|
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
I already knew how to weld, I learned how when I was a kid.There were
other night time classes too, such as plumbing and electrical, and other classes.I went for the G.I.Bill money.I can cut thick steel and iron with an Oxyacetelyne torch without a flame. cuhulin |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
On Oct 2, 1:56*pm, dave wrote:
Nick Danger wrote: Pot smoke vs tobacco smoke? Parts is parts and smoke is smoke -- and your lung parts are looking for oxygen, not smoke. Please 'splain how pot smoke can't help but be harmful to your lungs. A real answer please, no tap dancing. - It's a matter of proportion. -*Your lungs are insulted less because pot - users inhale smoke less frequently - compared to typical tobacco addicts. Yeah generally Pot Smokers take fewer "Puffs" Daily -verus- typical Tobacco Smokers. But generally Pot Smokers "Puffs" are Inhaled Deeper -verus- typical Tobacco Smokers. Often the result is that Pot Smokers fewer but deeper "Puffs" add-up to the same amount of Smoke-in-the-Lungs as the Tobacco Smokers. The Components of most Smoke from the Burning of Organic Leafy Matter are about the same. http://www.ukcia.org/research/smoke-contents.htm http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=6891 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabi...ng#Lung_cancer Growing Evidence Of Marijuana Smoke's Potential Dangers http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0805110741.htm |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
~ RHF wrote: On Oct 2, 1:56 pm, dave wrote: Nick Danger wrote: Pot smoke vs tobacco smoke? Parts is parts and smoke is smoke -- and your lung parts are looking for oxygen, not smoke. Please 'splain how pot smoke can't help but be harmful to your lungs. A real answer please, no tap dancing. - It's a matter of proportion. - Your lungs are insulted less because pot - users inhale smoke less frequently - compared to typical tobacco addicts. Yeah generally Pot Smokers take fewer "Puffs" Daily -verus- typical Tobacco Smokers. But generally Pot Smokers "Puffs" are Inhaled Deeper -verus- typical Tobacco Smokers. Often the result is that Pot Smokers fewer but deeper "Puffs" add-up to the same amount of Smoke-in-the-Lungs as the Tobacco Smokers. The Components of most Smoke from the Burning of Organic Leafy Matter are about the same. http://www.ukcia.org/research/smoke-contents.htm http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=6891 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabi...ng#Lung_cancer Growing Evidence Of Marijuana Smoke's Potential Dangers http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0805110741.htm . Secondhand Smoke {Kills} Be It : Tobacco or Marijuana http://www.lungusa.org/site/pp.asp?c=dvLUK9O0E&b=35422 dave wrote: I've been smoking reefer for 42.25 years. When may I expect these ill effects to catch up with me? Um, maybe in one or two or 'x' number of years when you go for a chest x-ray and they say you have lung cancer... How lucky do you feel? Or does the dope make you not care? |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
Flat Fenders Forever! I owns ah 1948 Willys Jeep. www.jeepdoc.com
www.jeepdraw.com www.willystech.com www.devilfinder.com Brian's Military Jeeps www.devilfinder.com 1948 Willys Jeeps www.devilfinder.com CJ3B Page Pot Heads Forever! Dale Evans (Queen of the Cowgirls has kinfolks in Mississippi.Back in the early 1950s, I saw Dale Evans sitting in a fancy Willys Jeep in Hattiesburg,Mississippi.The Stetson Hats was developed by John Stetson in Dunns Falls,Mississippi.(Dunns Falls, an old Waterfall with a Water Wheel. Also, I once read an article back in the 1950s in the now defunct Jackson Daily News (it was a Great newspaper, it shore was) about Roy Rogers (Leonard Slye, from Iowa) was once caught beating one of his Horses with a stick, or a whip/something. HUMPH!, King of the Cowboys, my arse! cuhulin |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
|
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
|
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
dave wrote:
~ RHF wrote: On Oct 2, 1:56 pm, dave wrote: Nick Danger wrote: Pot smoke vs tobacco smoke? Parts is parts and smoke is smoke -- and your lung parts are looking for oxygen, not smoke. Please 'splain how pot smoke can't help but be harmful to your lungs. A real answer please, no tap dancing. - It's a matter of proportion. - Your lungs are insulted less because pot - users inhale smoke less frequently - compared to typical tobacco addicts. Yeah generally Pot Smokers take fewer "Puffs" Daily -verus- typical Tobacco Smokers. But generally Pot Smokers "Puffs" are Inhaled Deeper -verus- typical Tobacco Smokers. Often the result is that Pot Smokers fewer but deeper "Puffs" add-up to the same amount of Smoke-in-the-Lungs as the Tobacco Smokers. The Components of most Smoke from the Burning of Organic Leafy Matter are about the same. http://www.ukcia.org/research/smoke-contents.htm http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=6891 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabi...ng#Lung_cancer Growing Evidence Of Marijuana Smoke's Potential Dangers http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0805110741.htm . Secondhand Smoke {Kills} Be It : Tobacco or Marijuana http://www.lungusa.org/site/pp.asp?c=dvLUK9O0E&b=35422 . I've been smoking reefer for 42.25 years. When may I expect these ill effects to catch up with me? In about another 42.25 years. I toke at bedtime and ride/run aggressively during the day and breath better than most 25 year olds who smoke cigarettes. My 23 year old grandson used to be able to outrun me for distance when he was 18 but since he has started smoking (and beer) he runs out of breath after about one block or a good 100 yard dash. I really rag on him then since he has been outrun by a 60/61 year old. He still smokes though. Yep, that refined reefer I smoke is really killing my lungs. I do it to remove any strange chemicals that may have found their way in. I started this when the government made a big deal about spraying Paraquat in Mexico so I could get it out of the weed. Bill Baka |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
Nick Danger wrote:
