Setting up Rush Limbaugh?
If you were a Democrat that wanted to establish a world wide communist
empire, and it drove you crazy that black athletes, in the national
football league, were making millions of dollars, and your whole
political campaign was fueled by the support of black citizens, how
would you go about taking away the “bling bling” of NFL superstars
without hurting their feelings?

Is it just too convenient that Mr. Soros happens to be on the scene,
and a mysterious invitation to bid on the team occurs? Just because
you are black, does that mean that you support black citizens? Ask the
black slave traders in Africa that sold their community out?

So the Rev Wind Mistaken comes on the scene, and Congresswoman Sheila
Jackson gets in on the action, which I look forward to discussing
later (I have enough for now), and they all start screaming about how
Rush Limbaugh doe not unify people, and should not be in the NFL.

So our highly educated con artist, Shiela Jackson Lee, is trying to
tell us that American politics is meant to unify people? Well, if that
was true, why is there voting? Why is there a voting process at all if
we are supposed to just get along, and not say anything that might
offend somebody?

That insults my intelligence Shiela Jackson Lee, that might be fine
for your congressional district where almost 70 percent of your voters
are high school drop outs, but not me? So how do you get the bling
bling of a NFL superstar without making it obvious?

I know, lets set Rush Limbaugh up to buy a football team, and then
make it obvious that he will get treated unfairly, and make his
listeners mad enough to boycott the sport? We will just whisper in
Rush Limbaugh's ear, that this was all just about the national players
association negotiations coming up?

We know that Rush will remind people on a constant basis how he was
treated, and after a year or two, the NFL will not be able to pay
these Black Negro athletes their high salaries, and we can start
chopping them down? Guess who will get the blame, Rush Limbaugh, or
the Democrats or puppet masters that set this up?

It's kind of clever, if you look at it like that? They think he is a
lovable fuzz ball, and will not take on the lies spread about him,
he's rich, the slander really won't hurt him, but allowing the slander
to exist will allow all those black drop outs out there to believe the
hype, and not ever want to listen to Rush Limbaugh in the future, and
censor him, they won't have to lift a finger, all they have to do is
count on Rush being lazy?

That's why they don't want people listening to Rush Limbaugh, because
I guarantee you, after six months, if you listen to National Public
Rip Off Radio, you will see exactly what the agenda is? That's why
they jump at the chance to remind the black folk out there not to
listen to him? He's rich, why is he going to spend his personal time
suing people?

Well, here's your chance Rush, they gave you the head of the "baptist
of poverty" on a silver platter, after an exotic dance? By denying you
the opportunity to buy the team, you have what, damages? Mr. Trump
should hire Mr. Soros, he if he is that smart, or should he be wary of
Mr. Soros because he is that devious?

So what could happen now? If Rush does not sue, I believe that
millions of young, smart, Black Negroes will not hear the greatest
conservative commentator of all time, who can explain the game just
like McMadden did, and that commentator was the only reason I watched
football, he made it interesting, he made it more than just passing a
ball up and down the field?

This is almost as devious as the Michael Savage connection, did
Britain really ban the guy from going into Britain, or is he really a
liberal buddy of theirs and they want to prop him up with ratings? Is
it a big deal to get banned from Britain, if they banned rock stars
from having a doobie, or whatever, which is a minor crime, from being
banned, are we supposed to wonder why it is important that the issue
is about him?

Are liberals in Britain are testing their policies of taking away the
freedoms of their citizens, asking Michael Savage how to get them done
in America, is America next, under the progressive planned
"improvements" or "change"? Why else would you hide an alleged “banned
in Britain policy” without explanation? Liberals tell on themselves,
sometimes by not saying anything?

An example of a “change” that liberals want, but conservatives do not,
Shiela, ask yourself if it is an improvement that if you loose your
job, and you can't get another one that pays the same, and you just
happen to have an older house, you won't be able to sell the house
until improvements are made that may cost thousands of dollars, after
you just tried to weather a famine of unemployment? This is just one
example of several planned outrageous plans of the liberals designed
to unify us? Just shut up Rush?

They are counting on Rush Limbaugh not to sue, and to shrug this off
as political maneuvering related to player salary negotiations, when
it is meant to get the NFL players out of the way, because they will
not be allowed to keep their salaries under this new "change" for
America?

Think Rev Wind Mistaken is not going to take to the streets, and claim
that everyone should be able to get season tickets to a stadium, even
if they don't work? One more thing, since this author, and creator of
this website, is a student of the Center for Advanced Conservative
Studies, when will I get my diploma?

Should I get my diploma after receiving the amount of compensation
from conservative writing that equals one million dollars? What do you
think Rush? Should I ask MR. Fox News Talking Points (which this
website does not copy)? Are you ready to go super sonic now? All
right, afterburner, engage.....

