

Fascism and neofascism: Fascism is an especially virulent
form of *far-right* populism. Fascism glorifies national,
racial, or cultural unity and collective rebirth while
seeking to purge imagined enemies, and attacks both
revolutionary movements and liberal pluralism in favor of
militarized, totalitarian mass politics. Fascism first
crystallized in Europe in response to the Bolshevik
Revolution and the devastation of World War I, and then
spread to other parts of the world. If it is a post-WWII
occurrence it should be called neofascist or neofascism
unless it solely involves participants in older movements.
Neofascists reinterpret fascist ideology and strategy in
various ways to fit new circumstances.

~ RHF wrote:
On May 27, 2:39 pm, Kevin Cunningham
wrote:
On May 27,

(gone)
- - Liberal-Fascists are almost always stuck with
- - their heads-up-their-old-wealth-pasts ~ RHF

- Repetition doesn't make Liberals "Fascists".
- Fascism is a right wing concept and goal.
- Liberals favor democratic rule over dictatorships.

Repeating Liberal Lies and Democrat Party
of the USA Distortions does not change the
Fact that Liberal-Fascism Exists [.] ~ RHF
.

(Tons and tons of crap deleted)

- And you can't define it, place the concept with it's
founder, say
who
- else uses it but it's still real. Sort of like "Alice in
Wonderland".

- Yes, the Wonderland of right wing dementia.

Keith Cunningham - 'right wing dementia'

- - - = = = RHF's Canned Reply 'Rant' = = = - - -
[: To Liberal-Fascist Name Calling :]
ROTFL - You Know When You Are Winning An Argument :
When a Super-Smart 'Enlightened" Liberal Starts Name
Calling*.
* They Lose Their Ability To Think And Get Emotional -
rotfl ~ RHF
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...8979fbe8546cfa
.
kevin, Kevin. KEVIN ! - You are becoming a
real Obama-Speaker© {Truth Denier & Deleter}
.
The ObamaSpeakers© Denying That "Liberal-Fascism" Exists
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...943adbe30480e1
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...d3aa8461de1401
~ibid~
.
The Validity of the Term "Liberal Fascist"
? Can It Exist?
? Does It Exist ?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...4569002bba33ca
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...bc4aa52f959d40
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...070611dd003a01
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...e38e44a0d1c320
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...5e688bb0612c63
~ibid~
.
Obama-Regime© Using Left-Wing Radial High Tech
Media Shout-Down BARACKING©
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...579a6b903e62b1
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...dda4284110e71f
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...dcfdaa2b7cbc2d
.
Don't Let The Truth Be Told : Manufacturing the Democrat
Half-Truth and Liberal Media Lie by Distorting the Facts
and Reality.
~ibid~
.
Therefore It Follows . . . -from- Wikipedia
The National Socialist German Workers' Party
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationa...Workers%E2%80%...
(German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei)
Abbreviated NSDAP), commonly known in English
as the NAZI Party
(Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei)
was a political party in Germany between 1919 and 1945.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi
It was known as the German Workers' Party (DAP)
.
Today we have 21st Century "Liberal-Fascism"
and the Liberal-Fascist Agents of Social Change.
-aka- The Democrat Party of the USA attempting
to Socialize the Nation under their One Party Control
with their Charismatic Leader {Totalitarian} Barack
'Hussein' Obama . -aka- Change You Can Believe In !
-aka- "The Third Way" via Fascism Authoritarian {Elitist}
and Totalitarian
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_position
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarian
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarianism
.
The Validity of the Term "Liberal-Fascist"
? Can Liberal-Fascism Exist?
? Do Liberal-Fascists Exist ?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...4569002bba33ca
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...bc4aa52f959d40
~ibid~
.
Denying the potential existence of 'Liberal-Fascism'
does not change the fact that 'Liberal-Fascism' may
and can exist in the world today.
.
Liberal-Fascist :
Employing the Justification, Means and Tactics of
Fascism {National Socialism} to Achieve the Ends
of a One Party Liberal {Socialist} Agenda is what
has morphed into "Liberal-Fascism" and those who
are the Agents-of-One-Party-Socialist-Change are
in-fact Liberal-Fascist.
* Classically Fascism had one reasoned definition
in the early 1900s. -but- Time Changes Words and
their Meanings . . .
.
Time often changes Words and the Meaning
of Words; and that is part of the Evolution of
Language with the Passage of Time.
.
Hence the use of the 'Hyphen' between the Two
Words Linking Them and Uniting Them into One
Compound Word with a New Meaning and Usage.
"Liberal-Fascism" & "Liberal-Fascist"
.
Liberal & Fascist have now become One Newly
'Hyphenated' {Combination} Word "Liberal-Fascist"
with it's own new unique meaning.

