On Oct 29, 10:06*pm, RHF wrote:
On Oct 29, 3:40*pm, Ima wrote:



On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:32:19 -0700,RHFwrote:
On Oct 28, 1:55*pm, Ima wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:36:15 -0700,RHFwrote:

Spoken like a true republiCAN'T.
* *Can't get enough killing in, can you?

What is your definition (or Ru$h's ) on winning thewarin afganistan?

Who will surrender? Who has to die to claim victory?

- Ru$h and the GOP are in favor of the believes - of Al-Qaeda and the
Taliban.

Absurd [.]

- They share a common goal of destroying america!

Absurd [.]

Saw it for myself! *Rush and the GOP leaders saying "they have the same
goal as Al-Qaeda and the Taliban", "the downfall ofObamaand the united
states". *It's all over the internet. funny with all the links you have
in you ****bag, you neglect these.

- Which part of 'candidate' Obama's claim that
- Afghanistan was theWar{We} the USA should
- be fighting : Did you not understand ?
- AFGHANISTAN IT'S PREZOBAMA'SBLOODYWAR
-
- Which part of PrezObama'sstatements as
- the US President about the need to Fight and
- Win in Afghanistan : Did you not understand ?
- AFGHANISTAN IT'S PREZ OBAMA'S BLOODY WAR !
- *.

Prez Obama Wants Afghanistan War 'Options' Changed :
No More Troops & Rapid Exist Strategy
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091112/...afghanistan_33
Prez Obama Says NO to his own hand-picked
National Security Team {The Experts}
* NO to the DoD and the Generals
* NO to the State Department
-but- Yes to his Nobel Peace Prize
-translation- Turn Tail and Run
-result- Prez Obama's Indecision and Inaction
will Insure that the Afghanistan War Will Be Lost
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...3223f439fd1784
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...74ff1afedc6bac
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...b583733e6376e3