| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 2, 3:48*pm, "Brenda Ann" wrote:
I don't care how many samples you take of a complex waveform with an ADC/DAC system, the resultant playback waveform will never represent the original analog waveform as well as a high end analog device. Even a simple 1000 Hz sine wave will not come out as a pure sine wave after digital conversion, it will be a series of stepped square waves. You may not be able to tell the difference with your ear, as long as there are enough of those little steps, but that's not the point. The point is, it will not "run circles around" a high end analog device. Nonsense. Format 1 bit DSD (Direct Stream Digital) Sampling frequency 2.8224 MHz Dynamic range 120 dB Frequency range 20 Hz - 50 kHz The SACD format is capable of delivering a dynamic range of 120 dB from 20 Hz to 20 kHz and an extended frequency response up to 100 kHz! Try to duplicate that with any "high-end analog device". Quantum physicists state the universe is digital. It is your inferior sensory organs which can not resolve the digital universe. Get over it! Radio is the enemy - ANALog is dead! |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"0baMa0 Tse Dung" wrote in message ... On Jul 2, 3:48 pm, "Brenda Ann" wrote: I don't care how many samples you take of a complex waveform with an ADC/DAC system, the resultant playback waveform will never represent the original analog waveform as well as a high end analog device. Even a simple 1000 Hz sine wave will not come out as a pure sine wave after digital conversion, it will be a series of stepped square waves. You may not be able to tell the difference with your ear, as long as there are enough of those little steps, but that's not the point. The point is, it will not "run circles around" a high end analog device. Nonsense. Format 1 bit DSD (Direct Stream Digital) Sampling frequency 2.8224 MHz Dynamic range 120 dB Frequency range 20 Hz - 50 kHz The SACD format is capable of delivering a dynamic range of 120 dB from 20 Hz to 20 kHz and an extended frequency response up to 100 kHz! Try to duplicate that with any "high-end analog device". Sorry. Apples and oranges. I once built a two transistor pre-amp that was flat from 10 Hz to over 2 MHz. Thing is, it didn't have all that good of a distortion figure. Digitally reproduced analog waveforms have distortion. There is simply no way around it. You cannot make a true, perfect sine waveform out of a bunch of square waves. It can't be done. Further, the universe is most certainly not digital. About the closest thing you get to digital in the universe is a hydrogen atom. But even the radio frequency wave output from a hydrogen atom is a sine wave: analog. Digital can only be a representation, in various degrees of fidelity, of an analog signal. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Brenda Ann wrote:
"0baMa0 Tse Dung" wrote in message ... On Jul 2, 3:48 pm, "Brenda Ann" wrote: I don't care how many samples you take of a complex waveform with an ADC/DAC system, the resultant playback waveform will never represent the original analog waveform as well as a high end analog device. Even a simple 1000 Hz sine wave will not come out as a pure sine wave after digital conversion, it will be a series of stepped square waves. You may not be able to tell the difference with your ear, as long as there are enough of those little steps, but that's not the point. The point is, it will not "run circles around" a high end analog device. Nonsense. Format 1 bit DSD (Direct Stream Digital) Sampling frequency 2.8224 MHz Dynamic range 120 dB Frequency range 20 Hz - 50 kHz The SACD format is capable of delivering a dynamic range of 120 dB from 20 Hz to 20 kHz and an extended frequency response up to 100 kHz! Try to duplicate that with any "high-end analog device". Sorry. Apples and oranges. I once built a two transistor pre-amp that was flat from 10 Hz to over 2 MHz. Thing is, it didn't have all that good of a distortion figure. Digitally reproduced analog waveforms have distortion. There is simply no way around it. You cannot make a true, perfect sine waveform out of a bunch of square waves. It can't be done. Yes, but the error from a perfect sine wave may be extremely small. In fact much lower than the noise in most analog recording methods. Further, the universe is most certainly not digital. About the closest thing you get to digital in the universe is a hydrogen atom. But even the radio frequency wave output from a hydrogen atom is a sine wave: analog. Digital can only be a representation, in various degrees of fidelity, of an analog signal. The same can be said for analog recording systems. They also introduce noise and distortion into the analog signal. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Those cats with the LOUD sound systems in their cars,,,, just think what
that is doing to their hearing. cuhulin |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article
, 0baMa0 Tse Dung wrote: On Jul 2, 3:48*pm, "Brenda Ann" wrote: I don't care how many samples you take of a complex waveform with an ADC/DAC system, the resultant playback waveform will never represent the original analog waveform as well as a high end analog device. Even a simple 1000 Hz sine wave will not come out as a pure sine wave after digital conversion, it will be a series of stepped square waves. You may not be able to tell the difference with your ear, as long as there are enough of those little steps, but that's not the point. The point is, it will not "run circles around" a high end analog device. Nonsense. Format 1 bit DSD (Direct Stream Digital) Sampling frequency 2.8224 MHz Dynamic range 120 dB Frequency range 20 Hz - 50 kHz The SACD format is capable of delivering a dynamic range of 120 dB from 20 Hz to 20 kHz and an extended frequency response up to 100 kHz! Try to duplicate that with any "high-end analog device". Quantum physicists state the universe is digital. It is your inferior sensory organs which can not resolve the digital universe. Get over it! Radio is the enemy - ANALog is dead! The universe is analog not digital so you get over it. Quantum physics stating the universe is digital is an oversimplification at best and I'm being very generous. By the way, you have already been assimilated by the analog borg. Radio is my hobby. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article 4a4e64c4.303406@chupacabra,
Bob Dobbs wrote: Telamon wrote: The universe is analog not digital so you get over it. The universe IS digital so you get used to it. That your personal biochemistry can't resolve the refresh rate only tends to mislead you into thinking it's analog. IOW: If you drive fast enough on a washboard road the bumps will only seem to go away as your suspension does its thing. Quantum physics stating the universe is digital is an oversimplification at best and I'm being very generous. You need to be more generous to yourself and not be so quick to dismiss things that overwhelm your intellect. You are clearly the one overwhelmed. We don't operate at the quantum level and neither do objects larger than the chained molecular level that we interact with so don't be so stupid to conjecture that because the science of fundamental matter has quanta energy levels that is the way macro physics world operates because it doesn't. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article 4a4e64c4.303406@chupacabra,
Bob Dobbs wrote: Telamon wrote: The universe is analog not digital so you get over it. The universe IS digital so you get used to it. That your personal biochemistry can't resolve the refresh rate only tends to mislead you into thinking it's analog. IOW: If you drive fast enough on a washboard road the bumps will only seem to go away as your suspension does its thing. Quantum physics stating the universe is digital is an oversimplification at best and I'm being very generous. You need to be more generous to yourself and not be so quick to dismiss things that overwhelm your intellect. This is a good analogy to your missive. http://news.yahoo.com/comics/uclickc...l_uc/crbal2009 0702 "Some parts of Carl's thinking think other parts are pretty nuts." "You gotta be kiddin' " -- Telamon Ventura, California |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Sony SRF-59 Walkman Converted to Shortwave | Shortwave | |||
| Eduardo – Have you ever seen a Sony Walkman model SRF-59? | Shortwave | |||
| TEEN PANTIES 5605 | Boatanchors | |||
| Teen Sister Masterbating 9159 | Digital | |||
| WTB: Recording Walkman | Swap | |||