On Oct 2, 1:56 pm, dave wrote: I've been smoking reefer for 42.25 years. When may I expect these ill effects to catch up with me? Um, maybe in one or two or 'x' number of years when you go for a chest x-ray and they say you have lung cancer... Chest X-rays cause lung cancer. |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
~ RHF wrote:
On Oct 2, 1:56 pm, dave wrote: Nick Danger wrote: Pot smoke vs tobacco smoke? Parts is parts and smoke is smoke -- and your lung parts are looking for oxygen, not smoke. Please 'splain how pot smoke can't help but be harmful to your lungs. A real answer please, no tap dancing. - It's a matter of proportion. - Your lungs are insulted less because pot - users inhale smoke less frequently - compared to typical tobacco addicts. Yeah generally Pot Smokers take fewer "Puffs" Daily -verus- typical Tobacco Smokers. But generally Pot Smokers "Puffs" are Inhaled Deeper -verus- typical Tobacco Smokers. Often the result is that Pot Smokers fewer but deeper "Puffs" add-up to the same amount of Smoke-in-the-Lungs as the Tobacco Smokers. That's why I refine the wood matter out. 2 or 3 puffs a day max. The Components of most Smoke from the Burning of Organic Leafy Matter are about the same. http://www.ukcia.org/research/smoke-contents.htm http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=6891 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabi...ng#Lung_cancer Growing Evidence Of Marijuana Smoke's Potential Dangers http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0805110741.htm Bull****. Funded by the government again? What a waste of an article. Pot hurts your DNA? Tobacco hurts it worse, and even the chromosomes? Are smokers going to morph to match their altered DNA? It's a scare tactic concocted by the government. Nothing is going to mess with your DNA in any big way or it would kill you. . Secondhand Smoke {Kills} Be It : Tobacco or Marijuana http://www.lungusa.org/site/pp.asp?c=dvLUK9O0E&b=35422 . Really, really bull**** on this one. I read the article twice and there is no mention of Marijuana at all. Bill Baka |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
Nick Danger wrote:
dave wrote: I've been smoking reefer for 42.25 years. When may I expect these ill effects to catch up with me? Um, maybe in one or two or 'x' number of years when you go for a chest x-ray and they say you have lung cancer... How lucky do you feel? Or does the dope make you not care? It isn't an issue. All of the 60's dopers are now in their 60's and it has not been called any kind of issue yet. The ones who got cancer also smoked tobacco. Many stoners did not drink either and are actually better off for having been stoners. Bill Baka |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
Bob Dobbs wrote:
When I was introduced to the celestial blessings of cannabis in the 60s, it allowed me a preferable alternative to the ethanol that was so woven into the fabric of Southern recreational chemistry. But my most profound appreciation goes to the benevolence of the lysergide experience and how it opened the door to successful riddance of that pernicious monkey of nicotine addiction so firmly dug into my back. It was either quit or share the balcony with Fred Roggin (among others). I chose to quit. |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
I remember the State Times newspaper.For whatever reasons, it didn't
last long, only a few years.Back in the 1960s, the Jackson Daily News merged with the Clarion Ledger.Nowadays, the Clarion Ledger is a Gannet rag. www.clarionledger.com Haw! you should see how thin and skimpy the Clarion Ledger paper newspaper is nowadays, only two sections.Except for the much thicker Sundays Clarion Ledger paper newspapers.I suppose the Thursdays paper newspapers aren't so thin and skimpy, if they still have those food store ads in there? Last Sunday, almost a week ago, I bought a Sunday Clarion Ledger newspaper for $1.75 at a Walgreen's store at McDowell Road and Robinson Road.I still haven't started reading that paper newspaper yet. I am hell when I am well, trouble is, I stay sick all the time! cuhulin |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
On Oct 2, 1:56 pm, dave wrote: I've been smoking reefer for 42.25 years. When may I expect these ill effects to catch up with me? Nick Danger wrote: Um, maybe in one or two or 'x' number of years when you go for a chest x-ray and they say you have lung cancer... dave wrote: Chest X-rays cause lung cancer. And 42 years of smoke doesn't? |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
On Oct 3, 7:43*pm, Nick Danger wrote:
On Oct 2, 1:56 pm, dave wrote: I've been smoking reefer for 42.25 years. *When may I expect these ill effects to catch up with me? Nick Danger wrote: Um, maybe in one or two or 'x' number of years when you go for a chest x-ray and they say you have lung cancer... dave wrote: Chest X-rays cause lung cancer. And 42 years of smoke doesn't? ***Baka's smoking weed and blowing smoke out his @$$...The guy is a total blowhard and and thinks he's an expert on everything...Just ask the buffoon, he'll tell ya everything you need to know...rtflmmfao Baka...Expert on everything and in reality doesn't know jack sh %t...Except how to teach underage girls to climb trees...ehhhhh, Baka...?...Shout out to Distinguished Troll Larbgai for alerting the proper authorities regarding Baka's underage post...Looks like Usenet has found its new class clown...:-) |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
hIts ahh cold raineyish day ober here in Jacksooooonnnn,Me see see pee
pee eye and Earth vs. the Flying Saucers moovi haz started onna teh TCM channel. Yeahhhhhhh,,,,,, cuhulin |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
I just now turned off my Ionic Breeze and I lifted out the thingy that
has the three metal bars.It's Workin,,, it's Workin,,, There is a bunch of grey lookin ash lookin stuff on there.I think it is cigarette ash.I don't care what some people say agains't Ionic Breeze! I Luvs my Ionic Breeze! I am goin to check it again in about twenty four hours.I am goin to tape a little strip of newspaper to the rear grille/vents so I can watch it flappin around. cuhulin |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
Bob Dobbs wrote:
