On Sep 7, 2:40*am, Ross Archer wrote:
On Sep 6, 7:50*pm, "Chas. Chan" wrote:





American news outlets (well at least those not in Barack Obama's lap)
are filled with criticism on the Department of Education plans to
bring Obama's agenda into our nation's classrooms. The ploy to reach
and teach our children through a presidential speech and through
instruction guides (little red books?) appears to be stalled for now
as parents -- if nor educational unions -- resist the idea of brain-
swaying our children into writing paeans to Obama and his agenda.
However, few have wondered how such an idea ever emerged in the first
place. We do have some clues and they are unsettling.

I have previously reported that this idea of inculcating revolutionary
goals in our children's minds stems from the philosophy of Bill Ayers,
Obama's friend, collaborator, and campaign supporter. But Obama's
ideological mentors appear to reach farther back to an influential
radical Italian communist, Antonio Gramsci.

[...]

A cadre of like-minded educators and national service administrators
across the country share the same core commitment to transforming
themselves from imparters of knowledge to transformers of society. The
"change" agenda trains students to think only about what they should
do for Obama -- and rarely to contemplate how his powers and ambitions
should be limited and restrained.

[Bill] Ayers preached his education-as-"social justice" agenda to his
"comrades" at the World Education Forum in Caracas, Venezuela, three
years ago:

"This is my fourth visit to Venezuela, each time at the invitation of
my comrade and friend Luis Bonilla, a brilliant educator and inspiring
fighter for justice. Luis has taught me a great deal about the
Bolivarian Revolution and about the profound educational reforms
underway here in Venezuela under the leadership of President [Hugo]
Chavez. We share the belief that education is the motor-force of
revolution, and I've come to appreciate Luis as a major asset in both
the Venezuelan and the international struggle -- I look forward to
seeing how he and all of you continue to overcome the failings of
capitalist education as you seek to create something truly new and
deeply humane."

[...]

Who was Gramsci? *He was a leader of the Communist party of Italy who
called upon "intellectuals" to produce hegemony over society through
control of education; he viewed schools as an apparatus that radicals
can use to radicalize the young and turn them into communists. He had
a long-term approach, realizing that it may take years of a "long
march through institutions" to train a proper Communist.

Americans versed in Obama Studies may recognize the name of Gramsci.
He has inspired not just the tyrant of Caracas but also inspires the
man in the Oval Office.

[...]

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...ing_bunch.html

What a load of superheated hot air.

Obama's message will be to stay in school, apply yourself
academically, work hard, and graduate.
And to explain the importance of washing hands to limit the spread of
H1N1 flu.

There's no evidence in the man's past speeches or behavior to indicate
any rational reason for concern that Barack Obama's speech will be any
more slanted or political than when Ronald Reagan or George H. W. Bush
spoke to school children.

This "indoctrination" nonsense is *paranoia and crazy lunatic fringe
talk, pure and simple.

Get used it it: *America has moved back towards the political center.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Would that it were the "lunatic fringe." Unfortunately, the organized
opposition to any initiative by the duly elected president of the
United States is the entire Republican Party. The Party leaders
openly seek to block the president from succeeding at anything, from
healthcare to education. They even brag about it, openly
indoctrinating their children to close their ears to anything the
national leader has to say. Republicans have announced they are no
longer part of the democratic nation, no longer Americans, they are
Republicans.

The Republicans can ignore national needs and concentrate on the needs
of their financial backers, the big insurance companies, the profanely
wealthy international captialists, the oil companies, and the drug
dealers. As a result, the Republican Party is the lavishly funded
reactionary--even revolutionary--party, hell bent on gaining power
through sabotage, the American people be damned.