Being that this is the most powerful keyboard in the world, that may
work one day for Donald Trump, or Glenn Beck, or Rush Limbaugh, or for
you the audience, you have to ask yourself a question, is revving wind
a fart, and if you do that, ....

do you feel lucky?

Well do ya mmm mmm mmmm?

Universal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.4, dated Oct
10th, 2009

a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all
electronic forms of communication are not representative of
advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the
messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own
risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to
transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved,
including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function
of the website, and may or may not be archived. No personal
information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided
to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and,
or, individuals concerned.

b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in
various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to
any third parties to share or provide private personal information who
may operate as part of the internet communications system, including
all parties, who may technically intercept communications due to the
nature of network conditions beyond both the author's legal and
physical control, unless those communications represent violations of
the law, upon which the author, and or web site will cooperate to
pursue any legal remedies.

c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain
factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views
may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called
a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical,
grammer, or other technical communication problems not realized or
imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing
information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment
purposes only, and not as a definitive judgement on the actions,
character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of
individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of
people, and not the general public, however no distribution
restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright
Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all
commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to
remain the sole possesion of the original author.

d) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be
designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse
examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas
that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are proven
to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit, disparage
or demean any person or entities in any professional or personal
manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion of the
author, for which it is expected that you read at your own risk, with
no liability held to the author or any third parties who may store,
transfer, or forward this message to others, in the traditions of free
speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in a society that
believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals having sex, and
other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or that the use of
abortion to limit Negros, Latinos, and other races from "spreading the
wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which the author does not
condone).

e)The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable
moments, and to validate and even demonstrate artistic expressions
that are not shared by others, as demonstrated by many valuable
scientific observations that were scoffed at in the past, yet proven
to be quite valid decades later, upon which the humor used in all
electronic communications by the author are based, in the principals
and traditions of free speech and pursuit of happiness, and may not be
a representation of others, including God.

f) Additional use of automated anonymous page use tracking computer
scripts (web page programs) may be licensed by www.google.com, for
bandwidth verification or potential advertisement opportunities or
incorporation of web master tools in the future.

g) Advertisements that may appear are not necessarily endorsed by the
author, either by admission, or by silence, nor are related links,
that may be provided for all or any of the following known or unknown
purposes, but not limited to, informational, educational, and for the
purpose of giving copy right credit referal information under the
terms outlined in the conditions applied to the term "fair use"
regarding conversations and print under US Copy Right Law.

h) It is the opinion of the author that effective 1 December, 2009,
the proposed regulations from the FTC violate the first and fifth
amendments of the United States Constitution, by infringing through
economic affliction the burden without compensation all financial
details concerning the communications of both free enterprise and
opinion, and other civil rights such as "punishment must be fair" and
not at the "discretion" of public officials, or that advertisers are
assumed to be guilty of deception when United States law provides that
you are innocent before being proven guilty, and are in fact
demonstrations that there are current members of Congress that neither
understand the spirit of the law our founding fathers made for the
United States of America, or understand how they work in the opinion
of the author, as of October 10th, 2009, especially in light of
anticipated, and hopefully defeated, legislative taxes relating to
energy use and the burden of publishers and advertisers to comply with
the law and manage the environment, and in light that there are
various consumer protection agencies, including the Better Business
Bureau, which has free consumer information.

i)Although the content provided meets or exceeds those new
requirements to the knowledge of the author, and modifications to
version 1.3 of this disclaimer is a result of the opinion of the
author that blogging is another definition for a potentially infinite
number or forms of electronic communication, as such the author will
retroactively apply this version, 1.4 to all forms of previous
communications, when and wherever possible, as time allows, in order
to properly convey the intention of the author and to demonstrate an
enthusiasm to comply with the law, and not enthusiastically pursue
getting high on cocaine as often as possible as Barack Hussein Obama
has admitted in his book (paraphrase, synopsis), according to (mmm,
mmm, mmm (sonic emphasis)) Rush Hudson Limbaugh, (mmm mmm mmm (sonic
emphasis)).

j) Use of this disclaimer for either personal or professional use is
permitted with no restrictions. These restrictions or disclaimers do
not prohibit the author from pursuing or communicating in a truthful
manner, or guarantee that the audience will understand all things as
intended, and, or result in being called incoherent, or even a Chicken
Chaser!

On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:05:20 -0700 (PDT), Editor RadioTalkingPoints
wrote:

Setting up Rush Limbaugh?

Come back and talk to us about this after Rush goes to jail
for drug trafficing, and spens a few years behind bars.

Just like he said drug addicts should do.

After all we only expect him to live up to the words he insisted on
applying to drug addicts.