Bill Baka wrote: It isn't an issue. All of the 60's dopers are now in their 60's and it has not been called any kind of issue yet. The ones who got cancer also smoked tobacco. Many stoners did not drink either and are actually better off for having been stoners. Bill Baka When I was introduced to the celestial blessings of cannabis in the 60s, it allowed me a preferable alternative to the ethanol that was so woven into the fabric of Southern recreational chemistry. But my most profound appreciation goes to the benevolence of the lysergide experience and how it opened the door to successful riddance of that pernicious monkey of nicotine addiction so firmly dug into my back. So you missed the Sunday "Love ins, and 'be ins'" of the summer of 1969 in L.A.'s Griffith Park. The LAPD was always there and on those occasions we just bought a gallon jug of Gallo and passed it in a circle. Acid was *not* my thing, having been slipped a full dose sugar cube one time. Bill Baka sipping a soda with yummy "High Fructose Corn Syrup". Read the labels on your food and be scared, be very scared. |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
nurk_fred2000 wrote:
***Baka's smoking weed and blowing smoke out his @$$...The guy is a total blowhard and and thinks he's an expert on everything...Just ask the buffoon, he'll tell ya everything you need to know...rtflmmfao Baka...Expert on everything and in reality doesn't know jack sh %t...Except how to teach underage girls to climb trees...ehhhhh, Baka...?...Shout out to Distinguished Troll Larbgai for alerting the proper authorities regarding Baka's underage post...Looks like Usenet has found its new class clown...:-) And I have found the Illiterati. |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
On Oct 5, 4:51*pm, Bill Baka wrote:
nurk_fred2000 wrote: ***Baka's smoking weed and blowing smoke out his @$$...The guy is a total blowhard and and thinks he's an expert on everything...Just ask the buffoon, he'll tell ya everything you need to know...rtflmmfao Baka...Expert on everything and in reality doesn't know jack sh %t...Except how to teach underage girls to climb trees...ehhhhh, Baka...?...Shout out to Distinguished Troll Larbgai for alerting the proper authorities regarding Baka's underage post...Looks like Usenet has found its new class clown...:-) And I have found the Illiterati. ***You have all the answers Baka...nothing more than a life support system for your rectum...better go tend to your under aged flock...:-) |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
nurk_fred2000 wrote:
On Oct 2, 11:41 am, Bill Baka wrote: Nick Danger wrote: Bill Baka wrote: Alcohol and tobacco have done more damage to my non smoking friends than any amount of Pot smoke could ever do. Pot smoke vs tobacco smoke? Parts is parts and smoke is smoke -- and your lung parts are looking for oxygen, not smoke. Please 'splain how pot smoke can't help but be harmful to your lungs. A real answer please, no tap dancing. A. My second major in college was chemistry. B. I never smoke straight street *dope* since that is for dopes. C. I dissolve out the plant goo from the cellulose that I don't want to smoke. D. I separate out the tar and other stuff like Chlorophyll and and added chemicals to get pure THC. E. If I am ambitious or have plenty of raw material I isomerize the THC cis-trans mix into the active stuff. F. If I am really ambitious I can attach an acetate radical for about 50% greater bio-availability. G. After all this you can't possibly take more than one hit off a bong or smoke more than 2 hits off a joint and still move. H. Therefore it is totally impossible to smoke a pack a day. Satisfied? Actually my second major in college was any and all things scientific. Passing the entrance requirements was 0.0000% of a problem. Bill Baka ***what a Dork!...seperate out the tar and chloryphyll...?...what a croc of sh%t...attatch an acetate radical for a 50% juice to the bio availability...?...wheres your degree from...NYC Elementary...?....now you claim to be an expert Welder...Bwahahaha!...:-) Nurkie, The effects of your STDs on your brain are apparent. Acetylation of a number of biologically active materials can help to increase their bioavailability. Please get an education! |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
John Barnard wrote:
nurk_fred2000 wrote: On Oct 2, 11:41 am, Bill Baka wrote: Nick Danger wrote: Bill Baka wrote: Alcohol and tobacco have done more damage to my non smoking friends than any amount of Pot smoke could ever do. Pot smoke vs tobacco smoke? Parts is parts and smoke is smoke -- and your lung parts are looking for oxygen, not smoke. Please 'splain how pot smoke can't help but be harmful to your lungs. A real answer please, no tap dancing. A. My second major in college was chemistry. B. I never smoke straight street *dope* since that is for dopes. C. I dissolve out the plant goo from the cellulose that I don't want to smoke. D. I separate out the tar and other stuff like Chlorophyll and and added chemicals to get pure THC. E. If I am ambitious or have plenty of raw material I isomerize the THC cis-trans mix into the active stuff. F. If I am really ambitious I can attach an acetate radical for about 50% greater bio-availability. G. After all this you can't possibly take more than one hit off a bong or smoke more than 2 hits off a joint and still move. H. Therefore it is totally impossible to smoke a pack a day. Satisfied? Actually my second major in college was any and all things scientific. Passing the entrance requirements was 0.0000% of a problem. Bill Baka ***what a Dork!...seperate out the tar and chloryphyll...?...what a croc of sh%t...attatch an acetate radical for a 50% juice to the bio availability...?...wheres your degree from...NYC Elementary...?....now you claim to be an expert Welder...Bwahahaha!...:-) Nurkie, The effects of your STDs on your brain are apparent. Acetylation of a number of biologically active materials can help to increase their bioavailability. Please get an education! Well John, It is nice to know there are some intelligent people here. He could have just picked up an allergy medication and read the ingredients to see all the things being ingested. Almost all medications, prescription or not, have a radical of some sort attached. I chew Tums like candy for the Calcium, not the Carbonate that is attached. Benadryl, Diphenhydramine HCl helps me to sleep, thanks to a radical, HCl. I guess Nurk is a write off. Now that I have some of the Nurk's marked I know a bit more about who to talk to on here. I actually wanted to see if this group had anything related to shortwave for my Hammarlund to chase down. I have the speaker output hooked to a 4 channel scope so I would be looking for telemetry or anything unusual. Bill Baka |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
