| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 2, 5:44*am, dave wrote:
LukeP wrote: On Jul 1, 3:57 pm, Barry wrote: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...7/01/BU2618GKE.... What's an iPod? I read the article also. *Most people look at the cassette as equivalent withthe *8-track tape. *But I bet these same people would be shocked to find out that some of the better cassette decks had way better specs than a Ipod. *I have seen some of the Naks with freq. response to 27 khz and my Denon, which was a mid-level deck, has freq. response to 23 or 24 which I know is more than you can squeeze from digital at even the highest bit rate. *I'm just sayin'.......... Sad. *You can't hear much above 10 K; *why do you care about 24? You can buy a credible MP3 player for $20 that'll run circles around your POS Nakamichi. Reality check! I have yet to respond to any post on this group in over a year, but after 34 years in high end audio (sales, technical sales training, product planning and development on three continents...) I couldn't resist... Frequency range has very little to do with it. ANYTHING that compresses by any form of digital "bit grooming" can loose vital information. Case in point... A fairly high priced MP3 recorder/ player with minidisc and computer MP3 capabilities managed to lose the bells (actually a glockenspiel, I believe) at the beginning of a Phoebe Snow track that I used as a demo for years (many other examples, but this is a case in point). Digital compression can lose textures, details, imaging, transient information in ways that is COMPLETELY foreign to the human psycho-acoustic mechanism. Our ears and brain can "fill in" information lost by anything as natural and simple as bandwidth limiting, BECAUSE IT HAPPENS IN NATURE ALL THE TIME! If we, as a species, have had to deal with bandwidth limiting by something as simple as distance or intervening materials such as a drape or some walls, etc., WE HAVE ACHIEVED THE ABILITY TO RECONSTRUCT THE MISSING HARMONIC INFORMATION. And we can pull information out of the noise floor of analog recordings by dithering. I used one of the few decks that can trump all of those mentioned above (although the Nakamichi units were excellent), the Tandberg 3014A, and have been able to produce recordings that (on over $60,000.00 of amps and speakers) rivaled the very best digital technology available at the time (2005 or so), and was only lacking compared to an excellent virgin vinyl LP on $10,000 worth of turntable. As for bandwidth and digital technology... Anything that has a bit rate as high as SACD or Meridian lossless packing on DVD Audio can produce a bandwidth of 50 kHz and beyond. And that is your best hope of achieving a recording that can compete with high end analog, PERIOD! I have some SACD remasters of mid-1960 Rolling Stones recordings that sound BETTER than the British virgin vinyl recordings of the exact same performances. Of course, digital is quieter, but I've already mentioned that we can dither significant information that is below the noise floor in an analog recording. The "noise floor" in a digital recording is the point of no return. NOTHING exists there, it's all truncated. Ignored! I know of NO MP3 device that can compete with the best Tandberg, Nakamichi, Harman Kardon 400 series CD recorder regardless of the bit rate. THEY DO NOT EXIST! And a truly audiophile turntable with a moving coil cartridge can trump any of the above in most respects, but that's another subject... |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 3, 10:09*pm, guyo wrote:
And a truly audiophile turntable with a moving coil cartridge can trump any of the above in most respects, but that's another subject... Maybe so but the price is prohibitive except for the elite billionaire. For far, far less dinero a very decent SA-CD player, a modest 5.1 channel surround sound amplifier, and 5 mid-priced full range speakers and subwoofer will equal the best mucho dinero mega-bucks elite vinyl sound system TO THE VAST MAJORITY of listeners. A very good Universal SACD/CD/DVD player can be had for for $200-$600 A very good 5.1 / 7.1 channel home theatre amplifier can be had for $1000-$2000 A very good set of 5 indentical full-range speakers can be had for about $2500 used (recommended on a budget) or at least double for new speakers. A very good subwoofer for about $1000. TOTAL for an very good "audiophile system for the rest of us" - less than $10,000. And if you are prudent you can do it for half that price. (Used audiophile speakers are a bargain.) Well within reach of most "working" music lovers. If you are foolish enough to spent money on a vinyl LP system and expect to surpass the above $5K-$10K system than you had better take on a second or third job. Marry into a wealthy family. Pray and play the lottery or rob a bank - LOL! |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Sony SRF-59 Walkman Converted to Shortwave | Shortwave | |||
| Eduardo – Have you ever seen a Sony Walkman model SRF-59? | Shortwave | |||
| TEEN PANTIES 5605 | Boatanchors | |||
| Teen Sister Masterbating 9159 | Digital | |||
| WTB: Recording Walkman | Swap | |||