Yeah, it makes as much sense as "waterless water."

http://www.publiceye.org/glossary/glossary_big.html#f

Fascism and neofascism: Fascism is an especially virulent
form of far-right populism. Fascism glorifies national,
racial, or cultural unity and collective rebirth while
seeking to purge imagined enemies, and attacks both
revolutionary movements and liberal pluralism in favor of
militarized, totalitarian mass politics. Fascism first
crystallized in Europe in response to the Bolshevik
Revolution and the devastation of World War I, and then
spread to other parts of the world. If it is a post-WWII
occurrence it should be called neofascist or neofascism
unless it solely involves participants in older movements.
Neofascists reinterpret fascist ideology and strategy in
various ways to fit new circumstances.

Kevin Cunningham wrote:
On May 27, 7:53 pm, wrote:
On May 27, 2:17 am, Gary Forbis wrote:

Repetition doesn't make Liberals "Fascists".
Fascism is a right wing concept and goal.
Liberals favor democratic rule over dictatorships.
Publik School Neo-Commie brainwashing is a terrible thing to waste
Yet another Liberal Fascist propaganda lie by yet another ignorant
Liberal Fascist.
This is getting to be fun entertainment. Like watching Kernal Klink
and Sargent Shultz - ROTFLMAO!
HEIL LIBERAL FASCIST HITLER!!!

Once again, you right wing weirdos are happy to use a term, unhappy to
define the term. So tell us, moron, what is a liberal fascist? A
fascist who is to the liberal side?




Modern Republicans and Democrats both misuse the term "fascist" --
and to such a degree that the misuse has started to be enshrined in
dictionaries.

In the broad sense, the term (from the Latin for "bundle") just
means the strength of a united people -- as in the ancient Roman
story in which a father asks his sons to gather sticks from the
forest and bring them to him. Taking the wooden rods one at a time,
he easily breaks each of them in two. But when the very same rods
are bound together -- symbolizing a united family or people -- they
are unbreakable.

The fascist symbol, or _fasces_, thus became the symbol of the Roman
Republic and its ideals. It was also used by the French republic,
was adopted by Mussolini's 20th century Fascist movement, and was
also used by the United States during the same era.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fasces

The U.S. dime displayed the fascist symbol on its reverse from
1916-1945 See

http://www.mountainviewcoins.com/10%...rse%201926.jpg

and

http://www.mountainviewcoins.com/Mercury_Dimes.php

and it is displayed prominently to this day in the main chamber of
the U.S. Senate:

http://tinyurl.com/jfk-fasces

It's also a prominent element of Daniel Chester French's highly
idealized sculpture in the Lincoln Memorial.

In the narrow sense, fascism means specifically the social movement
popularized by Benito Mussolini and to some degree carried on into
more recent times by the Movimento Sociale Italiano.

It was characterized by the ideal of the state as expressing the
will of the people, with the people being an organic, natural
entity, not divided into classes with differing economic interests
but instead with each sector of society (such as farmers, laborers,
administrators, merchants, et cetera) able to elect its own
legislative representatives. In practice, many compromises were made
with allies and with the old order of things.

The central government and ruling party had a lot of authority under
Italian fascism, and that is really the only similarity real fascism
shares with the pop-definition of the word. But other central
governments and parties past and present had similar or greater
degrees of authority -- such in fact being the norm for almost all
human societies throughout history.

The pop-definition of "fascist" is roughly "big, bad, scary, and
mean authoritarianism."

"Fascist" is used by the Democrat gang to refer to the Republicans
and their often authoritarian views on (among other things) war,
drugs, and sexuality -- and by the Republican gang to refer to the
Democrats and their often authoritarian views on (among other
things) freedom of association, financial privacy, and taxation.

It's misused that way because both sides think they can make brownie
points by scaring voters with the spectre of authoritarianism from
the rival gang.

Here's the truth: both modern Republicans and modern Democrats score
pretty high on the authoritarianism scale -- somewhat higher, I'd
say, than the Movimento Sociale Italiano.



With every good wish,


Kevin Alfred Strom.
--
http://kevinalfredstrom.com/