On Oct 5, 6:51*pm, John Barnard wrote:
nurk_fred2000 wrote: On Oct 2, 11:41 am, Bill Baka wrote: Nick Danger wrote: Bill Baka wrote: Alcohol and tobacco have done more damage to my non smoking friends than any amount of Pot smoke could ever do. Pot smoke vs tobacco smoke? Parts is parts and smoke is smoke -- and your lung parts are looking for oxygen, not smoke. Please 'splain how pot smoke can't help but be harmful to your lungs. A real answer please, no tap dancing. A. My second major in college was chemistry. B. I never smoke straight street *dope* since that is for dopes. C. I dissolve out the plant goo from the cellulose that I don't want to smoke. D. I separate out the tar and other stuff like Chlorophyll and and added chemicals to get pure THC. E. If I am ambitious or have plenty of raw material I isomerize the THC cis-trans mix into the active stuff. F. If I am really ambitious I can attach an acetate radical for about 50% greater bio-availability. G. After all this you can't possibly take more than one hit off a bong or smoke more than 2 hits off a joint and still move. H. Therefore it is totally impossible to smoke a pack a day. Satisfied? Actually my second major in college was any and all things scientific. Passing the entrance requirements was 0.0000% of a problem. Bill Baka ***what a Dork!...seperate out the tar and chloryphyll...?...what a croc of sh%t...attatch an acetate radical for a 50% juice to the bio availability...?...wheres your degree from...NYC Elementary...?....now you claim to be an expert Welder...Bwahahaha!...:-) Nurkie, The effects of your STDs on your brain are apparent. Acetylation of a number of biologically active materials can help to increase their bioavailability. Please get an education!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - ***Rock on Barney...are you a druggie?...do you like underage girls?...do you manipulate Class 1 narcotics too?...seems to me you and Baka are pretty chummy...*grin* |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
John Barnard wrote:
nurk_fred2000 wrote: On Oct 2, 11:41 am, Bill Baka wrote: Nick Danger wrote: Bill Baka wrote: Alcohol and tobacco have done more damage to my non smoking friends than any amount of Pot smoke could ever do. Pot smoke vs tobacco smoke? Parts is parts and smoke is smoke -- and your lung parts are looking for oxygen, not smoke. Please 'splain how pot smoke can't help but be harmful to your lungs. A real answer please, no tap dancing. A. My second major in college was chemistry. B. I never smoke straight street *dope* since that is for dopes. C. I dissolve out the plant goo from the cellulose that I don't want to smoke. D. I separate out the tar and other stuff like Chlorophyll and and added chemicals to get pure THC. E. If I am ambitious or have plenty of raw material I isomerize the THC cis-trans mix into the active stuff. F. If I am really ambitious I can attach an acetate radical for about 50% greater bio-availability. G. After all this you can't possibly take more than one hit off a bong or smoke more than 2 hits off a joint and still move. H. Therefore it is totally impossible to smoke a pack a day. Satisfied? Actually my second major in college was any and all things scientific. Passing the entrance requirements was 0.0000% of a problem. Bill Baka ***what a Dork!...seperate out the tar and chloryphyll...?...what a croc of sh%t...attatch an acetate radical for a 50% juice to the bio availability...?...wheres your degree from...NYC Elementary...?....now you claim to be an expert Welder...Bwahahaha!...:-) Nurkie, The effects of your STDs on your brain are apparent. Acetylation of a number of biologically active materials can help to increase their bioavailability. Please get an education! And salts are more stable at room temperature. |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
Bill Baka wrote:
E. If I am ambitious or have plenty of raw material I isomerize the THC cis-trans mix into the active stuff. F. If I am really ambitious I can attach an acetate radical for about 50% greater bio-availability. "isomerize"?, "cis-trans", "bio-availability"? That certainly is a lot of techno-babble to rationalize an illegal activity and to justify being a doper/druggie. You ridicule others for being addicted to tobacco and alcohol while you seem to be equally addicted to that drug monkey on -your- back. Pot - Kettle - Black On the other hand, it may be good that you are here. The group just might need a new hypocrite now that Telaturd is gone. |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
Salt? I put salt on everything.My Grandpappy used to sprinkle sugar on
everything. cuhulin |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
On Oct 6, 10:53*am, wrote:
Salt? I put salt on everything.My Grandpappy used to sprinkle sugar on everything. cuhulin LOL cuhulin...Baka sprinkles his feces on everything...just look at this ng and its pretty evident the guy's got it leaking out every orifice...sure wish he'd disappear up his own orifice, ehhh Baka...?...*grin, sh%t eatin style* |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
Bob Dobbs wrote:
Bill Baka wrote: So you missed the Sunday "Love ins, and 'be ins'" of the summer of 1969 in L.A.'s Griffith Park. Summer of 69 it was Volunteer Park, or occasionally Ravenna Park. Nowadays it's Balboa Park. San Diego? It all went to hell in 1970 after the police decided to crack down on all the illegal immigrants (Musicians from Canada and France). 1969 was a good year, Woodstock, land on the moon, freedom. USA 1969. I wonder where that country went??? Bill Baka |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
Nick Danger wrote:
