On Jul 28, 9:17*am, "Ruud66" wrote:
"Barry" wrote in message

...

And we're still waiting for the answers.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArti...px?ARTID=35726

This is seau Beaugus.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Univers..._United_States
There are countries having vastly superior healthsystems if being
compulsory, combining bang for buck is taken into account. Shure most
countries have gripes as well. But they get solved. Healthcare is an
economic entity like taxes are and has nothing to do with silly questions..

Now compare countries:http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...m?Docid=307&To...

- There are estimates out there that would lob off 5% making it 11% in
stead
- of 16% of GDP for a US healthcare system providing the same quality
for all.
- It's not a European system but eventually the economic modelling
will stick.
- No cadillac health insurance will be needed. And start throwing out
the
- quacks, middlemen and ambulance chasers.
-
- R

Lob-Off the Lawyers and yes you could
save about 5% of the 16% of GDP.

Close One Law School in each State and
Convert it to a General Practice [Barefoot
Doctor] Public Health System Medical School.

Allow for Probability of Benefits.

Allow for Supplemental Health Insurance
for Above-and-Beyond Coverage for those
who are willing to pay for something-extra.

=IF= Heath Care is a Universal Human Right :
Then Why Aren't All Doctors and Nurses
Mandatorily Enrolled into a National Health
Care System; without exception ? ? ?

One Size Fits All - Never Does [.] ~ RHF