| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
D. Peter Maus wrote:
Yeah, actually, it does. The digital system is virtually a separate system, requiring separate transmitters and towers. No, actually it doesn't. Or at least it usually doesn't require a new transmitter. As long as the existing transmitter has an extra 10% of power headroom to overcome combiner losses, you can do high-level combining and you do not need a new transmitter (or tower). If you have to buy a new transmitter then of course the cost goes way up but you still don't need a new tower. They are not separate systems, either virtually or in reality. No stations at all would be broadcasting HD if it required separate transmitters and towers. John can answer the question as to how many stations have transmitters with that 10% of headroom, but apparently many do. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| JUMP TEAM RADIO OPERATORS NEEDED | Policy | |||
| Texas Balloon Launch Team (BLT) to fly ham radio and GPS this saturday 10a | Digital | |||
| Texas Balloon Launch Team (BLT) to fly ham radio and GPS thiss... | Scanner | |||
| Amateur Radio BPL Team to Stress Credibility | Shortwave | |||