Bill Baka wrote: E. If I am ambitious or have plenty of raw material I isomerize the THC cis-trans mix into the active stuff. F. If I am really ambitious I can attach an acetate radical for about 50% greater bio-availability. "isomerize"?, "cis-trans", "bio-availability"? That certainly is a lot of techno-babble to rationalize an illegal activity and to justify being a doper/druggie. While you have the right to agree with Nurk I will tell you that is not techno babble. Food labels are required to list trans-fats and the cis-tran is just a mirror image of the molecule as far as techno babble. You ridicule others for being addicted to tobacco and alcohol while you seem to be equally addicted to that drug monkey on -your- back. Pot - Kettle - Black I'm not addicted to it but it does help me sleep. I have some kind of insomnia that the doctors can't figure out and the pot is more effective and less harmful than the prescription drug to help me sleep. The doctor even suggested I join a medical pot club. On the other hand, it may be good that you are here. The group just might need a new hypocrite now that Telaturd is gone. I just decided to come in with a bang since this group had nothing going on when I came into it. It just amazes me that people are so hung up on this pot thing when the legal stuff does so much more harm. Bill Baka |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
Bob Dobbs wrote:
Bill Baka wrote: Bob Dobbs wrote: Bill Baka wrote: So you missed the Sunday "Love ins, and 'be ins'" of the summer of 1969 in L.A.'s Griffith Park. Summer of 69 it was Volunteer Park, or occasionally Ravenna Park. Nowadays it's Balboa Park. San Diego? Yep and the first two were in Seattle It all went to hell in 1970 after the police decided to crack down on all the illegal immigrants (Musicians from Canada and France). Footnote* - Carlos Santana got his start just over the border in downtown Tijuana's Parque Teniente Guerrero. Double Footnote; My barber was Carlos Santana's father. I used to get my hair cut and he would tell me about his son's latest exploits. I never met Carlos, though, even though his dad said he did stop in once in a while. 1969 was a good year, Woodstock, land on the moon, freedom. USA 1969. Marked my exodus from many years spent in the deep south to an eventual destination of Seattle. I wonder where that country went??? Still looking for it myself. Amen. Bill Baka |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
Bob Dobbs wrote:
Bill Baka wrote: I wonder where that country went??? Still looking for it myself. “ Strange memories on this nervous night in Las Vegas. Five years later? Six? It seems like a lifetime, or at least a Main Era — the kind of peak that never comes again. San Francisco in the middle sixties was a very special time and place to be a part of. Maybe it meant something. Maybe not, in the long run . . . but no explanation, no mix of words or music or memories can touch that sense of knowing that you were there and alive in that corner of time and the world. Whatever it meant. . . . History is hard to know, because of all the hired bull****, but even without being sure of “history” it seems entirely reasonable to think that every now and then the energy of a whole generation comes to a head in a long fine flash, for reasons that nobody really understands at the time — and which never explain, in retrospect, what actually happened. My central memory of that time seems to hang on one or five or maybe forty nights — or very early mornings — when I left the Fillmore half-crazy and, instead of going home, aimed the big 650 Lightning across the Bay Bridge at a hundred miles an hour wearing L. L. Bean shorts and a Butte sheepherder's jacket . . . booming through the Treasure Island tunnel at the lights of Oakland and Berkeley and Richmond, not quite sure which turn-off to take when I got to the other end (always stalling at the toll-gate, too twisted to find neutral while I fumbled for change) . . . but being absolutely certain that no matter which way I went I would come to a place where people were just as high and wild as I was: No doubt at all about that. . . . There was madness in any direction, at any hour. If not across the Bay, then up the Golden Gate or down 101 to Los Altos or La Honda. . . . You could strike sparks anywhere. There was a fantastic universal sense that whatever we were doing was right, that we were winning. . . . And that, I think, was the handle—that sense of inevitable victory over the forces of Old and Evil. Not in any mean or military sense; we didn’t need that. Our energy would simply prevail. There was no point in fighting — on our side or theirs. We had all the momentum; we were riding the crest of a high and beautiful wave. . . . So now, less than five years later, you can go up on a steep hill in Las Vegas and look West, and with the right kind of eyes you can almost see the high-water mark — that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back." -HST |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
San Francisco,,, Open them Golden Gates! I spent four days and nights at
Oakland Army Terminal/Base in the first few days of January 1964.I used to catch a bus from Oakland to San Francisco.One time, in San Francisco, going across Treasure Island, (whatever happened to Robot Wars which used to be on tv? I Love that show!) I walked into a store and I started looking at a soft back book of black and white photos of naked women, I was only twenty three years old, still young and innocent. Onother time in San Francisco, a woman two or three storeys up in a building, she wolf whistled out the window at me.I kept on walking down the street. cuhulin |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
|
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
dave wrote:
