Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dgital Radio (DRM) is useless
"But, on the downside, some of our panel experienced problems at night
- and we saw these effects in our measurements as well. The problem will be familiar to many listeners to medium-wave: at night, changes in the atmosphere mean that signals from distant transmitters reach our shores more easily. On medium-wave, you might hear this as cross- talk: a foreign voice underneath what you're trying to listen to, or the occasional 'splat' of another transmission. The issue we came across with DRM is that this interference causes the radio to stop decoding the signal: sometimes only momentarily, sometimes for a while longer. So rather than listening through the interference, it's like all digital systems: you either get it (and so get it at a consistently high quality) or you don't get it at all. So while most of the panel continued to listen without experiencing any problems, some of them found they were only served during the day and had patchy coverage at night. And of course this problem became worse as the hours of daylight shrunk during the autumn; so by winter, some were beginning to experience poor reception in the late afternoon." http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/radiolabs...&ssoc=register |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Dgital Radio (DRM) is useless
In article
, Booble wrote: "But, on the downside, some of our panel experienced problems at night - and we saw these effects in our measurements as well. The problem will be familiar to many listeners to medium-wave: at night, changes in the atmosphere mean that signals from distant transmitters reach our shores more easily. On medium-wave, you might hear this as cross- talk: a foreign voice underneath what you're trying to listen to, or the occasional 'splat' of another transmission. The issue we came across with DRM is that this interference causes the radio to stop decoding the signal: sometimes only momentarily, sometimes for a while longer. So rather than listening through the interference, it's like all digital systems: you either get it (and so get it at a consistently high quality) or you don't get it at all. So while most of the panel continued to listen without experiencing any problems, some of them found they were only served during the day and had patchy coverage at night. And of course this problem became worse as the hours of daylight shrunk during the autumn; so by winter, some were beginning to experience poor reception in the late afternoon." http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/radiolabs...ale_our_med.sh tml?ssorl=1244337111&ssols=13&ssoc=register DRM is smoke and mirrors just like IBOC. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Dgital Radio (DRM) is useless
Telamon wrote:
DRM is smoke and mirrors just like IBOC. drm is ... working for your money ... Sorry, because our engineer can't sit and wait, he's been busy on dab, dab+, drm, drm+.... He's now gone invent some new digital tv format too .... dvbt+ ... When he stops inventing media, he'll be busy doing some antivirus or pro virus inventions ... -- -- 700+ Radio Stations on SW http://swstations.tk/ Shortwave transmissions in English, Francais, Nederlands, Deutsch, Suid-Afrikaans, Chinese, Dansk, Urdu, Cantonese, Greek, Spanish, Portuguese, ... http://radiolanguages.tk Updated every month or so .... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Dgital Radio (DRM) is useless
Telamon wrote:
In article , Booble wrote: "But, on the downside, some of our panel experienced problems at night - and we saw these effects in our measurements as well. The problem will be familiar to many listeners to medium-wave: at night, changes in the atmosphere mean that signals from distant transmitters reach our shores more easily. On medium-wave, you might hear this as cross- talk: a foreign voice underneath what you're trying to listen to, or the occasional 'splat' of another transmission. The issue we came across with DRM is that this interference causes the radio to stop decoding the signal: sometimes only momentarily, sometimes for a while longer. So rather than listening through the interference, it's like all digital systems: you either get it (and so get it at a consistently high quality) or you don't get it at all. So while most of the panel continued to listen without experiencing any problems, some of them found they were only served during the day and had patchy coverage at night. And of course this problem became worse as the hours of daylight shrunk during the autumn; so by winter, some were beginning to experience poor reception in the late afternoon." http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/radiolabs...ale_our_med.sh tml?ssorl=1244337111&ssols=13&ssoc=register DRM is smoke and mirrors just like IBOC. Does DRM have conditional access capability. Digital means information is no longer free. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Dgital Radio (DRM) is useless
dave wrote:
Does DRM have conditional access capability. Digital means information is no longer free. Exactly. It can serve as a lock on the receiving end. In many cases it also means information is no longer private. The data stream, at last on the 'net, tells you who's doing what and where. The digital fingerprints are everywhere, allowing easy tracking. Why should electronic mail be any different than normal mail? Privacy should be a given in either case. PGP encryption is viable, but only in a limited number of cases. mike |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Dgital Radio (DRM) is useless
In article ,
user wrote: Telamon wrote: DRM is smoke and mirrors just like IBOC. drm is ... working for your money ... Sorry, because our engineer can't sit and wait, he's been busy on dab, dab+, drm, drm+.... He's now gone invent some new digital tv format too .... dvbt+ ... When he stops inventing media, he'll be busy doing some antivirus or pro virus inventions ... DRM was not invented. It is all old technology being misapplied to a medium that does not support it well so all during its "development" it was continually revised to take up more spectrum and power just to support the original claims that were made for it. The original claims turned out to be all lies. Here is a phrase that works for me "DRM and IBOC both suck." -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Dgital Radio (DRM) is useless
In article ,
dave wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Booble wrote: "But, on the downside, some of our panel experienced problems at night - and we saw these effects in our measurements as well. The problem will be familiar to many listeners to medium-wave: at night, changes in the atmosphere mean that signals from distant transmitters reach our shores more easily. On medium-wave, you might hear this as cross- talk: a foreign voice underneath what you're trying to listen to, or the occasional 'splat' of another transmission. The issue we came across with DRM is that this interference causes the radio to stop decoding the signal: sometimes only momentarily, sometimes for a while longer. So rather than listening through the interference, it's like all digital systems: you either get it (and so get it at a consistently high quality) or you don't get it at all. So while most of the panel continued to listen without experiencing any problems, some of them found they were only served during the day and had patchy coverage at night. And of course this problem became worse as the hours of daylight shrunk during the autumn; so by winter, some were beginning to experience poor reception in the late afternoon." http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/radiolabs...ndiale_our_med .sh tml?ssorl=1244337111&ssols=13&ssoc=register DRM is smoke and mirrors just like IBOC. Does DRM have conditional access capability. Digital means information is no longer free. Yes, digital means information can be controlled with keys. You will have to pay for the additional complexity of the receiver and rent a key for access. This can create a continuous revenue stream from you to the provider. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Dgital Radio (DRM) is useless
In article , m II wrote:
dave wrote: Does DRM have conditional access capability. Digital means information is no longer free. Exactly. It can serve as a lock on the receiving end. In many cases it also means information is no longer private. The data stream, at last on the 'net, tells you who's doing what and where. The digital fingerprints are everywhere, allowing easy tracking. Why should electronic mail be any different than normal mail? Privacy should be a given in either case. PGP encryption is viable, but only in a limited number of cases. Yes, it is also a privacy issue. If that were in place today and you had to subscribe to Hal Turner in order to hear his show the thought police would currently be on your trail. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Thanks for screwing up the group again Markie you useless no-code. | CB | |||
Space Weather or HAARP? Shortwave is useless | Shortwave | |||
More useless statistics. We've been spying on you! | Shortwave |