Bob Dobbs wrote: Bill Baka wrote: I wonder where that country went??? Still looking for it myself. “ Strange memories on this nervous night in Las Vegas. Five years later? Six? It seems like a lifetime, or at least a Main Era — the kind of peak that never comes again. San Francisco in the middle sixties was a very special time and place to be a part of. Maybe it meant something. Maybe not, in the long run . . . but no explanation, no mix of words or music or memories can touch that sense of knowing that you were there and alive in that corner of time and the world. Whatever it meant. . . . History is hard to know, because of all the hired bull****, but even without being sure of “history” it seems entirely reasonable to think that every now and then the energy of a whole generation comes to a head in a long fine flash, for reasons that nobody really understands at the time — and which never explain, in retrospect, what actually happened. My central memory of that time seems to hang on one or five or maybe forty nights — or very early mornings — when I left the Fillmore half-crazy and, instead of going home, aimed the big 650 Lightning across the Bay Bridge at a hundred miles an hour wearing L. L. Bean shorts and a Butte sheepherder's jacket . . . booming through the Treasure Island tunnel at the lights of Oakland and Berkeley and Richmond, not quite sure which turn-off to take when I got to the other end (always stalling at the toll-gate, too twisted to find neutral while I fumbled for change) . . . but being absolutely certain that no matter which way I went I would come to a place where people were just as high and wild as I was: No doubt at all about that. . . . There was madness in any direction, at any hour. If not across the Bay, then up the Golden Gate or down 101 to Los Altos or La Honda. . . . You could strike sparks anywhere. There was a fantastic universal sense that whatever we were doing was right, that we were winning. . . . And that, I think, was the handle—that sense of inevitable victory over the forces of Old and Evil. Not in any mean or military sense; we didn’t need that. Our energy would simply prevail. There was no point in fighting — on our side or theirs. We had all the momentum; we were riding the crest of a high and beautiful wave. . . . So now, less than five years later, you can go up on a steep hill in Las Vegas and look West, and with the right kind of eyes you can almost see the high-water mark — that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back." -HST That pretty well describes it, except I had a 1968 Rambler so I could carry a porta-party and it got 22 MPG at 120 MPH all the way down to Tijuana. I had my 'Cougar' with me. It was kind of nice being her sex toy since I never had to worry about getting laid. She was a major horn dog and almost made me at 20 look 'not horny enough'. Damn, I miss the 60's. Bill Baka |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
On Oct 7, 8:42*pm, Bill Baka wrote:
dave wrote: Bob Dobbs wrote: Bill Baka wrote: I wonder where that country went??? Still looking for it myself. “ Strange memories on this nervous night in Las Vegas. Five years later? Six? It seems like a lifetime, or at least a Main Era — the kind of peak that never comes again. San Francisco in the middle sixties was a very special time and place to be a part of. Maybe it meant something. Maybe not, in the long run . . . but no explanation, no mix of words or music or memories can touch that sense of knowing that you were there and alive in that corner of time and the world. Whatever it meant. . . . History is hard to know, because of all the hired bull****, but even without being sure of “history” it seems entirely reasonable to think that every now and then the energy of a whole generation comes to a head in a long fine flash, for reasons that nobody really understands at the time — and which never explain, in retrospect, what actually happened.. My central memory of that time seems to hang on one or five or maybe forty nights — or very early mornings — when I left the Fillmore half-crazy and, instead of going home, aimed the big 650 Lightning across the Bay Bridge at a hundred miles an hour wearing L. L. Bean shorts and a Butte sheepherder's jacket . . . booming through the Treasure Island tunnel at the lights of Oakland and Berkeley and Richmond, not quite sure which turn-off to take when I got to the other end (always stalling at the toll-gate, too twisted to find neutral while I fumbled for change) . . . but being absolutely certain that no matter which way I went I would come to a place where people were just as high and wild as I was: No doubt at all about that. . . . There was madness in any direction, at any hour. If not across the Bay, then up the Golden Gate or down 101 to Los Altos or La Honda. . . . You could strike sparks anywhere. There was a fantastic universal sense that whatever we were doing was right, that we were winning. . . . And that, I think, was the handle—that sense of inevitable victory over the forces of Old and Evil. Not in any mean or military sense; we didn’t need that. Our energy would simply prevail. There was no point in fighting — on our side or theirs. We had all the momentum; we were riding the crest of a high and beautiful wave. . . . So now, less than five years later, you can go up on a steep hill in Las Vegas and look West, and with the right kind of eyes you can almost see the high-water mark — that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back." *-HST That pretty well describes it, except I had a 1968 Rambler so I could carry a porta-party and it got 22 MPG at 120 MPH all the way down to Tijuana. I had my 'Cougar' with me. It was kind of nice being her sex toy since I never had to worry about getting laid. She was a major horn dog and almost made me at 20 look 'not horny enough'. Damn, I miss the 60's. Bill Baka- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - ***How young was she Baka...16...?...*grin, sh%t eatin style" |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
Krypsis wrote:
nurk_fred2000 wrote: On Oct 7, 8:42 pm, Bill Baka wrote: dave wrote: Bob Dobbs wrote: Bill Baka wrote: I wonder where that country went??? Still looking for it myself. “ Strange memories on this nervous night in Las Vegas. Five years later? Six? It seems like a lifetime, or at least a Main Era — the kind of peak that never comes again. San Francisco in the middle sixties was a very special time and place to be a part of. Maybe it meant something. Maybe not, in the long run . . . but no explanation, no mix of words or music or memories can touch that sense of knowing that you were there and alive in that corner of time and the world. Whatever it meant. . . . History is hard to know, because of all the hired bull****, but even without being sure of “history” it seems entirely reasonable to think that every now and then the energy of a whole generation comes to a head in a long fine flash, for reasons that nobody really understands at the time — and which never explain, in retrospect, what actually happened.. My central memory of that time seems to hang on one or five or maybe forty nights — or very early mornings — when I left the Fillmore half-crazy and, instead of going home, aimed the big 650 Lightning across the Bay Bridge at a hundred miles an hour wearing L. L. Bean shorts and a Butte sheepherder's jacket . . . booming through the Treasure Island tunnel at the lights of Oakland and Berkeley and Richmond, not quite sure which turn-off to take when I got to the other end (always stalling at the toll-gate, too twisted to find neutral while I fumbled for change) . . . but being absolutely certain that no matter which way I went I would come to a place where people were just as high and wild as I was: No doubt at all about that. . . . There was madness in any direction, at any hour. If not across the Bay, then up the Golden Gate or down 101 to Los Altos or La Honda. . . . You could strike sparks anywhere. There was a fantastic universal sense that whatever we were doing was right, that we were winning. . . . And that, I think, was the handle—that sense of inevitable victory over the forces of Old and Evil. Not in any mean or military sense; we didn’t need that. Our energy would simply prevail. There was no point in fighting — on our side or theirs. We had all the momentum; we were riding the crest of a high and beautiful wave. . . . So now, less than five years later, you can go up on a steep hill in Las Vegas and look West, and with the right kind of eyes you can almost see the high-water mark — that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back." -HST That pretty well describes it, except I had a 1968 Rambler so I could carry a porta-party and it got 22 MPG at 120 MPH all the way down to Tijuana. I had my 'Cougar' with me. It was kind of nice being her sex toy since I never had to worry about getting laid. She was a major horn dog and almost made me at 20 look 'not horny enough'. Damn, I miss the 60's. Bill Baka- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - ***How young was she Baka...16...?...*grin, sh%t eatin style" Will someone please explain to Nurk what a cougar is! He is quite obviously too stupid to know! Krypsis That much is obvious! My 'Cougar' was about 38 and the horniest woman I have ever known. I lived with her and her 18 year old daughter for about 6 months. They supported me in fine style. Cougar worked nights as a bar maid and daughter worked days in a head shop on Sunset Strip during the days. The 18 year old was my target but I wound up double-dipping, legally. Be jealous Nurk, be *very* jealous. 1969, for me, was just about an all time peak year. Viet Nam? Draft? College? Nope. Took the year off to get laid, laid, and laid some more. Poor Nurk must be a frustrated *Virgin*. Bill Baka |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
Bill Baka wrote:
John Barnard wrote: nurk_fred2000 wrote: On Oct 2, 11:41 am, Bill Baka wrote: Nick Danger wrote: Bill Baka wrote: Alcohol and tobacco have done more damage to my non smoking friends than any amount of Pot smoke could ever do. Pot smoke vs tobacco smoke? Parts is parts and smoke is smoke -- and your lung parts are looking for oxygen, not smoke. Please 'splain how pot smoke can't help but be harmful to your lungs. A real answer please, no tap dancing. A. My second major in college was chemistry. B. I never smoke straight street *dope* since that is for dopes. C. I dissolve out the plant goo from the cellulose that I don't want to smoke. D. I separate out the tar and other stuff like Chlorophyll and and added chemicals to get pure THC. E. If I am ambitious or have plenty of raw material I isomerize the THC cis-trans mix into the active stuff. F. If I am really ambitious I can attach an acetate radical for about 50% greater bio-availability. G. After all this you can't possibly take more than one hit off a bong or smoke more than 2 hits off a joint and still move. H. Therefore it is totally impossible to smoke a pack a day. Satisfied? Actually my second major in college was any and all things scientific. Passing the entrance requirements was 0.0000% of a problem. Bill Baka ***what a Dork!...seperate out the tar and chloryphyll...?...what a croc of sh%t...attatch an acetate radical for a 50% juice to the bio availability...?...wheres your degree from...NYC Elementary...?....now you claim to be an expert Welder...Bwahahaha!...:-) Nurkie, The effects of your STDs on your brain are apparent. Acetylation of a number of biologically active materials can help to increase their bioavailability. Please get an education! Well John, It is nice to know there are some intelligent people here. He could have just picked up an allergy medication and read the ingredients to see all the things being ingested. Almost all medications, prescription or not, have a radical of some sort attached. I chew Tums like candy for the Calcium, not the Carbonate that is attached. Benadryl, Diphenhydramine HCl helps me to sleep, thanks to a radical, HCl. I guess Nurk is a write off. Now that I have some of the Nurk's marked I know a bit more about who to talk to on here. I actually wanted to see if this group had anything related to shortwave for my Hammarlund to chase down. I have the speaker output hooked to a 4 channel scope so I would be looking for telemetry or anything unusual. Bill Baka Hi Bill, I was in the Pharma industry for over 10 years. I've got one that finished an expanded Phase II in California and Thailand (UC781) and should hit market one of these years (5 years would be my guess) and have been involved with Phase III trials with another drug so I know a little bit ;-) about pharmaceuticals. It's good to see that someone else has a chem. background here. Cheers! John B. |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
nurk_fred2000 wrote:
On Oct 5, 6:51 pm, John Barnard wrote: nurk_fred2000 wrote: On Oct 2, 11:41 am, Bill Baka wrote: Nick Danger wrote: Bill Baka wrote: Alcohol and tobacco have done more damage to my non smoking friends than any amount of Pot smoke could ever do. Pot smoke vs tobacco smoke? Parts is parts and smoke is smoke -- and your lung parts are looking for oxygen, not smoke. Please 'splain how pot smoke can't help but be harmful to your lungs. A real answer please, no tap dancing. A. My second major in college was chemistry. B. I never smoke straight street *dope* since that is for dopes. C. I dissolve out the plant goo from the cellulose that I don't want to smoke. D. I separate out the tar and other stuff like Chlorophyll and and added chemicals to get pure THC. E. If I am ambitious or have plenty of raw material I isomerize the THC cis-trans mix into the active stuff. F. If I am really ambitious I can attach an acetate radical for about 50% greater bio-availability. G. After all this you can't possibly take more than one hit off a bong or smoke more than 2 hits off a joint and still move. H. Therefore it is totally impossible to smoke a pack a day. Satisfied? Actually my second major in college was any and all things scientific. Passing the entrance requirements was 0.0000% of a problem. Bill Baka ***what a Dork!...seperate out the tar and chloryphyll...?...what a croc of sh%t...attatch an acetate radical for a 50% juice to the bio availability...?...wheres your degree from...NYC Elementary...?....now you claim to be an expert Welder...Bwahahaha!...:-) Nurkie, The effects of your STDs on your brain are apparent. Acetylation of a number of biologically active materials can help to increase their bioavailability. Please get an education!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - ***Rock on Barney...are you a druggie?...do you like underage girls?...do you manipulate Class 1 narcotics too?...seems to me you and Baka are pretty chummy...*grin* I like you Nurkie - you're wrong all the time! You really need to quit being so envious of people with an education and try to get one yourself. I've managed controlled materials with the government's blessings - I doubt any government would ever give you that okay. JB |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
dave wrote:
John Barnard wrote: nurk_fred2000 wrote: On Oct 2, 11:41 am, Bill Baka wrote: Nick Danger wrote: Bill Baka wrote: Alcohol and tobacco have done more damage to my non smoking friends than any amount of Pot smoke could ever do. Pot smoke vs tobacco smoke? Parts is parts and smoke is smoke -- and your lung parts are looking for oxygen, not smoke. Please 'splain how pot smoke can't help but be harmful to your lungs. A real answer please, no tap dancing. A. My second major in college was chemistry. B. I never smoke straight street *dope* since that is for dopes. C. I dissolve out the plant goo from the cellulose that I don't want to smoke. D. I separate out the tar and other stuff like Chlorophyll and and added chemicals to get pure THC. E. If I am ambitious or have plenty of raw material I isomerize the THC cis-trans mix into the active stuff. F. If I am really ambitious I can attach an acetate radical for about 50% greater bio-availability. G. After all this you can't possibly take more than one hit off a bong or smoke more than 2 hits off a joint and still move. H. Therefore it is totally impossible to smoke a pack a day. Satisfied? Actually my second major in college was any and all things scientific. Passing the entrance requirements was 0.0000% of a problem. Bill Baka ***what a Dork!...seperate out the tar and chloryphyll...?...what a croc of sh%t...attatch an acetate radical for a 50% juice to the bio availability...?...wheres your degree from...NYC Elementary...?....now you claim to be an expert Welder...Bwahahaha!...:-) Nurkie, The effects of your STDs on your brain are apparent. Acetylation of a number of biologically active materials can help to increase their bioavailability. Please get an education! And salts are more stable at room temperature. It's often easier to recrystallize the salts to increase their purity. From an industrial point-of-view this easier to do than trying other methods of purification. |
Pot Heads @ Rec dot Radio Shortwave, UNITE!!!!
On Oct 6, 3:41*pm, dave wrote:
Bob Dobbs wrote: Bill Baka wrote: I wonder where that country went??? Still looking for it myself. “ Strange memories on this nervous night in Las Vegas. Five years later? Six? It seems like a lifetime, or at least a Main Era — the kind of peak that never comes again. San Francisco in the middle sixties was a very special time and place to be a part of. Maybe it meant something. Maybe not, in the long run . . . but no explanation, no mix of words or music or memories can touch that sense of knowing that you were there and alive in that corner of time and the world. Whatever it meant. . . . History is hard to know, because of all the hired bull****, but even without being sure of “history” it seems entirely reasonable to think that every now and then the energy of a whole generation comes to a head in a long fine flash, for reasons that nobody really understands at the time — and which never explain, in retrospect, what actually happened. My central memory of that time seems to hang on one or five or maybe forty nights — or very early mornings — when I left the Fillmore half-crazy and, instead of going home, aimed the big 650 Lightning across the Bay Bridge at a hundred miles an hour wearing L. L. Bean shorts and a Butte sheepherder's jacket . . . booming through the Treasure Island tunnel at the lights of Oakland and Berkeley and Richmond, not quite sure which turn-off to take when I got to the other end (always stalling at the toll-gate, too twisted to find neutral while I fumbled for change) . . . but being absolutely certain that no matter which way I went I would come to a place where people were just as high and wild as I was: No doubt at all about that. . . . There was madness in any direction, at any hour. If not across the Bay, then up the Golden Gate or down 101 to Los Altos or La Honda. . . . You could strike sparks anywhere. There was a fantastic universal sense that whatever we were doing was right, that we were winning. . . . And that, I think, was the handle—that sense of inevitable victory over the forces of Old and Evil. Not in any mean or military sense; we didn’t need that. Our energy would simply prevail. There was no point in fighting — on our side or theirs. We had all the momentum; we were riding the crest of a high and beautiful wave. . . . So now, less than five years later, you can go up on a steep hill in Las Vegas and look West, and with the right kind of eyes you can almost see the high-water mark — that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back." * -HST [HST] Hunter S. Thompson -circa- 1972 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear_an...g_in_Las_Vegas |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com